Since when does feminine=boobilicious? I mean goodness, someone states they want a little style and instantly that means we’re going to go full DD-cup furries? Calm yourselves please. Like I stated previously, I like the current armor we have, and I made very pretty/feminine (COME AT ME I SAID IT) charr with what I had to work with, and they’ll still kick your kitten if you mess with them. Is it so wrong I didn’t want to look like brutes? A little variety isn’t bad, I mean if you’re arguing that “It’s against the lore” I implore you to look at half the armor in the light category and tell me just how much goes with the lore. I see charr wearing a frilly flower dress (TA armor) in ALL the lore stories. (Sarcasm at it’s finest)
Leia Spiritrose and her warband partner Karra Bloodrose everybody. Showing the world you can be beautiful and classy all at the same time. (Oh and Karra’s loyal devourer Lillith, she’s beautiful too.)
They’ve given me such a hard time on the previous page and I wasn’t asking for much. However I think that’s why FenGuild said furrie community overall is frowned upon because one little idea such as feminine armor for female charr and asura is cataclysmic to their minds. I’m thinking patterns while they’re thinking sexual stuff which tells you where their minds are at. Then they use lore as the excuse..I mean what about the charrs living in the diverse city Lion’s Arch. Sooner or later they’ll follow the trend on who wears what, but its always an optional choice for them.
@ Frayta
I don’t think FenGuild was using the furrie term in a offensive way nor is it overall. He probably think it’s absurd on how people come with a reason why this cannot have that because it doesn’t fit their view. Then uses words as * our * or * we * as if they talking for the whole furrie community.
He isn’t a furrie, but if he was…. he’ll probably lose interest in it quick if he had to deal with this type of resistance on a small idea and then gets criticize about it.
You know it’s hard to tell on the internet when it comes to context- Its some something I have to say at times, not just toward him- but generally speaking- its a volatile word that shouldn’t be used unless it has to be- there are so many different opinions of what is furry, none of them are standard- Personally I follow the thinking that beast races come in 3 major classifications Were, Anthro, and furry- the last being mascot like, or pertaining to fur suit aesthetic.
As for just a generally tamer, softer armor for charr- I’m ok with that too, as long as it isn’t dimorphic like someone else suggested. Female charr don’t have breasts- so were sort of safe from ‘versioning’ But it is that lore that gives reason for female armor to hold little to no difference to the males. When I throw some pants on my charr- I expect pants, and skirt to skirt. Ironically this means the devs actually have less work when making armor for charr, because they don’t have to map out a female version.
It’s difficult to place the word feminine when it comes to armor, and general fashion. Let us say a man and woman are wearing the same clothes- the only defining difference then is how they choose to wear them-obviously anatomy has a lot of influence on this- but when we are on equal playing fields, its harder for us to say what still makes her version feminine, other then the fact she is female.
(edited by Frayta.4816)