And all who stood by and did nothing, who are they to criticize the sacrifices of others?
Our blood has bought their lives.
I might have misread but how exactly does this idea of a tournament eliminate RNG?
I mainly meant that as:
Players would probably be better than your normal pug. So you wouldn’t be having a brand new player in your group.
So you are basically saying that it depends on the individual skill level of the somewhat experienced dungeon runner? I still fail to comprehend how the skill level of 1/5th of the group matters that much. Lets say you have one experienced player able to solo the certain dungeon mixed with 4 others , wont the result of the run heavily depend on those 4 other people?
Those are pretty interesting Ideas Iris. I would prefer 1 fixed streamer because if everyone would have to be able to stream it might scare potential participants!
Oh, participants don’t have to stream. But, they are encouraged to volunteer for streaming. If you are a streamer, here are some benefits:
To Giannis, here is the flow of my thought:
(edited by Iris Ng.9845)
+1 for your thoughts mate!
I personally like the Idea of extra winners getting chosen by the audience.
Promoting the tourney might become a challenge, maybe start with a name for it ?
Dungeon Madness ? Not good at finding names ..
I have an idea of asking artists for giving out free commisions to our streamers. It requires someone with a good connection to approach the artists :p
Which “artists“ do you mean ?
This is a very nice idea, I would love to participate.
Like this: https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/community/fangen/Affordable-Art-1G-Sketches-and-More-FULL/first
Pretty nice. Even paid commisions with discount is nice, too.
That would be pretty awesome. I would not mind handing out a few gold for some cool artworks!
I love brainstorming. If RNG is a concerning factor, then how’s about going wild with RNG?
Let’s call it the “precursor tournament” and give the first place to the team who gets duks first?
I love brainstorming. If RNG is a concerning factor, then how’s about going wild with RNG?
Let’s call it the “precursor tournament” and give the first place to the team who gets dusk first?
Oh, you
Nat from [SC] would totally win this one, hands down. He pulled dozen of precursors from the forge by sheer will.
I pugged my way through fractal 40 and learned Arah the same way, so I know how it goes. PUG dungeon rules should be this; no communication except using the party chat, everyone must rep his/her bank guild to prevent guild chat, can only bring two classes and matched with random people. TS3 must be muted the whole time and players cannot use consumables such as potions/food.
PUGventure ftw
Iris’ idea is really solid. The advance by not losing archetype is a much stronger approach than a standard tournament bracket for this kind of thing, and the constant shuffling means that RNGing a really good team won’t smash everything. It does make streaming tougher, but if streamers gain some incentive and there are enough, then it could still work out.
The only thing you really have to be careful of is how long a tournament like this could take. Eliminating only 1 team at a time might be painfully slow, but this could be turned around if it were a single path as opposed to a BO3 like the team tournaments we’ve had thus far. I think doing a single path might make the chaos even more intense, and might make managing the tournament hell, but that could work.
Very cool ideas, though; I would definitely participate.
from someone who pugs 40 & 49/50 fractals most days:
love this idea, count me in, ill have to keep an eye on this thread, and i could maybe be talked into streaming
im rather partial to what iris has said too
although… i have dungeon master, 9 80’s, and knowledge of over 1/2 of the dungeon paths… but my hobby explorer is low (only recently did arah p4 and i fractal much more than dungeon) and my only fully geared toons are both engi. i hope i wouldnt get auto DQ’d, but if this happens in the mid term instead of the short term i could easily meet the quals. ill be a total baddie if im forced off my engi too lol.
from someone who pugs 40 & 49/50 fractals most days:
love this idea, count me in, ill have to keep an eye on this thread, and i could maybe be talked into streamingim rather partial to what iris has said too
although… i have dungeon master, 9 80’s, and knowledge of over 1/2 of the dungeon paths… but my hobby explorer is low (only recently did arah p4 and i fractal much more than dungeon) and my only fully geared toons are both engi. i hope i wouldnt get auto DQ’d, but if this happens in the mid term instead of the short term i could easily meet the quals. ill be a total baddie if im forced off my engi too lol.
For requirements in terms of DM and hobby, those were just thrown out there. People disagree on what sort of metric should be used, so that is still up for debate.
Just to clarify, I am thinking if I run this of trying to prepare it for mid to late december. If someone else takes the reigns which is possible that would be their call.
I’ve actually yet to do SE2, personally just not a big achievement hunter so never felt the need to get the title and never had a group interested in SE2 so just never did it. It was the same with Aetherpath until recently when some cool kids carried me through
I’ve actually yet to do SE2, personally just not a big achievement hunter so never felt the need to get the title and never had a group interested in SE2 so just never did it. It was the same with Aetherpath until recently when some cool kids carried me through
Contact Kevin. We [Club] could totally set that up with you for fun
I would suggest that a good way to “balance” the RNG of a pug tournament is have the teams rearrange each round.
Ill take the 30 participants mentioned earlier and work with that. Players 1,6,11,16,21,26 are all streamers.
Round 1: 1-5, vs 6-10, 11-15 vs 16-20 etc.
Round 2: 1,13,25,23,29 vs 2,6,12,18,24 (for arguments sake) etc.
Run maybe 3 or 4 rounds to get an even distribution, and apply points to players of the winning and losing team. 2 points for each win, 1 point for a draw (both bug out/wipe (if running no wipe rules which I kind of like for a pug tourny)) 0 for a loss.
After 4 rounds, top 20 players progress and get seeded.
1/20/5/16/12
2/19/6/15/11
3/18/7/14/10
4/17/8/13/9
With a semi final round, top 2 teams go to final round.
I would also suggest that for the “round robin” rounds it be a single dungeon run, not a best of 3 scenario.
Which “artists“ do you mean ?
Pr0n stars.
Anyone else thinks that the loosers will be those rng’ed out by getting worse team mates than the winners?
(edited by Miku Lawrence.6329)
Which “artists“ do you mean ?
Pr0n stars.
Anyone else thinks that the loosers will be those rng’ed out by getting worse team mates than the winners?
crowd favorite concept will help to mitigate that
Issue you might have is some people actualy know how to play meta but refuse to do so. What do you think will happen if you actualy get matched up with a axe ranger who despite knowing all to well the build has serious teamwork issue still wants to play it? Especialy if the so called axe ranger also know all to well how to play his class as well as all the mechanics involving meta the guy might just as well be using frost spirit but may not have other stuffs and or may not even run the meta weapon (small exemple).
I mean its casual guys. You have no idea what kind of mess you might get yourself into including staff guardian, hammer warriors, Phantasm mesmers, MM necros or it might even be Flamethrower enginer. The casual community isnt as caring for meta as is the premade team dungeon runners, the moment you go into casual territory you enter a totaly new world.
(yes im still haunting the forum and no i dont plan participating in this event)
Keep in mind the moment it becomes as organised as to use premade teams composition its prety much no longuer a pug but a premade. You no longuer running with random people at this point and the only factor is dungeon knowledge something that only one of the 5 player in the team need to possess.
(edited by kyubi.3620)
That’s why it’s based on an individual effort. Get stuck with some non metas, that’s part of the challenge!
I think that’s the beauty of Iris’s suggestion. If you see a staff guard and rage you’re not going to be helping anything. But, if you can still come through you’ll look awesome. If your whole group wipes and you pull through, you’ll surely be a candidate for a viewer choice.
I dont see what the “staff guardian” gets out of it if its only to make the “pro’s” of the group look good. Actually I can probably imagine twitch chat concerning any unconventional pugs that dont contribute to a win or cause a lose.
And what if one cant come through what would be the point other than frustration?
Viewers choice? seems like instead of one of the “pro” guilds winning it will be a member of one of the “pro” guilds winning.
Its one thing for a team to practice together and lose together and its another thing for 5 people to “practice” individually and lose together.
oh a requirement that should probably be considered. mainly for eu but can be a problem for NA.
Languages
(edited by DonQuack.9025)
I mean its casual guys. You have no idea what kind of mess you might get yourself into including staff guardian, hammer warriors, Phantasm mesmers, MM necros or it might even be Flamethrower enginer.
Wait wut
He probably meant shatter.
He didn’t. ;>
Phantasm mesmer is cancerous for speed run, guys * whistle *.
Back to the first Tournament held by DnT, No FGS was clearly the crowd’s favorite. I bet they are even more popular than [SC]. Are they from a ‘pro’ guild? Nope. But their effort are widely recognized.
Not affiliated with ArenaNet or NCSOFT. No support is provided.
All assets, page layout, visual style belong to ArenaNet and are used solely to replicate the original design and preserve the original look and feel.
Contact /u/e-scrape-artist on reddit if you encounter a bug.