Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Kal Spiro.9745

Kal Spiro.9745

Who is driving the Pact Tanks btw?

Charr drive. If you mean, what is powering them, that would be hamsters. They run very very fast because they’re afraid of the Charr behind them.

In the contest of this thread, no you can’t have a Tank as a mount.

Tarnished Coast Kal Spiro – Ranger (80), LB/S-D, Eagle/Wolf, Signet, M/S/WS #SABorRiot
|Daredevil|Ranger|Guardian|Scrapper|Necromancer|Berserker|Dragonhunter|Mesmer|Elementalist
|Deadeye|Warrior|Herald|Daredevil|Reaper|Spellbreaker

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Kal Spiro.9745

Kal Spiro.9745

Mounts should be added because they’re cool, not because they’re needed.

No, that is exactly the reason they should not be added. Things should not be added just so they exist. They should be added to fill a purpose. Even musical instruments fill a purpose, which is to annoy as many people around you as possible with you poorly played rendition of the GoT theme.

If it is not needed, then it absolutely should not be added.

Tarnished Coast Kal Spiro – Ranger (80), LB/S-D, Eagle/Wolf, Signet, M/S/WS #SABorRiot
|Daredevil|Ranger|Guardian|Scrapper|Necromancer|Berserker|Dragonhunter|Mesmer|Elementalist
|Deadeye|Warrior|Herald|Daredevil|Reaper|Spellbreaker

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Harper.4173

Harper.4173

I agree- there’s no need for mounts in GW2.

If here they fall they shall live on when ever you cry “For Ascalon!”

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Brother Grimm.5176

Brother Grimm.5176

Didn’t read but has anyone posted a dead mount begin beaten pic, yet?… ..I can go find one if needed.

Never mind…already taken care of….good show!

We go out in the world and take our chances
Fate is just the weight of circumstances
That’s the way that lady luck dances

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Rouven.7409

Rouven.7409

Who is driving the Pact Tanks btw?

Charr drive. If you mean, what is powering them, that would be hamsters. They run very very fast because they’re afraid of the Charr behind them.

In the contest of this thread, no you can’t have a Tank as a mount.

Dang. I thought for a second I won. But I know it’s unrealistic. Asura would never reach the gas pedal.

“Whose Kitten is this?” – “It’s a Charr baby.”
“Whose Charr is this?”- “Ted’s.”
“Who’s Ted?”- “Ted’s dead, baby. Ted’s dead.”

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: IrishPotato.6327

IrishPotato.6327

….No. Someone post that beating a dead horse pic this guy hasn’t seen it enough.

One “mount” coming up!

I love you

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Astral Projections.7320

Astral Projections.7320

But everyone already has a mount. Shanks Mare. Comes with each new character and has the profession specific speed boost.

Attachments:

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Im Mudbone.1437

Im Mudbone.1437

But everyone already has a mount. Shanks Mare. Comes with each new character and has the profession specific speed boost.

I saw it move, beat it again.

Blackgate Megaserver – [LaZy] Imperium of LaZy Nation
Mud Bone – Sylvari Ranger

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Zavve.8205

Zavve.8205

Waypoints>Mounts
/thread X7 (since i think knives should actually have been 6th)

Anyway, mounts are not something that have been present in the GW lore. To add them now would be… odd. It would add that ‘one more thing’ to the people already kittening that the writers are screwing up and/or ignoring the existing lore of the game.

Outside that, they would provide no useful functionality. With the current design of the game, mounts simply are not needed as a means of transportation. All classes have traits or skills that offer speed boosts, though not necessarily passively.

Cosmetically speaking, they’re simply going to be a pain. Oh, I know the broom and the drill are technically mounts, but they are also extremely simple. If mounts were implemented, they might start out simple, but eventually people are going to want that rainbow trail footprint pony or that sparkly golem or some fiery hellhound. Something with particle effects, something “legendary.” We can’t see through the particle effects we already have, let’s not add more… Not to mention the associated lag.

After that it escalates to “we want more functionality” “we want to battle” etc etc. We’ve already seen people calling for these types of things in other mount proposals. Speed boosts, flying, mounted combat, etc etc.

If they give an inch, players are going to demand a mile.

+1

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: xNICONx.5386

xNICONx.5386

I think mounts would be kind of cool because the games is an adventure. Its really good but mounts I think would make more sense in certain views, but in others mounts could make the game less adventuress but i think mounts would make it better

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Maliel.8362

Maliel.8362

Some professions, like the Mesmer and Guardian lack a passive movement speed skill. Not that I support of them having this but I do see a lot of complaints on this issue. In my opinion, if they ever do add mounts with movement speed they should keep it at 25% to be balanced with other professions that have a skill that grants passive movement speed.

You can always use Runes of Speed or Runes of the Traveler.

Mounts- Why or why not should they be added?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: pdavis.8031

pdavis.8031

“You know what the chain of command is?
It’s the chain I beat you with until you
recognize my command!”