[Suggestion] Mounts in GW2
I dont remember the name of the thread, there’s also a reddit link, apparently someone found some info on the expansion. One thing was a mastery trait line that allows you to mount raptors either solo or with friends. Make of that what you want.
One thing was a mastery trait line that allows you to mount raptors either solo or with friends. Make of that what you want.
Now I want a flock of pocket raptors harnessed to a chariot to pull me around Tyria. o.O
~EW
A pocket raptor strapped to the bottom of each boot, like a pair of skates….
And an asura on a string at the end of a stick to entice the raptors to run faster.
Mounts would just be the best
We can’t have mounts because people keep beating the horses to death.
I dont remember the name of the thread, there’s also a reddit link, apparently someone found some info on the expansion. One thing was a mastery trait line that allows you to mount raptors either solo or with friends. Make of that what you want.
That’s a rumor thread.
This is how rumors suddenly become fact.
Edit: I see the thread here is gone. If one is interested in the rumors, I would imagine the thread(s) are still up on Reddit.
(edited by Inculpatus cedo.9234)
I can post it, but before I do I want to check: would it be against forum conduct to do so? I don’t want to be infringed or anything like that for “spreading rumors.”
This again?
Ok. Summary:
1- Some people like mounts. Some people don’t. Arguments come and go always the same.
2- Mounts could be a great cosmetic addition to the gemstore, say someone. They will contibute to the visual clutter that already drowns the game, answer someone.
3- Mounts couldn’t have speed boosts because that would destroy the balance in the exploration part of the game, explains someone. People who plays only combat oriented despises this reasoning and use recursive arguments to say mounts with boost being non-combat only should be ok.
4-Mounts could look so cool, says one. They will stress up the servers, accuses another. Technical discussion about processing resources, graphic properties and toggles ensues. Not conclusive.
5- Someone mention cosmetic mounts already exist, in the form of travel toys like the flying carpet. Mount fans don’t like that solution and recognize they want speed boosts anyway.
6- People began to post lush examples from other games. WOW fans shine. WOW fans are encouraged to go back to play that.
7- Someone says Anet already said they never allow mounts. Someone says Anet never said that. No sources are given on any of these claims.
8- Back to 1 a few times.
9- Topic get merged with the big one.
10- Lots of dead horse beating gifs and images.
that it makes every other class in the game boring to play.”
Hawks
(edited by Ardid.7203)
This again?
Ok. Summary:
1- Some people like mounts. Some people don’t. Arguments come and go always the same.
2- Mounts could be a great cosmetic addition to the gemstore, say someone. They will contibute to the visual clutter that already drowns the game, answer someone.
3- Mounts couldn’t have speed boosts because that would destroy the balance in the exploration part of the game, explains someone. People who plays only combat oriented despises this reasoning and use recursive arguments to say mounts with boost being non-combat only should be ok.
4-Mounts could look so cool, says one. They will stress up the servers, accuses another. Technical discussion about processing resources, graphic properties and toggles ensues. Not conclusive.
5- Someone mention cosmetic mounts already exist, in the form of travel toys like the flying carpet. Mount fans don’t like that solution and recognize they want speed boosts anyway.
6- People began to post lush examples from other games. WOW fans shine. WOW fans are encouraged to go back to play that.
7- Someone says Anet already said they never allow mounts. Someone says Anet never said that. No sources are given on any of these claims.
8- Back to 1 a few times.
9- Topic get merged with the big one.
10- Lots of dead horse beating gifs and images.
This should be force-stickied to the first post of every future mount post from here on out.
This again?
Ok. Summary:
1- Some people like mounts. Some people don’t. Arguments come and go always the same.
2- Mounts could be a great cosmetic addition to the gemstore, say someone. They will contibute to the visual clutter that already drowns the game, answer someone.
3- Mounts couldn’t have speed boosts because that would destroy the balance in the exploration part of the game, explains someone. People who plays only combat oriented despises this reasoning and use recursive arguments to say mounts with boost being non-combat only should be ok.
4-Mounts could look so cool, says one. They will stress up the servers, accuses another. Technical discussion about processing resources, graphic properties and toggles ensues. Not conclusive.
5- Someone mention cosmetic mounts already exist, in the form of travel toys like the flying carpet. Mount fans don’t like that solution and recognize they want speed boosts anyway.
6- People began to post lush examples from other games. WOW fans shine. WOW fans are encouraged to go back to play that.
7- Someone says Anet already said they never allow mounts. Someone says Anet never said that. No sources are given on any of these claims.
8- Back to 1 a few times.
9- Topic get merged with the big one.
10- Lots of dead horse beating gifs and images.
this.
also, points to sig
- : Mounts, ViP-Player systems, HoT-like Xpacs
Have a nice day.
This again?
Ok. Summary:
1- Some people like mounts. Some people don’t. Arguments come and go always the same.
2- Mounts could be a great cosmetic addition to the gemstore, say someone. They will contibute to the visual clutter that already drowns the game, answer someone.
3- Mounts couldn’t have speed boosts because that would destroy the balance in the exploration part of the game, explains someone. People who plays only combat oriented despises this reasoning and use recursive arguments to say mounts with boost being non-combat only should be ok.
4-Mounts could look so cool, says one. They will stress up the servers, accuses another. Technical discussion about processing resources, graphic properties and toggles ensues. Not conclusive.
5- Someone mention cosmetic mounts already exist, in the form of travel toys like the flying carpet. Mount fans don’t like that solution and recognize they want speed boosts anyway.
6- People began to post lush examples from other games. WOW fans shine. WOW fans are encouraged to go back to play that.
7- Someone says Anet already said they never allow mounts. Someone says Anet never said that. No sources are given on any of these claims.
8- Back to 1 a few times.
9- Topic get merged with the big one.
10- Lots of dead horse beating gifs and images.
Rather complete summary, but it misses the “zomg mounted combat would be so cool” that eventually shows up.
“I’m finding companies should sell access to forums,
it seems many like them better than the games they comment on.” -Horrorscope.7632
This again?
Ok. Summary:
1- Some people like mounts. Some people don’t. Arguments come and go always the same.
2- Mounts could be a great cosmetic addition to the gemstore, say someone. They will contibute to the visual clutter that already drowns the game, answer someone.
3- Mounts couldn’t have speed boosts because that would destroy the balance in the exploration part of the game, explains someone. People who plays only combat oriented despises this reasoning and use recursive arguments to say mounts with boost being non-combat only should be ok.
4-Mounts could look so cool, says one. They will stress up the servers, accuses another. Technical discussion about processing resources, graphic properties and toggles ensues. Not conclusive.
5- Someone mention cosmetic mounts already exist, in the form of travel toys like the flying carpet. Mount fans don’t like that solution and recognize they want speed boosts anyway.
6- People began to post lush examples from other games. WOW fans shine. WOW fans are encouraged to go back to play that.
7- Someone says Anet already said they never allow mounts. Someone says Anet never said that. No sources are given on any of these claims.
8- Back to 1 a few times.
9- Topic get merged with the big one.
10- Lots of dead horse beating gifs and images.
Yep, sounds about right. Thanks!
| Claara
Your skin will wrinkle and your youth will fade, but your soul is endless.
They can’t keep minis active on the screen now. Mounts would only make this problem worse.
I can post it, but before I do I want to check: would it be against forum conduct to do so? I don’t want to be infringed or anything like that for “spreading rumors.”
It is against forum conduct and i includes discussing datamined content (something I’ve been caught out for forgetting myself).
If mounts are going to introduced , I want a Segway.
He-hey! it’s one of these threads again! long time no see
I really hope Anet doesn’t waste valuable development time making mounts.
Im pretty sure with ArenaNet theres only one thing that is important:
Nothing is off the table.
Ingame Name: Guardian Erik
I can post it, but before I do I want to check: would it be against forum conduct to do so? I don’t want to be infringed or anything like that for “spreading rumors.”
It is against forum conduct and i includes discussing datamined content (something I’ve been caught out for forgetting myself).
Dang…well, thanks for letting me know. I guess these silly gooses will just have to find it themselves.
Not sure what possible use anyone would get out of mounts when there are waypoints everywhere. Also mounted combat, while an awesome idea would never happen sadly
We can’t have mounts because people keep beating the horses to death.
We can upgrade to the Charr Car version.
Attachments:
Just add a toy mount (like we have already) no bonus speed no anything, just the toy. Personally I’d love some sort of skeletal steed for halloween.
Just add a toy mount (like we have already) no bonus speed no anything, just the toy. Personally I’d love some sort of skeletal steed for halloween.
https://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Necrid_Horseman or https://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Skeletal_Hound
Mounts are a wonderful idea! Forum Mods need to sticky this so Devs can see how much love we have for riding animals. Heck, I would love if we could mount other players. That way one player controls the direction, and the other player controls the combat.
As for the Devs never saying there would be no mounts, they actually did, before release.
http://guildwars2.cz/otazky-odpovedi-pro-guildwars2-cz/2/ (link from GW2 Wiki FAQ)
As far as I know, the Devs haven’t stated anything about reversing this stance.
As for the Devs never saying there would be no mounts, they actually did, before release.
http://guildwars2.cz/otazky-odpovedi-pro-guildwars2-cz/2/ (link from GW2 Wiki FAQ)
As far as I know, the Devs haven’t stated anything about reversing this stance.
That’s sad to hear.
Does riding other players still count as a “mount”? I really like the idea of teamwork fighting, with different players controlling different aspects of a fight. Plus you could add racial bonuses. Mounting a charr would give you a speed bonus, and mounting a norn’s shoulders would give you reach and power bonus. Something like that.
I think player-mounts highly unlikely. /smh
They can’t keep minis active on the screen now. Mounts would only make this problem worse.
That just got fixed.
Like I mentioned on other post among the subject. If functional mounts were to happen, they need to be Bugattis and Ferraris.
As for the Devs never saying there would be no mounts, they actually did, before release.
http://guildwars2.cz/otazky-odpovedi-pro-guildwars2-cz/2/ (link from GW2 Wiki FAQ)
As far as I know, the Devs haven’t stated anything about reversing this stance.
“there will be no other methods of long distance travel such as mounts, ships, etc in Guild Wars 2 upon initial release.”
By specifying, “upon initial release,” they have not established a stance for anything but how the game will launch and so have no stance to reverse regarding the possibility of adding mounts post launch.
if the supposedly leak is any true they are planning to have mounts in gw2 in the next expansion.
Black Gate
Ruthless Legend
Yes , i love mounts . Imagine if you could ride an elephant to the WvW battle . The enemy should respect you a bit . J/K
I think mounts is a good ideal , no speed increase , disappear when player attack mobs or someones ( WvW ) . I would pay 1000 gem for a Lion to ride it on the WvW battle field .
(edited by IcyTear.6378)
Then imagine the lag/fps drop when 2 whole zergs of mounted wvw’ers clash!!!
No thanks!!!
Then imagine the lag/fps drop when 2 whole zergs of mounted wvw’ers clash!!!
No thanks!!!
Lag/fps drop , that’s dev jobs , ask them ! For me i just want something new in this game . Beside , it’s good for Anet , they can sell more Gem .
Please no. It would break the game.
Gliders are fun enough.. This would be just ugh.
And yet, here we are, 4 years later….and no mounts.
Even if the rumors were/are true, it’s not the kind of mounts players usually think of, as far as I can tell. Something more like Junundu or Aspects.
(edited by Inculpatus cedo.9234)
And yet, here we are, 4 years later….and no mounts.
I would say: we have mounts in GW2, just that they are called glider and toy (Riding_Broom, Magic_Carpet, …) and not mount.
So to all that want a mount: Riding_Brooms are cheap in the TP currently, go on and get one.
(edited by Dayra.7405)
Please no. It would break the game.
Gliders are fun enough.. This would be just ugh.
It’s not enough , people alway want something new and a lot of people like mount and how can it break our game ? Does it increase base stat , movement speed or give you a buff ?
Seriously i thing mount is just like a ranger pet , a big minion , a special costume you buy in gem store , nothing more .
And yet, here we are, 4 years later….and no mounts.
I don’t see your point, we have mounts in GW2, just that they are called glider and toy (Riding_Broom, …) and not mount.
So if you want a mount: Riding_Broom are cheap in the TP currently, go on and get one.
I don’t think you will find, anywhere, any posts of mine in favor of mounts. (Easy enough to check my history.) Thus, I’m not sure what your point is.
Regardless, I’ve not heard Gliders referred to as mounts before, ever. Interesting take on it.
What’s a mount? Anything that changes your default walking animation, or not?
So sitting on a Riding_Broom or Magic_Carpet is mounting them.
Sometimes mounts extend your capapilities. A glider does excatly that, so mount your glider.
As I stated, interesting take on Gliders. Of course, one does not sit on a Glider; rather the Glider sits on us. Maybe we are the mounts! =P
Perhaps, then, you will convince all those asking for mounts that they already have what they asked for (as long as they have upgraded to HoT, of course).
there have been rumors about mounts in the new expantion..
So we might finally get some mounts, but they dont work like WoW mounts:
Here you go:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Guildwars2/comments/53d21c/what_might_come_in_expansion_2/
Allot of this stuff was true and is now in the game already.
Although all the “leaks&rumors” part on this thread IS new, I would like to add something more traditional to the discussion:
that it makes every other class in the game boring to play.”
Hawks
Mounts? YES. YES. and YES. We already have them in the form of a carpet and broom. Why not keep that functionality but add cool mounts!?!?!
It is literally the only thing I dislike about this game is the fact we don’t have mounts.
Mounts? YES. YES. and YES. We already have them in the form of a carpet and broom. Why not keep that functionality but add cool mounts!?!?!
It is literally the only thing I dislike about this game is the fact we don’t have mounts.
Come and play WvW, we mostly have some Golems for people that want cool mounts at spawn
And: I am against the abuse of animals as mounts.
Want speed? Swifty. Every profession has a 25% passive except guardian, who is easy to keep up perma swifty on.
Want to jump somewhere? Waypoints, or teleport to friend. Hell, you can even run through cities without touching a foe to get from one end of the world to the other.
Personally I’m over the mount suggestions. It’s been 4 years and we have the cosmetic mounts. If mounts as a “speedy” alternative were to be added, they would have been added a while back. Maybe in the next expac we’ll see some, who knows.
This topic has been done to death. Move on.
Well, this hasn’t been merged with the main mount thread, which they usually are and quite quickly when they appear. So I would hazard a guess that Anet is thinking about caving in and implementing mounts.
Well, this hasn’t been merged with the main mount thread, which they usually are and quite quickly when they appear. So I would hazard a guess that Anet is thinking about caving in and implementing mounts.
Or maybe the merged thread got too full. That horsebox must be so heavy with all the dead horses’ shoes in there!