You’ve been slashing and hacking your way through charr, mole-men, and aether-soldiers for the past week and now you’re having a moral dilemma about killing the chick that routinely drops orbital nukes on peaceful cities?
Yes. It’s my job to make sure she stops harming people. I leave judgement to those more qualified. Also, the issue isn’t defeating her in self defense…it’s about killing her when she’s pretty much helpless. I’m against the death penalty irl too.
I generally share that opinion to a point; orbital nuking a city is that point. Scarlet has also proven to me that she is never ‘helpless’. You have to respect her enough to know that, even as she’s kneeling in a pool of her own blood, she’s still a deadly opponent that can take your head off if your approach her carelessly. Given that she starts chucking grenades at you as soon as you get close to her I don’t think striking her down is any different than the hundreds of enemies you would have had to strike down to get to her in the first place.
She quite clearly wanted to go to jail as that was another step in her plan. You can tell it in the way she mocks you as she brings up what she assumes is the next course of action. Killing her was the only decent solution.
You know, she wasn’t actually THAT smart:
she kept hurling grenades at the mesmer who wasn’t even touching her while ignoring the guy coming to impale her.
Other than that, killing her is the really DUMB solution:
you have NO idea what she was doing and you probably won’t be able to understand what’s going on from her ship. You are just hoping that whatever she was doing by drilling in front of Lion’s Arch has been stopped soon enough will have no consequences whatsoever and that the whole process will stop with her demise.
This means counting on the fact her goal required time to be achieved, and she worked on it betting on the fact she could invade Lion’s Arch without anyone actually striking back until she was finished. Betting that no one would care about the destruction of the most important city in all of Tyria.
i.e.: Killing her means counting on the fact that the enemy who everyone recognizes as the highest mind of this time does something INCREDIBLY stupid.
Braham deserved MUCH MORE than a broken leg.
It’s not as though she attacked Lion’s Arch for giggles; the convergence of laylines was under the city (ironically, right around the central hub in GW1. Who would have thought that was there the whole time). She had to drill there if she wanted to accomplish whatever it was she was trying to accomplish.
She clearly planned on people caring or she would not nuked the city, coated it in miasma, and then placed nearly the entirety of her army throughout the place. The only part that is kind of dumb is that she kept sending her knights down to try to kill us while those were simultaneously the only way for us to reach her. I’ll chalk that one up to a gameplay mechanic, but honestly all she would have had to do is just… Stay up in her floating, impenetrable tower.
Also, she pretty much succeeded in her plans anyway; her timing was only slightly off. We literally arrived seconds too late.
I don’t think killing her was a dumb solution from the perspective of our characters at the time either; clearly whatever she was doing was bad, but given her history letting her live so that she might outsmart everyone again and continue killing everything in Tyria is also bad. I call killing her a ‘decent’ solution because it didn’t actually solve all our problems, it was just one of the better paths available to us at the moment. You don’t corner a tiger and then try to negotiate with it.