Twitch.tv/chaithh
New Twitter: @chaithhh
“engineer is balanced because two or more (coordinated) players can kill it when they team up against it by itself”
in what world
Most misleading fake quote of the year
ok then give me an argument that engie isn’t overpowered that doesn’t revolve almost entirely around engineer dying to two or more players at once (which is all you’ve done so far) or that condition necro counters engineers despite the fact that condition necro is then countered by multiple common meta builds.
you’d be the first engineer to actually manage it if you do
Okay, my face is starting to turn blue now, but it’s really simple, bud. It’s because the power level of Engineer, or ‘worth’ to a team as a balanced teamfight bruiser build, arguably it’s strongest role, is between the Ele and Warrior.
See: The EU usage of Engineers, compared to Thief/Mes synergy, double Eles and a 5th pick as a Warrior or Guardian.
Yes, I assume actual good players are behind the professions when their worth is evaluated. Yes, I acknowledge that Engineers start very strong when your enemies are not experienced. Yes, I acknowledge that Engineers have toxic mechanics like A.I, and regular burning application.
But overpowered relative to other professions? Firmly disagree.
How many people crying Engi OP here can post a screenshot of their “Champion Genius” title?
I have no idea when Engi became so op, but apparently something went horribly wrong and we are now gods. Nobody, not even Engineers, think IP nor any other trait like it is a good game mechanic. It’s just something we’ve been forced into taking, and would welcome a change (along with changes to other passive traits) with open arms. Hell, we would love for our other two elites to be viable so we aren’t forced into using Supply Crate all the time. Is supply Crate op, not in any way, but it’s all we’ve got.
Turret builds are a joke. I play turret Engi when I’m bored. It wrecks noobs. But soon as a player with any level of skill comes along I am in big trouble. Turret Engi is a hotjoin-level build that is played just for fun.
Outside of this, the real problem is certain runes/sigils/ammy’s ruining pvp. But this has literally nothing to do with the Engineer. This is a problem that exists across all professions.
TL:DR IP is not op but it is poor game mechanic along with many other passive traits in this game. If you are having issues with turret engi’s, that is a simple l2p issue, sorry. Sigils/Runes/Ammy’s are wrecking pvp balance, not the engineer’s fault.
IP is a strong trait, I’ll give you that. But I think it is compensated by the weakness of the pistol auto-attack, and that is the only weapon you can play in a condi build. You can still use EG, but it takes an utility slot, therefore many engineers don’t. The real strength of engineers in pvp, besides from turrets that are maybe too strong against low rank players, is their gameplay. Condi engis need to be close from their target, but not directly in melee. Therefore, they excel in running around on a node dropping bombs and/or grenades. They are not OP. Try playing one in WvW : skill is definitely needed.
Where in my original post did I call engineers OP? All I said was your class was a joke with multiple toxic mechanics, and the most ridiculous AI build ever made.
Then here comes the engineer brigade to complain how eles, warriors, necros are more OP.
This thread is not about who is is most OP. It’s about the kitten-poor mechanics that engineer revolves around.
Well sorry I misunderstood you. Ok then, we shall continue to play “our” poorly designed class (like most, engi is only one of the class I play), and enjoy it. Thank you for sharing your opinion. I have fun playing engineer, but if you do not like its mechanics, do not worry, there are 7 other professions you can play ! How great is that ?
Where in my original post did I call engineers OP? All I said was your class was a joke with multiple toxic mechanics, and the most ridiculous AI build ever made.
Then here comes the engineer brigade to complain how eles, warriors, necros are more OP.
This thread is not about who is is most OP. It’s about the kitten-poor mechanics that engineer revolves around.
Except that only certain Engi builds revolve around toxic mechanics, same with every other profession. And having played a turret Engi, I find them incredibly easy to beat since I know what I’m doing. Not to mention, once again, cheesy AI builds are not Engineer specific.
So this topic is just one huge attack about how much you hate being pwned by Engineers because you don’t feel they deserve to be able to pwn you.
These mechanics you complain of are in no way Engi specific, which is what everyone is trying to point out. However, your rage against the Engineer as a profession has you turning a deaf ear to anyone who doesn’t sympathize with you.
But I get it, you feel the need to rage, so rage. But do so in knowing that your rants are so ridiculous that it has literally zero impact towards the balance of the game and will eventually be buried and filed away among the many other pointless qq threads, completely disregarded and never to be read again.
Thief spotted
Yep, it sucks for you that those things counter you hard when you 1v1 an Engineer who’s in a defensive position.
Engineer is a great profession, but it dies in about ~5 seconds to a Thief/Necro, Mesmer/Thief, or Necro/Engi coordinated burst.
Oh yeah, because mesmer thief and thief necro takes AGES to kill other professions.
Engineer spotted defending his broken class.
Also, do I read “broken class” here ? Did you change your mind ?
Where in my original post did I call engineers OP? All I said was your class was a joke with multiple toxic mechanics, and the most ridiculous AI build ever made.
Then here comes the engineer brigade to complain how eles, warriors, necros are more OP.
This thread is not about who is is most OP. It’s about the kitten-poor mechanics that engineer revolves around.
Except that only certain Engi builds revolve around toxic mechanics, same with every other profession. And having played a turret Engi, I find them incredibly easy to beat since I know what I’m doing. Not to mention, once again, cheesy AI builds are not Engineer specific.
So this topic is just one huge attack about how much you hate being pwned by Engineers because you don’t feel they deserve to be able to pwn you.
These mechanics you complain of are in no way Engi specific, which is what everyone is trying to point out. However, your rage against the Engineer as a profession has you turning a deaf ear to anyone who doesn’t sympathize with you.
But I get it, you feel the need to rage, so rage. But do so in knowing that your rants are so ridiculous that it has literally zero impact towards the balance of the game and will eventually be buried and filed away among the many other pointless qq threads, completely disregarded and never to be read again.
Every thing I listed in my original post is 100% specific to Engineer. This is not a rage thread. Its funny that I’m make a logical argument against the majority of a profession’s 1v1 pressure coming from passive unavoidable procs and AI and people are complaining about me raging.
Turret builds: stack boons and kill your opponents for you? The ultimate passive AI experience
Incendiary powder: So much counter play to the undodgeable 7 second burn from Balth engineers
Crate: The “I win” button
Elixir gun: Permanent weakness on autoattack??? wtf?
Over 1k healing per second… ok
The only thing specific to Engineers in this post is the actual skills themselves. The problems behind the skills however are in no way Engi specific. Mechanics such as these exist across all professions, you have simply decided to attack Engineers.
So no, your topic is not specific to Engineers no matter how much you want it to be, your argument is flawed and illogical as pointed out many times over, and yes you are raging as evident by your strong desire to single out the Engineer and not the mechanics.
None of this matters though, since everything I previously stated is true and will eventually come to pass. You may continue enjoying your rant though.
How many people crying Engi OP here can post a screenshot of their “Champion Genius” title?
I have no idea when Engi became so op, but apparently something went horribly wrong and we are now gods. Nobody, not even Engineers, think IP nor any other trait like it is a good game mechanic. It’s just something we’ve been forced into taking, and would welcome a change (along with changes to other passive traits) with open arms. Hell, we would love for our other two elites to be viable so we aren’t forced into using Supply Crate all the time. Is supply Crate op, not in any way, but it’s all we’ve got.
Turret builds are a joke. I play turret Engi when I’m bored. It wrecks noobs. But soon as a player with any level of skill comes along I am in big trouble. Turret Engi is a hotjoin-level build that is played just for fun.
Outside of this, the real problem is certain runes/sigils/ammy’s ruining pvp. But this has literally nothing to do with the Engineer. This is a problem that exists across all professions.
TL:DR IP is not op but it is poor game mechanic along with many other passive traits in this game. If you are having issues with turret engi’s, that is a simple l2p issue, sorry. Sigils/Runes/Ammy’s are wrecking pvp balance, not the engineer’s fault.
Engi is fine. Celestial amulet could be toned down a bit, but the class does what it needs to.
Hell, we would love for our other two elites to be viable so we aren’t forced into using Supply Crate all the time.
Elixir X is the new meta but nobody knows yet.
turret engi is ruinining solo Q
To say that Engineers need a nerf is a galactic understatement!
Haven’t posted in a long time but I do believe Engineers bring a bit too much to the table, let me explain.
IP: I think everyone here can agree this needs to be changed. It is literally the mainstay to every Engineer build. You could avoid every single one of the engineer’s abilities that apply pressure and still potentially lose the fight due to the burning application.
Defensive Passive Procs; The whole point of CC is to setup burst, right? Now if I successfully cc/crit someone and they’re rewarded with a defensive boon, there’s an issue. You should not be rewarded for such passive play.
Multiple Kits: This has been a long-standing argument that needs to be brought up. Just because you have access to more skills, doesn’t mean your profession is more SKILLFUL. In fact, to the contrary, you have more buttons to apply both defensive/offensive pressure.
Uninterruptible healing skill: I have NEVER been able to successfully interrupt Healing Turret. We don’t even have to talk about the fact that it’s one of the most effective healing skills in the game.
To finish off i’m not saying there aren’t problems elsewhere because there certainly are(terrormancer, warriors still, cele’s to name a few). I’m just voicing my opinions on simple facts about this profession. Just to reiterate, anyone will drop when you have 2 or more on them bursting, this isn’t Engineer exclusive. One last thing, this post is meant to be constructive, if anyone can provide information to keep this calm discussion going, please do so.
Haven’t posted in a long time but I do believe Engineers bring a bit too much to the table, let me explain.
IP: I think everyone here can agree this needs to be changed. It is literally the mainstay to every Engineer build. You could avoid every single one of the engineer’s abilities that apply pressure and still potentially lose the fight due to the burning application.
Defensive Passive Procs; The whole point of CC is to setup burst, right? Now if I successfully cc/crit someone and they’re rewarded with a defensive boon, there’s an issue. You should not be rewarded for such passive play.
Multiple Kits: This has been a long-standing argument that needs to be brought up. Just because you have access to more skills, doesn’t mean your profession is more SKILLFUL. In fact, to the contrary, you have more buttons to apply both defensive/offensive pressure.
Uninterruptible healing skill: I have NEVER been able to successfully interrupt Healing Turret. We don’t even have to talk about the fact that it’s one of the most effective healing skills in the game.
To finish off i’m not saying there aren’t problems elsewhere because there certainly are(terrormancer, warriors still, cele’s to name a few). I’m just voicing my opinions on simple facts about this profession. Just to reiterate, anyone will drop when you have 2 or more on them bursting, this isn’t Engineer exclusive. One last thing, this post is meant to be constructive, if anyone can provide information to keep this calm discussion going, please do so.
I just wanted to say that I think that good points have been made here. +1’d.
Having read through the thread there is a lot of hyperbole and unconstructive hostility that really doesn’t make the discussion any better. I might just make a new thread at this point; but here’s my 2 cents.
For those that will TL;DR: yes, engi has toxic mechanics, but it is not alone. Specific toxic mechanics need to go; but if Engi was middle-tier before the rune and sigil changes; is it Engi that is OP? Or the April Sigil/Rune changes?
It’s a travesty if the thread needs to take 3 pages before even a single build is posted. Below are the current “meta” builds for Engineer (disclaimer: some variations may exist between NA and EU; and there’s more than 1 good choice for certain traits/sigils/runes in certain slots)
NA Cele Engi: http://gw2skills.net/editor/?fdAQFAUlUUpErlcx+KseNCbBNqxI6N2xq85IEgkC-TJxHwADeAAa2fAwFAoYZAA
EU Cele Engi: http://gw2skills.net/editor/?fdAQFAUlUUpErlcxdLseNCbBNyx0GRuxq85IEgkC-TJxHwADeAAa2fAwFAoYZAA
NA Rabid Engi: http://gw2skills.net/editor/?fdAQJAqalUUpErlcx+KseNCbBNyx0GRuxq85DEgkC-TJhHwAU2fAwJAAZZgAPAAA
EU Rabid Engi: http://gw2skills.net/editor/?fdAQJAqelUUpEr9ZxdLseRCbBNuxAGR2xq85GEgkC-TJhHwAU2fAwJAAZZgAPAAA
Obviously variations exist but these are some of the builds I’ve observed being played.
Keystone utilities of note:
Traits of note:
Keystone Runes of note:
Keystone Sigils of note:
I think it’s important to note several things that people need to acknowledge before decrying Engineer as a zero-skill class:
I’m playing a condition necro, a single flame turret on point kept me from taking the point because I couldn’t damage it.
Thanks Izzy.
Specific changes to toxic mechanics
I think at this point it should be acknowledged that Engineer as a whole is carried by and by extension tarnished by Incendiary Powder. It’s also not a new thing like IP was somehow a new trait or a new mechanic.
It’s been debated since late 2012, in fact . The conclusion of that was that nerfing IP would also require extensive rejiggering (yes this is a word) of Engineer autoattacks; specifically Pistol 1, Rifle 1 and FT1.
I would also say that prior to the April Sigil/Rune patch, IP was “balanced” – if you could call undodgeable, unblockable crit procs “balanced”. There were no ridiculous Might stacks to push burning up to ~700 DPS; nor was there Balthazar runes to push Burning to 7 seconds; nor indeed, could Engineer run double swap sigils (instead Engi ran the much more balanced Corruption sigil or forewent Energy for damage over survivability). Now the opportunity cost for Engineer builds has decreased – more evade frames, more damage; less bad matchups – so I ask again, is Engi OP? Or Runes and Sigils?
The easiest nerf to Engi would be a nerf to Strength, Hoelbrak, Balthazar runes, and Battle, Energy, Geomancy Sigils. In this climate of double swap sigils, the power level has gone up, but the traits and skills themselves are not in anyway diminished. So it would be easier to nerf the outliers than change the trait.
However! This does not mean that IP is not terrible design. In fact it’s horrible, lazy, despicable design that carries Engineers harder than individual skills, but Engineers run it because without IP Engineers have no pressure. As I mentioned before, even eating an entire GK spell reel – all grenades to the face – in a condi build – is ~ 500 condition based DPS. Only when you add IP to the mix does Engi become scary. (1100-1200 condition based DPS; the variability being Sharpshooter/Shrapnel procs or Pistol1 or EG1)
A nerf to crit procs like IP – and this is a design template that could be applied to all crit-procs could be like this:
A charge mechanic also decouples IP from being strongly influenced by +Condition duration mechanics. This is an extremely important “future-proofing” of the trait against further, future power creep.
More changes – if required
Honestly IP is the only thing that’s making Engineer silly right now. However, the OP did outline wanting to eliminate all of Engi’s toxic mechanics, so here’s more. It must be said, however, that these nerfs should apply to all classes. The power level in this game has never been higher; and the skill floor of this game has never been lower; yet build diversity for many professions have not diverged in any significant way since 2013. When Allie Murdock promised to shake up the meta in 2014 post December Patch; what she really meant was that people would use new sigils and runes instead; and some old builds like D/D ele or LB ranger would re-appear.
So! On to “difficult to counter” mechanics of the Engineer. Not necessarily toxic, but difficult to counterplay.
In short, Healing Turret could be nerfed, but I don’t think it’s that problematic right now. Half-casts in this game are generally overpowered. Expect Signet Condi ele to become the new “impossible to counterplay their cast times” with the buff. Half cast zero travel time Pin Down on Earth Signet? Sign me up.
Arken’s points about multiple kits
I think it’s interesting that the multiple kits argument gets brought up a lot; especially by people that have little exposure to Engineer. This is not to say that 1 second kit swaps aren’t strong – on the contrary – kit swaps allow Engineer an unprecedented number of animation cancels and allow Engi to proc on-swap Sigils with zero opportunity cost. But I do think that the argument is made in a vacuum without considering the broader ramifications of Engineer balance:
It’s also important to note that Grenade Kit stands on its own as one of the last, unnerfed kits the Engineer has. How’s that for build diversity? Let us count the reasons:
So the point that “all engineers do is spam Grenades” is well made but! It also is disingenuous because it ignores Engineer’s patch history. Engineers spam because their kits have been successively nerfed in many cases.
In fact the only trait that encouraged intelligent swapping – Kit Refinement – was Smiter’s Booned. At least with on swap you didn’t want to swap to a kit to proc a needless KR spell. Now? Swap all day for fun and games.
If anything Grenade Kit should be nerfed in this way, with the other Kits brought up forthwith:
This ends the Grenade Kit specific changes.
Other changes to Kit Engineer:
In general:
Bomb Kit
Elixir Gun
Flamethrower
Tool Kit
Med Kit
I think it’s important to note several things that people need to acknowledge before decrying Engineer as a zero-skill class:
- Spamming Grenades on point is definitely the most toxic mechanic of Engineers. But is this a problem of Grenades; or a problem of conquest, where most AOE skills eclipse the tiny size of points?
There’s a lot of builds that can do this too though. Mesmer off point pressure is arguably just as strong. Same with thief shortbow and a warrior dumping burning on an entire team. Because AI builds in the game are so silly strong and common, this needs to exist as a viable counter to those kinds of things.
- Incendiary Powder is one of the strongest crit-procs in the game. It’s been nerfed 3 times: from 33% for 2 sec every 3 seconds, to 2 seconds every 5 seconds, to 4 seconds every 10 seconds and moving Napalm Specialist to Grandmaster. And yet without it, Engineer doesn’t have the pressure from the bleed stacking capability of Necro (since Pistol 1 nerf of PBE) nor the “burst” condition application of Condi Warrior or Condi Ranger with sharpening stone.
- GK Spam has ludicrous condition diversity. Bleed, Poison, Blind, Chill. IP adds Burning, SPP adds Vulnerability. But consider the actual damage of GK’s condis without those traits: 3 stacks of Bleed (~300 DPS), Blind (no damage), Chill (no damage, but is a powerful snare), Poison (~140-200 DPS).
- In no way is eating an entire Grenade Kit’s spell reel going to be dangerous. Except! if you then get an IP proc (~600-650 DPS). So is this a GK problem, or an IP problem?
Amen. I think a lot more of the actual condition damage needs to be sunk into the skills by default instead of traited for so they can be applied by an auto attack.
That’s the thing about a lot of builds in this game. It’s not the skills themselves. Engis who are making huge mistakes are able to win fights simply because their “big cool down” is easy to land. It requires little skill on the part of the enemy and high skill on the part of the defender. IP can proc off of pistol auto attacks, which are incredibly easy to land, and sometimes, are required to soak up simply because there’s more dangerous stuff coming in such as a magnet pull or nades.
If this game didn’t have most of the sigils that exist right now, I think we’d have a MUCH easier time balancing everything out. Imagine all the builds you think are OP without these sigils in it:
If anything, I think these 7 deadly sigils should be looked at first rather than the builds themselves because these are really what create insane builds that are easy to play. I’d love to test every build in the game with this:
Just to see if it makes them more managable. Of course there would be some builds that are super strong (for example warriors since there would be less doom sigil going around). That said, I think the majority of builds would become a lot easier to balance and the true outliers would become more apparent.
Sigils right now seem to be so crazily build defining and to me, that should be just a minor boost.
make grenades have a "danger close" zone where if thrown too closely to the engineer they self-inflict conditions or damage to both the engineer and their turrets. or just make it so they can’t throw nades within their immediate area and then make nades travel 33% faster. otherwise, nades get to act as both nades and bombs while being even better at doing what bombkit is supposed to do thanks to their instant fuse at short range and they give 3 chances at minimum to proc IP
make grenades have a “danger close” zone where if thrown too closely to the engineer they self-inflict conditions or damage to both the engineer and their turrets. or just make it so they can’t throw nades within their immediate area and then make nades travel 33% faster. otherwise, nades get to act as both nades and bombs while being even better at doing what bombkit is supposed to do thanks to their instant fuse at short range and they give 3 chances at minimum to proc IP
Hahaha. Simply put, friendly fire is just a path that leads nowhere positive for the game.
Also, instant fuse at short range for bombs? Bombs are ridiculously slow and avoidable – I’d go so far as to say they’re only usable on immobilized, point-committed, and downed bodies. Counter-pressuring a mobile Thief or Mesmer, for example, with bombs, I would go so far as to say that this is extremely rare. Unless they deem it ‘worth’ and eat some ticks of a fire bomb for a good reason, of course.
Yes, grenades are too good, compared to bombs. It has that snap 1v1 counter-pressure, where the Engineer really has little access to that, otherwise. Thats why in PvP, Grenade-less builds don’t really happen.
I’d love to use Bombs instead of Grenades, for a change. Maybe change Autodefense Bomb Dispenser trait to remove the fuse time of bombs (not the casting time, and not Big Ol’ Bomb). That would mean it would be unable to be used with grenades in the same build.
I’d totally run this build, then!
http://gw2skills.net/editor/?fdAQFAUlUUpPrtbxkLseNCbBNyx8GRuxq85GEglC-TJRHwAFeAAAuAAk2f4YZAA
Well, they could be troublesome when everything is set up.
As I main thief, I make sure that I’m the one who strike first, and I strike safely, I don’t let my enemies get ready, I strike from nowhere.
If things were set up, then that’s a trap you shouldn’t walk into.
Monmalthias brings up some really good points, a lot of these changes would most certainly make the engineer rely more on the actual skills their using instead of the traits doing the work for them.
I still want to bring up the topic of defensive traits. Protective shield/Injection are also poorly designed traits. The whole purpose of CCing someone is to setup burst, why reward someone who was unable to avoid it with damage reduction? Maybe attaching some of these to skills or maybe gain protection when successfully stun-breaking out of a skill?
Edit: Once again, i’m sure quite a few professions have access to some of these but the discussion here are Engineer’s.
Monmalthias brings up some really good points, a lot of these changes would most certainly make the engineer rely more on the actual skills their using instead of the traits doing the work for them.
I still want to bring up the topic of defensive traits. Protective shield/Injection are also poorly designed traits. The whole purpose of CCing someone is to setup burst, why reward someone who was unable to avoid it with damage reduction? Maybe attaching some of these to skills or maybe gain protection when successfully stun-breaking out of a skill?
Edit: Once again, i’m sure quite a few professions have access to some of these but the discussion here are Engineer’s.
Engineer is the best against CC in a 5v5 environment ^^ so good my only stun break is with Elixir Gun love the CD.
There needs to be some degree of “passive trait” since the options are limited,could fix the options but I am low on expectations.
(edited by Sagat.3285)
Except that degree of passiveness is toxic for the game. Maybe add more stun-breakers to the Engineer’s kitten nal?
Except that degree of passiveness is toxic for the game. Maybe add more stun-breakers to the Engineer’s kitten nal?
I said could fix option but….
-Are they toxic in team environment or the forbidden 1v1?
-Do we trust balance or have personal opinions?
It’s interesting talking balance in pvp when conquest is the main mode and courtyard a let down.
Not so much of a forbidden thing in 1v1 as it’s a crutch to the player who got hit with cc. You’re essentially being rewarded by getting hit, contrary to the games design.
I meant that the 1v1 argument is poor and personal but that is their way of helping engi with CC weakness. There is a lot that should change about the game but I lack the trust,patience and bravery to use my time to do much about it.
(edited by Sagat.3285)
I can see ip being changed for more counterplay just don’t forget to buff pistol aa. But some of you guys are hilarious trying to get every trait and kit changed to something that your class can roll over through. Don’t like protection injection? Sorry but its our protection against cheese. Stop spamming knockdowns and you will find it easier to deal with the engineer.
I still want to bring up the topic of defensive traits. Protective shield/Injection are also poorly designed traits. The whole purpose of CCing someone is to setup burst, why reward someone who was unable to avoid it with damage reduction? Maybe attaching some of these to skills or maybe gain protection when successfully stun-breaking out of a skill?
These traits are fine. They lessen incoming damage, but don’t completely negate it and are mostly predictable. Your burst wasn’t completely negated – most of it got through. You just can’t rely on one CC and burst to explode an engi.
In comparison, abilities which comletely negate the CC are problematic. Compare Protection Injection to necromancer’s Reaper’s Protection (chance to fear when hit) and you’ll see that the engi version is decently balanced.
Having professions that aren’t as susceptible to burst damage adds variety to the game. You have elementalists which are good against sustain but weak to burst. What’s wrong with something that’s weak to CC and sustain, but not as weak against burst?
Not so much of a forbidden thing in 1v1 as it’s a crutch to the player who got hit with cc. You’re essentially being rewarded by getting hit, contrary to the games design.
No engineer meta builds are using prot injection anymore. Or protective shield. They’re only worth it vs. Mace or hammer warriors, really, which aren’t hugely concerning. Vigor is decidedly universally better.
runes and sigils + cele ammy are major offenders. Tbh cele wouldn’t be so strong if certain skills weren’t so strong with limited stat investment.
I’ve hit 6k pry bars on cele. That shouldn’t happen.
I’ve hit 4k auto attacks on mace warrior with cele. That shouldn’t happen.
6k fire grabs, (my cele staff ele could proc 2k with ice bow per hit. Thats just dumb)
Cele ranger doesn’t seem to have much power damage but.. the passive traits are lol.
Several Rune sets are still un-avoidable/dodgable/blockable/blindable they only bothered to fix balth.
Air, Fire, Battle, Geomancy (would be nearly worthless if it wasn’t for conquest fight on point style game), condi xfer sigil (rng can be fight decider), Hoelbrak, Strength, Doom (giving poison access to eles, warriors makes them decent condition builds. remove doom and ele will never kill anything not glass 1v1)
They buffed amulet critical damage AND gave us cele same time. Add in the runes + sigil changes and you have OP across the board.
Fix the bugs. Nerfs some runes/sigils. Change the stupid passive mechanics ( ALL PROFESSIONS) then balance.
lol.
Not so much of a forbidden thing in 1v1 as it’s a crutch to the player who got hit with cc. You’re essentially being rewarded by getting hit, contrary to the games design.
No engineer meta builds are using prot injection anymore. Or protective shield. They’re only worth it vs. Mace or hammer warriors, really, which aren’t hugely concerning. Vigor is decidedly universally better.
Right; with the recent dearth of warriors, the value of Protection Injection becomes decidedly less. That being said, it’s a good tossup between Invigorating Speed and Protection Injection. I would say the only “less flexible” pick in this case would be Backpack Regenerator in Master tier.
Again as I mentioned previously there’s more than 1 viable pick in the current meta builds running 4-6 Alchemy. They’re all good in the context of different team comps you’re facing.
With specific reference to Protection Injection as a passive CC mitigation tool, Engineer is not alone in this respect . Every class can slot traits that can mitigate CC in one way or another; although some traits are definitely better than others.
PI is strong because it offers a low cooldown passive for incomplete mitigation. The counter-CC traits of other classes – especially those that “reflect” incoming CC with CC of their own, have long cooldowns of 40-60 seconds. See: Mirror of Anguish and Reaper’s Protection . Incomplete but strong mitigators, such as Stealth, Shadowsteps, Shocking Aura all have intermediate cooldowns. Engineer’s PI and Warrior’s Last Stand definitely stand tall as one of the strongest counter-CC traits. In terms of absolute uptime, PI is perhaps the highest and for the least opportunity cost (Adept; where most others are Master+ Tier).
Given these things it’s easy to see why Engineers would choose to forsake stunbreaks entirely and rely on PI (Teldo 2012-2013) or instead rely on evade frames – Battle/Energy and/or Invigorating Speed. Vee Wee favours Adventurer Runes. Some Power builds favour Adrenal Implant. But PI is a good perennial pick precisely because it allows Engineer to focus on its best sources of damage mitigation; which is CC output, Block frames and Vigour uptime.
This begs the question then of whether PI is too much. After all it’s the highest uptime, lowest cooldown CC mitigation but again, it’s partial. Prot does nothing against Condi Necro or Condi Engi; nor Shatter Mesmer that will rip the Prot; nor Cele Ele/Warrior that has Burning through Prot. There are so many bad matchups in the meta right now that straight up ignore the presence of PI that like Chaith said, Engis (in NA) are now favouring more evade frames and sustain (BP Regen).
As for my opinion; I would much, much rather that PI be deleted and the following occur:
Barring that, PI should be reworked to grant Aegis upon using a Toolbelt skill with 30 seconds ICD; that resets when the Engineer is controlled. In this way, Engineer can stop the CC pain train by blocking the next incoming attack; but only as long as Toolbelt cooldowns remain. Or just keep it simple and make it grant Aegis on being Controlled for 4 seconds every 10 seconds; so multi-hit skills can get through.
So Chaith, I assume you saw TOG yesterday. Still feel like engi is balanced?
Trick question, we already know the answer.
Engineer is probably the best class atm.
Some of the skills are totally out of balance, though that does not necessarily make them gamebreakingly OP.
The fact that Poison Grenade can stack like 20s AoE poison is ridiculous.
And yes. Im aware that I should not stand in the circles, but that can be a little difficult in a 1v1 situation, where I dont want him to decap. The radius is also pretty solid since there are 3 fields.
Another thing is the health of turrets. I really only noticed this today where I specifically went for his Thumper Turret that was left behind. I simply could not kill it, not in time at least.
A turret should IMO be fairly easy to kill. This requires the engi to actually think about his turret placement, while nerfing that spec all the same.
Because let’s be honest there is a paradox here.
Logically ALL specs should be equally viable, but some builds are simply toxic for the game, which is for instance an AI build like Turret-Engineer. Having such specs in the meta is not good for the game, and then I don’t give a crap about equality rights.
They lower the skill-floor so much, that everyone can go into the game and be instantly beneficial for their team. That is not healthy for a competitive gamemode, and whether you want it or not, sPvP is and was designed to be.
Oh. And I forgot to mention Incendiary Powder. Why is that still in the game?
Since it’s a TRAIT it should as maximum grant 3s of burning including the available condi duration in sPvP, as long as its cooldown remain 10s.
(edited by KrisHQ.4719)
Anybody who doesn’t think Incendiary Powder is not over-budget for a master trait is just delusional.
However, you’re welcome to continue embarrassing yourself with arguments to the contrary.
Eventually Anet will realize the obvious…it just takes them awhile…see eles 1 year ago and warriors for the past year.
Incoming responses:
Steb we all know you cant beat a single engi stop the hate man.
Did you see how many eles were in the tournament? In EU rangers were more popular than engis lol.
Speshal you cannot compare traits between classes or what level they are on. For example I could argue my grandmaster trait in a horrid line for 50 percent vigor while warriors can get that passive on a signet or how rangers get 25 percent for 1 trait point lol.
Kris dont harp on engis for turrets. Arenanet made them immune to condis, crits, NOT us. Dont blame engis we dont want turrets viable/in existence either. (not for pvp atleast)
Monmath – Thats an interesting idea except 1 major flaw. If we are cc’d we CANNOT use tool-belts unless they are instant/ stun break. Which defeats your entire idea’s purpose lol. Tbh PI is better balanced than most other professions cc mechanics as RNG ( or guessing) decides when the cooldown is up. There isn’t a way to accurately guess when the cd is gone where PI is always up unless it just proc’d.
Kris- I can argue SO MANY other professions having high duration conditions in aoe fields. Hell some Aoe fields are un-avoidable in conquest fighting. Poison grenades are not the issue with nades… the long distance high damage aoe is.
the more you guys argue that engi is the issue the more I LOL. This GAME has ALOT of broken mechanics/stupid things. Engis are by far not the only culprit.
You want these things changed? Then mention all the professions who abuse them.
Or I’ll just start threads assaulting your classes and their dumb mechanics.
Cough.
Thief – stealth and its limited counter play. (tele-ports are un-riveled too)
Ranger – just if not more passive than engi.
Warrior- So many immunities/passive built in with biggest aoe field possible. Highest hp + toughness + condi removal in game (only eles beat warrior condi removal)
Elementalist – highest condi removal + basically took guardians role but 100 percent passive.
Take out celestial amulet for now. That seems to be the main culprit unless you want to re-make a huge percentage of gw2 skills/traits/mechanics.
Thief spotted
Yep, it sucks for you that those things counter you hard when you 1v1 an Engineer who’s in a defensive position.
Engineer is a great profession, but it dies in about ~5 seconds to a Thief/Necro, Mesmer/Thief, or Necro/Engi coordinated burst.
I don’t get how you think “Just DT it” is a reasonable remedy for “Engie is broken 1v1”. Mind explaining?
Because IMO an engie being able to completely decap a point passively by dropping turrets on it and letting them autotarget any nearby enemies isnt very balanced.
(edited by Azure The Heartless.3261)
What would amuse me no end is if Anet changed the Supply Crate elite skill and leaned it towards the actual “player” to micro manage each and every one of those little turrets that they just love to use.
It would increase the learning curve of an engineer by a country mile and in all honesty and it would give players who use the engineer much more recognition rather then “one button does it all” lazy automatons.
^Dreams are strong on this one.
Just re posting what I had in another thread that got closed. Simple fix for now: Remove Celestial amulet and Might runes. Introduce them later when they’ve been extensively tested. Also, remove Settlers while you’re at it.
Edit: Also, this might sting a bit but I believe Rabid needs to be looked at. A lot of these amulets are really profession specific. You’ll never see a Guardian/Thief/Elementalist run it because of the low-tier health. By having medium-high tier health, the other professions can run it while maintaining their sustain through physical mitigation from said amulet.
(edited by Arken.3725)
Just re posting what I had in another thread that got closed. Simple fix for now: Remove Celestial amulet and Might runes. Introduce them later when they’ve been extensively tested. Also, remove Settlers while you’re at it.
Edit: Also, this might sting a bit but I believe Rabid needs to be looked at. A lot of these amulets are really profession specific. You’ll never see a Guardian/Thief/Elementalist run it because of the low-tier health. By having medium-high tier health, the other professions can run it while maintaining their sustain through physical mitigation from said amulet.
Removal doesn’t happen..oh wait war rifle bleed…you forgot how it affect other spec and classes,conquest favors long fights,combo field usage,bunker need more modes so the meta is variant.
I’m assuming all the pro on nerfing those spec are glassies with no counter against them #zerkerpvpers
Too bad zerk damage is weaker in pvp and jewels are no more.
(edited by Sagat.3285)
It might not happen but it should be considered. Passive stats carrying you is not what this game is about. Risk/reward is what’s need. Berserkers /Rampagers/Carrion/Clerics is the definition of that.
It might not happen but it should be considered. Passive stats carrying you is not what this game is about. Risk/reward is what’s need. Berserkers is the definition of that.
Conquest favors bunker gameplay go back to pve man ^^ #pvemeta
Engi seems to have an imbalance of damage to survivability. I do more damage and am more surivivable on my Engi than I am on my Guardian (comparing both bunker specs). It needs a few tweaks, not a total gutting but a few tweaks.
TBH I am a little sick of how strong both Ele and Engi are compared to the other classes. The team with more of them will win 90% of the time.
(edited by Relentliss.2170)
^^ what you just said makes ur post worthless.
Bunker guardian can survive far longer in every situation than engi.
lol GG
Not affiliated with ArenaNet or NCSOFT. No support is provided.
All assets, page layout, visual style belong to ArenaNet and are used solely to replicate the original design and preserve the original look and feel.
Contact /u/e-scrape-artist on reddit if you encounter a bug.