Hammer/Longbow Warrior
What class are you playing? I just made a hammer/longbow warrior last night. I gave as good as I got… But it was my first time playing the setup.
Then don’t 1v1 them. If you can’t beat them and you know you’re at a disadvantage then engage him with friends.
Join them , its PvP it takes 30 sec to make a char.
Join them , its PvP it takes 30 sec to make a char.
best advice, it’s common sense. if you can’t beat them, then join ’em.
It is good advice. Instead of crying about it anymore, I decided to make one. SPVP is much more pleasing now.
Then don’t 1v1 them. If you can’t beat them and you know you’re at a disadvantage then engage him with friends.
so what happens when 5 lb/hm warriors face 5 lb/hm warriors? :s
Just make one, then make someone else convert—spread the love
Master of all Professions
sPvP Rank Dragon – 8 Champ Titles – Ruby Division
Then don’t 1v1 them. If you can’t beat them and you know you’re at a disadvantage then engage him with friends.
so what happens when 5 lb/hm warriors face 5 lb/hm warriors? :s
whoever is the fastest to the cap point wins!
Master of all Professions
sPvP Rank Dragon – 8 Champ Titles – Ruby Division
If you have an issue with a warrior make one and stop QQing about them. Eventually, ARenanet will get the message that shaving around a bald spot doesn’t make the spot go away or painting it doesn’t.
If you are an elementalist, why play it, play warrior, less work and easy kills.
This is an mmo forum, if someone isn’t whining chances are the game is dead.
It’s the same discussion over and over again. Some weeks ago, necro was the “flavor of the month” and you could easiliy find 8 necros against 8 necros in hot joins.
Previously, it was the cantrip elementalist. Earlier, it was the thief. And the list goes on.
Adapt, evolve. I personally find useful kitening them.
Since roles are not clearly defined in the way GW2 was built, like a trinity MMO, a 1 class per team in solo and team Q would make sense so that FOTM doesn’t dominate
If you have an issue with a warrior make one and stop QQing about them. Eventually, ARenanet will get the message that shaving around a bald spot doesn’t make the spot go away or painting it doesn’t.
If you are an elementalist, why play it, play warrior, less work and easy kills.
I’d rather not play that play something boring as hell.
It’d be like if all the skill based and rewarding champs/heroes in LoL/DotA were nerfed to oblivion and only the faceroll stuff was good. Ugh.
If you think Hammer/LB is destroying soloQ, you haven’t seen the new build that has been floating around. The other build is so broken you’d be lucky to get the warrior to even 90% hp before you’re downed. Once it gets more popular, Anet will really have to rethink their approach to balancing warriors.
Edit: I did not mention the details of the other build on purpose. Don’t want it spreading too much.
If you think Hammer/LB is destroying soloQ, you haven’t seen the new build that has been floating around. The other build is so broken you’d be lucky to get the warrior to even 90% hp before you’re downed. Once it gets more popular, Anet will really have to rethink their approach to balancing warriors.
Edit: I did not mention the details of the other build on purpose. Don’t want it spreading too much.
^ Shouts.
Everyone in the top 100 already knows about it.
Just make one until ArenaNet finally realizes it’s an issue and gets to fixing it. Hammer warrior right now is even more disgustingly OP than signet ranger was back in beta.
It’s the same discussion over and over again. Some weeks ago, necro was the “flavor of the month” and you could easiliy find 8 necros against 8 necros in hot joins.
Previously, it was the cantrip elementalist. Earlier, it was the thief. And the list goes on.Adapt, evolve. I personally find useful kitening them.
Agreed. Each month it is just another profession asked to be nerfed..we wanted thief nerfed..now we complain they got nerfed too hard. We wanted ele nerfed and then we complained ele got nerfed too hard. We wanted necro nerf,..they got minor nerfs..we still grumble..we wanted warriors viable..now we want them nerfed…tune in next month when we say they got nerfed too hard…tune in next year when it will be, “Pvp is too hard..we want it nerfed.”
1% of people who bought guild wars 2 play pvp regularly according to their statics. Why even think about balancing a game around 1% of its population when the other 99% are cool with it.