Nerf class
This school is far to repetitive. we have studied the same subject since the grand opening of Nerf Wars high.
Whoever merged these threads…My new hero <3
This school is far to repetitive. we have studied the same subject since the grand opening of Nerf Wars high.
Detention for you!
You never question or disrespect the Nerf School.
Did this really happen? I don’t know how to feel about this..humor?hate?happiness? This forum is something else.
The Dhuumfire thread
How hasn’t this one been moved to the thief subforum, are they worried it would detract them arguing about that guy who has hurts in his rear about getting hit with kill shot?
@OP:
Unless the thief is one of the top 10 in the game, I do not want them on my team. They cause more losses than any other class when I queue solo. So, you want to take a class that isn’t great anyway and nerf it?
Umm no, or nerf it and then write some kind of logic that allows me to never have a thief on my team.
Another interpretation could be, that they renamed Thief class to Nerf class.
Another interpretation could be, that they renamed Thief class to Nerf class.
No, whoever merged the threads simply forgot the word “Needs” at the beginning. It’s the “Needs Nerf” class.
Warlord Sikari (80 Scrapper)
Another interpretation could be, that they renamed Thief class to Nerf class.
No, whoever merged the threads simply forgot the word “Needs” at the beginning. It’s the “Needs Nerf” class.
Nah.
This is definitely either a class on nerfs OR the thief’s new name or spec will be named Nerf.
Another interpretation could be, that they renamed Thief class to Nerf class.
No, whoever merged the threads simply forgot the word “Needs” at the beginning. It’s the “Needs Nerf” class.
Nah.
This is definitely either a class on nerfs OR the thief’s new name or spec will be named Nerf.
Definitely the thief specialisation’s name +1 you can’t have nerf without referring to thief.
The Dhuumfire thread
This is the funniest merge ever. I love which ever mod did this.
Man, it was a fun day on the PvP forums…
thieves want more build versatility when they already rival war in best mobility. ok?
fixed*
Its still a poor statement.
What i’m saying is, maybe thieves that want a better chance in actual fights should not use shortbow, which is a weapon that gives mobility. I know shortbow probably is the best in fights as well at the moment, so what might really be needed are changes to some of the other (non meta) weapons of the thief to make them more attractive in place of shortbow. As long as thieves run shortbow with a targeted teleport built into a weapon, they should be “weaker” in fights.
^ Usually only characer that i play on
Could be a very unnecessary suggestion but what if the ranger’s rapid fire animation was red or something to give a better visual cue when further away.
Another interpretation could be, that they renamed Thief class to Nerf class.
No, whoever merged the threads simply forgot the word “Needs” at the beginning. It’s the “Needs Nerf” class.
Nah.
This is definitely either a class on nerfs OR the thief’s new name or spec will be named Nerf.
I have to laugh: lol
Ankur
Here’s a novel thought:
Tweak/buff traits to draw people away from the SA line.As it is now, we are pigeon holed into SA if we want any legit defense.
I know, I know, makes too much sense…
You’re in the wrong forum section, this is not WvW, the only build that even uses the SA line is Panic Strike D/P and even that one only puts 2 points into that.
So is the OP. What’s your point?
So much for trying to be taken serious though…I mean the OP made a valid suggestion in his eyes,now his thread gets merged with some other thread and renamed into NERF ? Honestly….. Its like, we dont need your kittening suggestions…
So much for trying to be taken serious though…I mean the OP made a valid suggestion in his eyes,now his thread gets merged with some other thread and renamed into NERF ? Honestly….. Its like, we dont need your kittening suggestions…
After setting up 5-7 different flavors of theses why wouldn’t they get merged at least they did just lock them as they could have. This thread (and its parts) are not exactly leading to constructive discussion.