The problem with that bo5 thing is that there are big differences between the maps. I dont know if u realized but with our comp there was no way to win on foefire. In bo5 TP had to win 1x niflhel or khylo and it was over. Before our second match on niflhel i told my team that we need to win this although it was 2:1 for CC cause i knew we gonna loose foefire again. We didnt complain cause after winnig good teams with 2 nec on foefire we felt confident to win TP aswell (big mistake) and after lossing our first match on foefire it was too late to say “öhhhhm guys we dont want to play bo5 anymore”. Thats why super and posi are complaning. No one tried to turn the final into TP favor but unfortunately for us it happend.
it doesn’t change the fact you had another chance to win back in nifhel, when TP lost very often.
You were 2-1, in nifhel ( again, that silly map when TP loses so much and you win so much) you had a chance to go 3-1 and close the match.
Yet you lost, that was your fault.
You agreed playing Bo5 by pressing ready and playing it, chances were fair for both teams ( at least regarding Bo5 scenario), the only “unfair” thing was CC had to play for 5 hours while TP was fresh and clean.
THIS is the real matter and the one you should complain about, because it’s simply not fair.
Altough, tbh, it also happens it soccer tournaments like Fifa World Cup, when the first ones playing semi-finals have 1 more day to rest than the the second ones.
Ofc this tournament had no need for this to happen, they could have easily put your semi-finals tomorrow, and there would not be any problem.
I can feel ya.
Great match anyway, CC is a great team, don’t be such kittens.
dude im not complaining. I would say niflhel is 60%:40% for CC, Foefire is 90% for TP khylo is 50%:50% so bo3 is actually not bad for CC. Best of 5 turns everything cause we couldnt win foefire and TP had a chance to win Niflhel or Khylo. Our second match on Niflhel was very good we won the first teamfight and had 2 points and then TP killed our thief offpoint and Teldo won a 2v1 on far. 2 mistakes and we lost the game. You cant compare that to foefire we couldve stayed in our base cause there was no chance. Im sure we wouldve lost a best of 9 vs NN aswell cause their advantage on foefire is bigger than CCs on niflhel.
TP deserved to win they played amazing im not question that at all.
I just can’t get it.
Bo5 doesn’t change anything, since you have 2 equal scenarios
Bo3
Nifhel -> CC advantage ( slightly)
Foefire -> TP wins
Khylo -> fair
Solution
In a Bo3 scenario, you need to win nifhel, since you know you’re going to lose on foefire.
Everything will be settled on Khylo ( which is a fair map)
Bo5
Nifhel -> CC advantage ( slightly)
Foefire -> TP wins
Khylo -> fair
Nifhel -> CC advantage ( slightly)
Foefire -> TP wins
Solution
In this scenario, everything is AGAIN settled on Khylo.
According to statistics ( those ones you said), you’ll lose in Foefire in any case, so the best is to win both Nifhel ( something you should, since you have a slight advantage).
If you win Khylo, and win both Nifhel ( the map where you are favoured), TP has not even a chance to go back to Foefire, and you “ON PAPER” win easily.
Again, eveything is settled on Khylo.
If anything, winning on Khylo should have given you an advantage.
There’s absolutely nothing different in a Bo3 when compared to a Bo5, the only issue , as i said before, is that you could have been tired due to 5 hours of playing, compared to TP whose were fresh and clean ( and you can say you weren’t, but OF COURSE you were).
Nothing else ( not that it doesn’t matter, it’s a very HUGE issue, but absolutely not the issue you’re referring about).
(edited by Mrbig.8019)