(edited by Zepidel.5349)
Why are TPvP matches allowed to start 4v5?
Because…they don’t have the technology to prevent it. NO ONE DOES! You probably won’t see that software developed for YEARS!!!!!
Before I have to respond with this…THIS IS SARCASM!!!!
what kind of tech are we talking here? Does anet need to steal alien technology from a downed UFO and reverse engineer some kind of flux capacitor to decode the mystery behind this age old question?
inb4 infracted for asking valid questions
Because Anet is playing on the Team with 5
Seems like not a lot of people care.
Seems like not a lot of people care.
No, people care(d).
We have been complaining about matches starting 4v5 since solo queue was originally introduced (last year). Probably longer in older tpvp game modes too, but I didn’t follow the PvP community much before solo queue.
Anet doesn’t fix it.
Many people have given up complaining.
Dragonbrand
Seems like not a lot of people care.
No, people care(d).
We have been complaining about matches starting 4v5 since solo queue was originally introduced (last year). Probably longer in older tpvp game modes too, but I didn’t follow the PvP community much before solo queue.
Anet doesn’t fix it.
Many people have given up complaining.
It seems like they tried to implement it, I’m assuming thats what the “I’m Ready” button was for.
Honestly though, how hard would it be to implement a check that would kill a game instance and throw everyone back into que after the pre game timer runs out and there is only 9/10 people in?
They should pause the game on 4vs5 and add the next person to join solo que before they resume.
They should pause the game on 4vs5 and add the next person to join solo que before they resume.
With no leaving consequence people could abuse this.
Honestly though, how hard would it be to implement a check that would kill a game instance and throw everyone back into que after the pre game timer runs out and there is only 9/10 people in?
That’d be good though that’d naturally require the person that didn’t show up to be punished with a dishonored debuff as otherwise people could abuse this system by joining the match and leaving if they didn’t like whom they were to play against.
With no leaving consequence people could abuse this.
There are leaving consequences though.
After 3 (I think) leavings you get suspended from tPvP for 3 days or something like that.
Krall Bloodsword – Mesmer
Krall Peterson – Warrior
Piken Square
Krall Peterson – Warrior
Piken Square
Dishonor buff is pretty harsh guise.
If you leave a game 5 times (or go AFK for 3+ minutes) within 72 hours you can be removed from tpvp for 3 days.
Everytime you leave/afk you get a ‘tick’ that refreshes every 3 days
Dishonor buff is pretty harsh guise.
If you leave a game 5 times (or go AFK for 3+ minutes) within 72 hours you can be removed from tpvp for 3 days.
Everytime you leave/afk you get a ‘tick’ that refreshes every 3 days
Is it really 5 times? That seems like a lot.
Idk why any matches are allowed to start with uneven teams. Even in hotjoin… yes hotjoin isn’t serious, people farm it for lewtz, monthly wins, etc. by purposefully outnumbering the other team. That’s bad behavior that shouldn’t be rewarded.
Simply only allow players in 2 at a time (one on each team). Que the rest and let them in as pairs.
Bam even teams. No need to tweak the numbers for dishonored etc.
Tarnished Coast
Salvage 4 Profit + MF Guide – http://tinyurl.com/l8ff6pa
Salvage 4 Profit + MF Guide – http://tinyurl.com/l8ff6pa
Apart from me hating dishonored being 3 days at minimum, I will say you are on to something Aberrant.
I feel it gets much worse lately… I only play 3 games a day for dailies… but last week at least 1 of those 3 was 4 vs 5. ’And it would be so simple to just cancel the match and wait for another one… Instead you are forced to play already lost match.
In hotjoin you at least have chance someone might join… in solo arena, you’re already doomed. They may as well add “forfeit” button so that team doesn’t have to spend 15 minutes loosing…