Guild Wars 2

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

append here below the na team arena leader board stats for quick reference.

score 500 team
team arena rank | character name – wins / loses – win ratio %
14 – Casuàlty | 1618 / 618 – 72.36%
15 – Kuruse | 1576 / 384 – 80.41%
17 – Rizzy Treezy | 2623 / 1199 – 68.63%
25 – Baßy T | 622 / 322 – 65.89%
62 – Naomi J | 4046 / 1698 – 70.44%

score 0 team
team arena rank | character name – wins / loses – win ratio %
94% – Tiny Lil Sol | 71 / 53 – 57.26%
92% – Rrif | 36 / 30 – 54.55%
91% – Nira Rior Tel Arin | 33 / 32 – 50.77% (me!)
88% – Tiny Lil Nyx | 31 / 39 – 44.29%
84% – Winter Solitary | 39 / 38 – 50.65%

as you can see, we are ranked around 84% to 94% while the other team are from 62 to 14 so we got our rear ends kicked so hard, our nuts are still vibrating.

also, the warrior haters who kept on claiming that “lesser skilled warrior can beat greater skilled players” is totally wrong. stop it with the whines already.

they are. you’re just bad.

Jae.5138:

they are. you’re just bad.

nope. warriors are not overpowered.
would you kindly please get that over with already?

we are okay by the way.
come battle us in team arena if you will.

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

;)

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

Outplayed.

10/10 thread.

By these standards, my 3 mesmer 1 Necro (MM), 1 Guardian comp was the most broken thing imaginable with how badly we stomped in soloQ. You know except for the fact that it was only because the enemy team constantly sent people to 1v1 an MM and couldn’t take mid once. But it probably wasn’t that, it was just that mesmers are so OP.

I’ve rarely seen a worse reasoning than the OP’s, but hey, this world never ceases to surprise me.

Jae.5138:

they are. you’re just bad.

Deyum…Elaine, Jose, Reikou, Rizla, and Jtan went Hayummmmm.

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

;)

hmmm i disagree with this statement. doesn’t matter. warriors are not overpowered but unfortunately the warriors haters just won’t stop crying.

dank.3680:

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

Outplayed.

yes, we were outplayed. the 500 team were mostly dragon players and have much more experience than our team. on our casual team we have a bear, a tiger, a wolf and 2 dollies.

Bhawb.7408:

10/10 thread.

By these standards, my 3 mesmer 1 Necro (MM), 1 Guardian comp was the most broken thing imaginable with how badly we stomped in soloQ. You know except for the fact that it was only because the enemy team constantly sent people to 1v1 an MM and couldn’t take mid once. But it probably wasn’t that, it was just that mesmers are so OP.

hmmm i dun understand what you are trying to say.

hihey.1075:

I’ve rarely seen a worse reasoning than the OP’s, but hey, this world never ceases to surprise me.

what are you talking about? my reasoning is perfect.

because this reasoning “warriors will never be overpowered because warriors can be outplayed by better experienced and skilled players” cannot be refuted ever.

infantrydiv.1620:

Jae.5138:

they are. you’re just bad.

nope. i disagree. the other team was simply more experienced and skilled than ours.

by your definition, you are also “bad” when you face off teams better than yourself.

YourFriendMarvin.4127:

Deyum…Elaine, Jose, Reikou, Rizla, and Jtan went Hayummmmm.

hmmm sorry i dun get what you are trying to say.

Whoops I meant Elaine, Jose, Reikou, Rizla, and Casualty went Ham. Fixed

YourFriendMarvin.4127:

Whoops I meant Elaine, Jose, Reikou, Rizla, and Casualty went Ham. Fixed

ooo okay so you were referring to the players in the 500 team!

but what does it mean by “went Ham” then? O_O

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

SOOOO lyrical.

It means they took advantage of every mistake you guys made and snowballed you

Teckos.1305:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

SOOOO lyrical.

ooo thanks for the compliment!

Inscrutable.8347:

It means they took advantage of every mistake you guys made and snowballed you

actually no, we did not make any mistakes.
errr they just melted us before we have any chance to make any mistakes.
and then they spawn camped us.

4 of us have 0 personal score for quite some time.
no rewards if we have 0 personal points at the end of the match.
nearing the end, i got 10 personal points by planting a banner to revive someone.
then another friend got her 10 personal points with a successful commune, probably ferocity. once she got it the match ended at 500 – 0

after we got steam rolled real good at the start, my only concern was getting some personal points so we would at least get some minimal rewards. so i’m very happy that everyone got some personal points to qualify for the end match rewards.

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

;)

hmmm i disagree with this statement. doesn’t matter. warriors are not overpowered but unfortunately the warriors haters just won’t stop crying.

dank.3680:

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

Outplayed.

yes, we were outplayed. the 500 team were mostly dragon players and have much more experience than our team. on our casual team we have a bear, a tiger, a wolf and 2 dollies.

Bhawb.7408:

10/10 thread.

By these standards, my 3 mesmer 1 Necro (MM), 1 Guardian comp was the most broken thing imaginable with how badly we stomped in soloQ. You know except for the fact that it was only because the enemy team constantly sent people to 1v1 an MM and couldn’t take mid once. But it probably wasn’t that, it was just that mesmers are so OP.

hmmm i dun understand what you are trying to say.

hihey.1075:

I’ve rarely seen a worse reasoning than the OP’s, but hey, this world never ceases to surprise me.

what are you talking about? my reasoning is perfect.

because this reasoning “warriors will never be overpowered because warriors can be outplayed by better experienced and skilled players” cannot be refuted ever.

infantrydiv.1620:

Jae.5138:

they are. you’re just bad.

nope. i disagree. the other team was simply more experienced and skilled than ours.

by your definition, you are also “bad” when you face off teams better than yourself.

YourFriendMarvin.4127:

Deyum…Elaine, Jose, Reikou, Rizla, and Jtan went Hayummmmm.

hmmm sorry i dun get what you are trying to say.

I guess nobody wants to put you out of your misery, so I leave you with these questions: What happens when an experienced player plays war vs an equally skilled x-profession? Who outplays who?

XGhoul.7426:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

;)

hmmm i disagree with this statement. doesn’t matter. warriors are not overpowered but unfortunately the warriors haters just won’t stop crying.

dank.3680:

Rubik.7192:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Rubik.7192:

“I got outplayed by much better players, warrior must not be strong”

exactly, and this is the reason why warriors are not overpowered.

because, if warriors are overpowered, we would overwhelmed the much better players. but this is not the case, so, warriors are not overpowered.

Or you could be so terrible that even the warrior class could not carry you.

Outplayed.

yes, we were outplayed. the 500 team were mostly dragon players and have much more experience than our team. on our casual team we have a bear, a tiger, a wolf and 2 dollies.

Bhawb.7408:

10/10 thread.

By these standards, my 3 mesmer 1 Necro (MM), 1 Guardian comp was the most broken thing imaginable with how badly we stomped in soloQ. You know except for the fact that it was only because the enemy team constantly sent people to 1v1 an MM and couldn’t take mid once. But it probably wasn’t that, it was just that mesmers are so OP.

hmmm i dun understand what you are trying to say.

hihey.1075:

I’ve rarely seen a worse reasoning than the OP’s, but hey, this world never ceases to surprise me.

what are you talking about? my reasoning is perfect.

because this reasoning “warriors will never be overpowered because warriors can be outplayed by better experienced and skilled players” cannot be refuted ever.

infantrydiv.1620:

Jae.5138:

they are. you’re just bad.

nope. i disagree. the other team was simply more experienced and skilled than ours.

by your definition, you are also “bad” when you face off teams better than yourself.

YourFriendMarvin.4127:

Deyum…Elaine, Jose, Reikou, Rizla, and Jtan went Hayummmmm.

hmmm sorry i dun get what you are trying to say.

I guess nobody wants to put you out of your misery, so I leave you with these questions: What happens when an experienced player plays war vs an equally skilled x-profession? Who outplays who?

nah i’m enjoying the company here, no worries.

“What happens when an experienced player plays war vs an equally skilled x-profession?”
^ i dunno but i think it kinda heavily depends on what the x-profession is. also depends on the warrior build as well.

“Who outplays who?”
^ if both are equally skilled then i think it will depends strongly on what builds they are running. rocks papers scissors mechanics.

hmmmm so how i did for the quiz?

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Teckos.1305:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

SOOOO lyrical.

ooo thanks for the compliment!

Inscrutable.8347:

It means they took advantage of every mistake you guys made and snowballed you

actually no, we did not make any mistakes.
errr they just melted us before we have any chance to make any mistakes.
and then they spawn camped us.

4 of us have 0 personal score for quite some time.
no rewards if we have 0 personal points at the end of the match.
nearing the end, i got 10 personal points by planting a banner to revive someone.
then another friend got her 10 personal points with a successful commune, probably ferocity. once she got it the match ended at 500 – 0

after we got steam rolled real good at the start, my only concern was getting some personal points so we would at least get some minimal rewards. so i’m very happy that everyone got some personal points to qualify for the end match rewards.

It’s pretty hard to take you seriously not gonna lie.

Ty for the laugh.

Idk why I browse forums honestly. Discourse is so kitten rare here.

Inscrutable.8347:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Teckos.1305:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

SOOOO lyrical.

ooo thanks for the compliment!

Inscrutable.8347:

It means they took advantage of every mistake you guys made and snowballed you

actually no, we did not make any mistakes.
errr they just melted us before we have any chance to make any mistakes.
and then they spawn camped us.

4 of us have 0 personal score for quite some time.
no rewards if we have 0 personal points at the end of the match.
nearing the end, i got 10 personal points by planting a banner to revive someone.
then another friend got her 10 personal points with a successful commune, probably ferocity. once she got it the match ended at 500 – 0

after we got steam rolled real good at the start, my only concern was getting some personal points so we would at least get some minimal rewards. so i’m very happy that everyone got some personal points to qualify for the end match rewards.

It’s pretty hard to take you seriously not gonna lie.

aye thanks for being honest but why would it be hard to take me seriously? O_O

DiamondMeteor.8345:

Ty for the laugh.

Idk why I browse forums honestly. Discourse is so kitten rare here.

heheehe you’re welcome!

well you browse the forums maybe you wanna look for some laughs?

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

yes, we were outplayed. the 500 team were mostly dragon players and have much more experience than our team. on our casual team we have a bear, a tiger, a wolf and 2 dollies.

I think your image easily proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Warrior is OP. And not only that, but that a Warrior can easily choose any teammate such as a Necromancer, and carry them into being a top scorer.

The ‘Outplayed’ comment was in reference to the forums, not the game.

I am kind of curious who would not run beserker stance vs a team with a necro and engi.

If you are going to make a comment about how un-OP the class is, you should try and run the right utilities and before you say this is proof warriors are not OP, warrior without berserker stance is like bunker guard without “stand your ground”.

hehk.8705:

I am kind of curious who would not run beserker stance vs a team with a necro and engi.

If you are going to make a comment about how un-OP the class is, you should try and run the right utilities and before you say this is proof warriors are not OP, warrior without berserker stance is like bunker guard without “stand your ground”.

I completely agree

dank.3680:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

yes, we were outplayed. the 500 team were mostly dragon players and have much more experience than our team. on our casual team we have a bear, a tiger, a wolf and 2 dollies.

I think your image easily proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Warrior is OP. And not only that, but that a Warrior can easily choose any teammate such as a Necromancer, and carry them into being a top scorer.

The ‘Outplayed’ comment was in reference to the forums, not the game.

what? what are you talking about? i dun understand.

hehk.8705:

I am kind of curious who would not run beserker stance vs a team with a necro and engi.

If you are going to make a comment about how un-OP the class is, you should try and run the right utilities and before you say this is proof warriors are not OP, warrior without berserker stance is like bunker guard without “stand your ground”.

oh, i thought cleansing ire is enough to handle the situation.

carrying zerker stance means i need to press another button.
i’ll rather take loss than do that.

HehkEU.9430:

hehk.8705:

I am kind of curious who would not run beserker stance vs a team with a necro and engi.

If you are going to make a comment about how un-OP the class is, you should try and run the right utilities and before you say this is proof warriors are not OP, warrior without berserker stance is like bunker guard without “stand your ground”.

I completely agree

hurrr durrr me casual player no uses zerker stance.

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Inscrutable.8347:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Teckos.1305:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

SOOOO lyrical.

ooo thanks for the compliment!

Inscrutable.8347:

It means they took advantage of every mistake you guys made and snowballed you

actually no, we did not make any mistakes.
errr they just melted us before we have any chance to make any mistakes.
and then they spawn camped us.

4 of us have 0 personal score for quite some time.
no rewards if we have 0 personal points at the end of the match.
nearing the end, i got 10 personal points by planting a banner to revive someone.
then another friend got her 10 personal points with a successful commune, probably ferocity. once she got it the match ended at 500 – 0

after we got steam rolled real good at the start, my only concern was getting some personal points so we would at least get some minimal rewards. so i’m very happy that everyone got some personal points to qualify for the end match rewards.

It’s pretty hard to take you seriously not gonna lie.

aye thanks for being honest but why would it be hard to take me seriously? O_O

DiamondMeteor.8345:

Ty for the laugh.

Idk why I browse forums honestly. Discourse is so kitten rare here.

heheehe you’re welcome!

well you browse the forums maybe you wanna look for some laughs?

Because you’re talking about personal score like it matters and have no idea why you got annihilated. Your team’s “example” of how warriors are not OP is nonsensical.

Inscrutable.8347:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Inscrutable.8347:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

Teckos.1305:

Deimos Tel Arin.7391:

<sarcasm>triple warrior team is so powerful, we 500 – 0 the other team!</sarcasm>
oh wait we’re on the 0 team …

…

…

…

tl; dr warriors are not overpowered.

SOOOO lyrical.

ooo thanks for the compliment!

Inscrutable.8347:

It means they took advantage of every mistake you guys made and snowballed you

actually no, we did not make any mistakes.
errr they just melted us before we have any chance to make any mistakes.
and then they spawn camped us.

4 of us have 0 personal score for quite some time.
no rewards if we have 0 personal points at the end of the match.
nearing the end, i got 10 personal points by planting a banner to revive someone.
then another friend got her 10 personal points with a successful commune, probably ferocity. once she got it the match ended at 500 – 0

after we got steam rolled real good at the start, my only concern was getting some personal points so we would at least get some minimal rewards. so i’m very happy that everyone got some personal points to qualify for the end match rewards.

It’s pretty hard to take you seriously not gonna lie.

aye thanks for being honest but why would it be hard to take me seriously? O_O

DiamondMeteor.8345:

Ty for the laugh.

Idk why I browse forums honestly. Discourse is so kitten rare here.

heheehe you’re welcome!

well you browse the forums maybe you wanna look for some laughs?

Because you’re talking about personal score like it matters and have no idea why you got annihilated. Your team’s “example” of how warriors are not OP is nonsensical.

personal score matters for the end match reward, if our personal score is zero, we dun get any rank points, silvers, progress towards the reward tracks.
casual player mindset, this is.

well, we got annihilated because the other team is more experienced and running better builds than ours.

no, my example is a very good example of why warriors are not overpowered. it is certainly not nonsensical.

my original argument still stands tall, warriors are not overpowered.

Deimos you have always considered yourself are a casual player.
so casual that u do not even try to counter enemys composition with berserker stance.
or ‘want to press an extra button’ at that.

The team you were playing against had some pretty good players,
and that is why they won.

As a casual player you have no business commenting on the balance of competitive play.

Though i agree warrior is not extremely op, it is one of the best classes atm, and brings alot to the team, you could even say its crucial to the team team. No more op than a guard or a thief though imo.

dday.9532:

Deimos you have always considered yourself are a casual player.
so casual that u do not even try to counter enemys composition with berserker stance.
or ‘want to press an extra button’ at that.

The team you were playing against had some pretty good players,
and that is why they won.

As a casual player you have no business commenting on the balance of competitive play.

Though i agree warrior is not extremely op, it is one of the best classes atm, and brings alot to the team, you could even say its crucial to the team team. No more op than a guard or a thief though imo.

yeah i’m pretty casual. our casual team can fight decently against other teams with similar skill level though.

oooo okies. i dun solo / team arena very often so i dunno their names.

hmmm this, i disagree! well, you may say that i “have no business commenting on the balance of competitive play” but that does not stop me from voicing out! the game is balanced around casual players after all heheh.

ya, i love warrior! well, warriors are certainly easy to play. i tried other professions but still feel that warrior is the best to play for me.

was the other way around., was fun game tho gg.

someone killed my terrormancer yesterday, buff terrormancer. /logic

It’s odd how people are so quick to dismiss what the OP is trying to say by belittling his capabilities. This by the very same people who also claim that the warrior is easy to play.

Either a class is easy to play or it isn’t. When an overpowered class is easy to play, there’s very little room for underperforming on said class.

Claiming this is no evidence and in fact insisting on saying the class is overpowered and the OP and both other warriors are simply incapable of performing at an average level with an easy to play class, is a logical fallacy.

There we have it friends; definite proof that warrior isnt OP.

wow 0 pts?! This just shows that you and your team are complete trash.

Locuz.2651:

There we have it friends; definite proof that warrior isnt OP.

Proof that warrior isn’t op? No.

Evidence that warrior can be countered by some of the classes on the other team? Definitely.

Proof that the OP and his friends are just terrible to the point that running 3 overpowered classes results in a 0:500? Ridiculous.

Most people QQing about warriors are beyond bad. Not even smart enough to realize that its safe to play hambow and not because its OP. Several teams said there’s better team comps than double warrior.

Slim.3024:

It’s odd how people are so quick to dismiss what the OP is trying to say by belittling his capabilities. This by the very same people who also claim that the warrior is easy to play.

personally i think they’re trolling or its fake, we all play the game, we all know of the damage, sustainability and cc that warrior has, it is op.

so there really is no explanation how anyone could lose 500-0 with 3 of them unless that person has never played a game before and doesn’t even know how to move their character.

This has nothing to do with the difference in experience between both teams…nahhh

Its not like the other team has multiple former top 10 players (with 1000’s of games played) while they dont have a single person with decent high end experience.

Noticed a HUGE, HUGE drop in number of players playing warriors in sPvP since the 15.4.14.

So a lot of players have been put off playing warriors by the nerfs to them in that patch. That’s my impression anyway.

I think the warrior haters need to find a new character class to hate upon and get nerfed.

A random team against a premade that consists of top ladderboard people. Even with warriors you had no chance. Anyway, if it was some decent, also premade but not top team and they had 3 warriors, they would have won that match, instead of losing so shamefully 500-0

thanks everyone for the feedback! glorious!
oh by the way,

Baßy T – Team Arena Rank 24
Rizzy Treezy – Team Arena Rank 16
Casuàlty – Team Arena Rank 15
Naomi J – Team Arena Rank 55
5th member i dunno what team arena rank

for all those players commenting about how bad we are, i would like you to fight a team with members from the top of the leader board and then come back and report.

JTan.1687:

was the other way around., was fun game tho gg.

aaaah so you are Naomi J the engineer! your conditions too stronk! we melted in seconds!

Liewec.2896:

someone killed my terrormancer yesterday, buff terrormancer. /logic

hmmm how do terror necro works by the way? there are not many skills to instill fear. oh i am not asking for warriors to be buffed. i am attempting to justify that warriors are not overpowered.

Slim.3024:

It’s odd how people are so quick to dismiss what the OP is trying to say by belittling his capabilities. This by the very same people who also claim that the warrior is easy to play.

Either a class is easy to play or it isn’t. When an overpowered class is easy to play, there’s very little room for underperforming on said class.

Claiming this is no evidence and in fact insisting on saying the class is overpowered and the OP and both other warriors are simply incapable of performing at an average level with an easy to play class, is a logical fallacy.

aaah thanks for the support! err i guess. by the way, the team that we faced off have 4 members from the top 55 of the leaderboard so it is natural that we get our rear end handed to us.

i posted the pic in our casual guild’s facebook group and my deputy commented
“wow. your kitten got kicked so hard, your nuts must still be vibrating.”

Locuz.2651:

There we have it friends; definite proof that warrior isnt OP.

eheheheh thanks!

Prophet.1038:

wow 0 pts?! This just shows that you and your team are complete trash.

4 of them are in top 55 of the team arena leader board. how about you try matching up with them and see how many points you can score.

Slim.3024:

Locuz.2651:

There we have it friends; definite proof that warrior isnt OP.

Proof that warrior isn’t op? No.

Evidence that warrior can be countered by some of the classes on the other team? Definitely.

Proof that the OP and his friends are just terrible to the point that running 3 overpowered classes results in a 0:500? Ridiculous.

hurrrr durrr we’re not terrible durrrr its just that they are too good.

a t s e.9614:

Most people QQing about warriors are beyond bad. Not even smart enough to realize that its safe to play hambow and not because its OP. Several teams said there’s better team comps than double warrior.

aye them warrior haters never gonna stop hating!

Liewec.2896:

Slim.3024:

It’s odd how people are so quick to dismiss what the OP is trying to say by belittling his capabilities. This by the very same people who also claim that the warrior is easy to play.

personally i think they’re trolling or its fake, we all play the game, we all know of the damage, sustainability and cc that warrior has, it is op.

so there really is no explanation how anyone could lose 500-0 with 3 of them unless that person has never played a game before and doesn’t even know how to move their character.

try fighting a team with 4 members from the top 55 of the team arena leader board. come back and then report your results with us.

Locuz.2651:

This has nothing to do with the difference in experience between both teams…nahhh

Its not like the other team has multiple former top 10 players (with 1000’s of games played) while they dont have a single person with decent high end experience.

hnggggggghhhh former top 10 players 1000+ arena games hnngghhruukk no wonder.

kitten, my nuts are still vibrating!

Meglobob.8620:

Noticed a HUGE, HUGE drop in number of players playing warriors in sPvP since the 15.4.14.

So a lot of players have been put off playing warriors by the nerfs to them in that patch. That’s my impression anyway.

I think the warrior haters need to find a new character class to hate upon and get nerfed.

unfortunately them warrior haters will not stop and just want warriors to be free easier kills again.

Rezz.8019:

A random team against a premade that consists of top ladderboard people. Even with warriors you had no chance. Anyway, if it was some decent, also premade but not top team and they had 3 warriors, they would have won that match, instead of losing so shamefully 500-0

oh, we’re not a random team by the way, we’re a casual guild team with voice communication on our home world’s ts3 server doing some casual team arena runs every night.

we fight well against other groups with similar skill level to ours but this team is way out of our league. their skills and experience are far too superior.

You are mediocre players and you went up against a good team.

There is no class composition on either side that would have allowed you to win.

So turning that into ANY correlation to what class is OP or not, is just silly.

Solstice wins. /Thread

OP is completely right, who would want a warrior the most overnerfed class in the game.. Mesmers are so overpowered they have to get nerfed or warriors have to get buffed, they gotta buff eviscerate 7k isn’t nearly enough, we have to be able to kill mesmers just like everybody else,
You don’t know what it’s like! Warriors are easy for mesmers.

Solstice.1097:

You are mediocre players and you went up against a good team.

There is no class composition on either side that would have allowed you to win.

So turning that into ANY correlation to what class is OP or not, is just silly.

Here’s the problem. Why is it flawed to say “warriors are not OP because we had three and lost anyway”, but not flawed to say “warriors are OP because some team had two and won a tournament”?

What’s the difference in the logic?

Corian.4068:

Here’s the problem. Why is it flawed to say “warriors are not OP because we had three and lost anyway”, but not flawed to say “warriors are OP because some team had two and won a tournament”?

What’s the difference in the logic?

Since there is an obvious difference in skill and experience between your team and theirs.

The teams in the later rounds of that tournament can all be considered top tier, so the skill and experience level is relatively equal.

How did you even manage not to get a single point is a puzzle to me.

Corian.4068:

Solstice.1097:

You are mediocre players and you went up against a good team.

There is no class composition on either side that would have allowed you to win.

So turning that into ANY correlation to what class is OP or not, is just silly.

Here’s the problem. Why is it flawed to say “warriors are not OP because we had three and lost anyway”, but not flawed to say “warriors are OP because some team had two and won a tournament”?

What’s the difference in the logic?

the flaw is that if skill level and experience aren’t relatively equal then class composition has nothing to do with who wins.