Changing the limits to WvW
Nothing will change. Buy gems to transfer is Anets solution.
Tacktical Killers [TK]
We’re looking for players.
PM me here or ING.
And what would the other 70 active players from server A and the other 30 from server B do? Play EotM? I know its frustrating to be outnumbered all the time, but your idea really is an unfair solution to the community as whole.
WvW Rank 3800 (Platinum Veteran) – PvP Rank 69 (Shark) – 25,9k Achievment Points
Mërcenaries [Sold] – Ferguson’s Crossing
Crying,Crying everywhere. If you don’t like it, change server and stop complaining.
Burzakonis – Leader of Encrypted [EPIC]
And what would the other 70 active players from server A and the other 30 from server B do? Play EotM? I know its frustrating to be outnumbered all the time, but your idea really is an unfair solution to the community as whole.
I would agree if the cap is base on the lowest active server what should the other active player do wait in queue?
We should base on the highest active server. If Server A have 100 active players, B has 60, and C has 30. Server A should match with Server B+C combine and another server about the same size. I think this system is more fair than the current system we have. Server should be rate at it’s latest weekly man hour.
What if instead of wvwvw, it’s wvw with 4 servers where both teams consists of one large server and one smaller server? Wouldn’t it be interesting to team up with your rival server? lol
The Legion of Charrs [TLC] – Fort Aspenwood’s Finest Charr Guild
You can’t spell Fur Affinity without FA! :3