Guild Wars 2

Chaosbroker.3860:

Dhampyr.2104:

LOL Did I read that right? Aurust on TC? That’s kinda funny. xD

Yep … and the more you think about it the funnier it gets.

Stahp talking about me!!!!

I am not having this kittened conversation with you, SF admits to zerging, if DH wants to act like they run around in skill groups: whatevs brah. Just remember things are a lot more clear from the other side of the fence….IE: I have farmed enough of your uplevel pugs in the mass of Map Zergs you have to know better.

SF runs a few skill groups themselves, but most people wouldn’t argue they don’t do their fair share of Pug zerging..Apparently I have touched a nerve with the DH zerging thing..How would you feel if I called you out on the continuous PVdooring that gets done every NA morning on your server lol??? The CoSA thing is played out, Cosa is Cosa because people like them and they are generally good folks that don’t turn away anyone that wants to run with them.

TBH DH was always the one server SF claimed was full of Pug zerglings…something that SF has been routinely accused of…So really its just an argument of “who does it more” and it’s one I care nothing about continuing.

Tl/Dr: Just because you or a few of your buds think you are roamers/skillgroups now on DH does not change the fact that the majority of your servermates are mindless zerglings.

I’ve readily admitted, multiple times in multiple places (see your quote of me in the next post you make) that Dh is hyper zergy. But you said it’s a toss up as to who is more zergy, Dh or SF. Thus it’s kind of weird that you’d say you’re not interesting in having a discussion about who is more zergy… when you started that precise discussion. SF is clearly far more zergy. Zergy though Dh may be, SF has always been and will probably always be the king of zergs in t6-8.

Also I’m not even saying Dh is more skilled… quite the opposite. I believe SF has more skilled zergs and Dh has more skilled roamers. So each side, I think, has their strengths and weaknesses.

Arius.7031:

But you said it’s a toss up as to who is more zergy, Dh or SF. Thus it’s kind of weird that you’d say you’re not interesting in having a discussion about who is more zergy…

Yes, it is pretty straightforward really…You made a wildly subjective comment, I made another subjective (though IMO much more believable) comment in reply…Does not call for a discussion, because it is based largely on subjective viewpoints.

People can’t even agree on how many people were in whatever zvz fight on a given night with screenshots provided….There is no way to think we could hash out which server is “the king of zergs”…Which speaks to why I made my original comment/reply in the first place.

It was a silly thing for you to say given the server you sit on, regardless of your level of play or your friends, and it smacked of hypocrisy (again subjective on my part I know). If you were on the lowest pop server and said ____ server is the king of zergy servers, then it would hold a bit more merit, but would still have a high probability of being subjective.

In the end, my point was it would be silly for BG to argue that JQ zergs more, just as it would for SF and DH to argue it….It is apparent both sets of examples have many more participants than their neighboring (lower)tiered counterparts, so to attempt to put an accurate measure on it through discussion would be moot.

Deli.1302:

Wagonbrand won’t work a 2nd time coz they only have 2 consistent sea guilds now. Back then they had 4-5.

But, they got a lot of transfers to their NA side, and that is why they moved back into t3 (and yaks lost people).

They don’t have the numbers of MAG, SOS, or FA, but they severely outnumber SBI and SoR.

King Amadaeus.8619:

Arius.7031:

But you said it’s a toss up as to who is more zergy, Dh or SF. Thus it’s kind of weird that you’d say you’re not interesting in having a discussion about who is more zergy…

Yes, it is pretty straightforward really…You made a wildly subjective comment, I made another subjective (though IMO much more believable) comment in reply…Does not call for a discussion, because it is based largely on subjective viewpoints.

People can’t even agree on how many people were in whatever zvz fight on a given night with screenshots provided….There is no way to think we could hash out which server is “the king of zergs”…Which speaks to why I made my original comment/reply in the first place.

It was a silly thing for you to say given the server you sit on, regardless of your level of play or your friends, and it smacked of hypocrisy (again subjective on my part I know). If you were on the lowest pop server and said ____ server is the king of zergy servers, then it would hold a bit more merit, but would still have a high probability of being subjective.

In the end, my point was it would be silly for BG to argue that JQ zergs more, just as it would for SF and DH to argue it….It is apparent both sets of examples have many more participants than their neighboring (lower)tiered counterparts, so to attempt to put an accurate measure on it through discussion would be moot.

Shut up and let me eat my hot pocket.

Also, new thread about server reputations, Dh hasn’t even been mentioned, SF has been mentioned twice as a ganking/zergy server (three times now that I joined it >:D). Fun facts.

Ahh this SF vs DH (and sf vs HoD) argument reminds me off the good ole days of forum warrioring in the match up forums.

I would totally get in involved but whats the point anymore?

Arius.7031:

King Amadaeus.8619:

Arius.7031:

But you said it’s a toss up as to who is more zergy, Dh or SF. Thus it’s kind of weird that you’d say you’re not interesting in having a discussion about who is more zergy…

Yes, it is pretty straightforward really…You made a wildly subjective comment, I made another subjective (though IMO much more believable) comment in reply…Does not call for a discussion, because it is based largely on subjective viewpoints.

People can’t even agree on how many people were in whatever zvz fight on a given night with screenshots provided….There is no way to think we could hash out which server is “the king of zergs”…Which speaks to why I made my original comment/reply in the first place.

It was a silly thing for you to say given the server you sit on, regardless of your level of play or your friends, and it smacked of hypocrisy (again subjective on my part I know). If you were on the lowest pop server and said ____ server is the king of zergy servers, then it would hold a bit more merit, but would still have a high probability of being subjective.

In the end, my point was it would be silly for BG to argue that JQ zergs more, just as it would for SF and DH to argue it….It is apparent both sets of examples have many more participants than their neighboring (lower)tiered counterparts, so to attempt to put an accurate measure on it through discussion would be moot.

Shut up and let me eat my hot pocket.

Also, new thread about server reputations, Dh hasn’t even been mentioned, SF has been mentioned twice as a ganking/zergy server (three times now that I joined it >:D). Fun facts.

Yep mentioned in large part by people from FC that are kitten their PPTing tryhardness isn’t working in their current match, nor are their karma training oceanics they picked up….

Also I have seen 2-3 post today from people ON FC, complaining about their server turning into PUG zergs and PPT crying in map chat.

In case you missed it, I said that one server arguing another is “zergy” or who is more “zergy” is kittened.

Leviathan.8029:

There are some things said I want to clear up about IRON

IRON destroyed Desolation

Yes, yes we did

IRON destroyed SoR

This one is a bit of a discussion really.
IRON left the server, big gap in EU timeslot
NA incompetence, big gap in NA timeslot
SEA/OCX low numbers compared to JQ/BG, big gap in SEA/OCX timeslot

You could say we had something to do with it

Reverence.6915:

IRON used to near queue a map by themselves

This one made me giggle. The lack of knowledge some people have about us.
IRON is a very, very big guild, with very active players. Not only did we queue A map, we queued all.. Including many PvE maps and Lion’s Arch. All on our own.
If another group wanted to come on a map, they had to pay us.. How on earth did you guys think our commanders could afford all those Superior Flame Rams for the wooden towers all over WvW

In all seriousness, we enjoy killing servers. We plan to kill all servers.
Gunnar’s Hold is in the works and we are already planning our next kill!

Be prepared!!

Actually, Desolation is doing great now; it’s actually FUN to play there. More and more keep incoming every day, including me.