(edited by Hexxen.7216)
Problem Solved. ^^
AFAIK, it’s doing damage that causes revealed – so if you blocked the attacks, the thief wasn’t doing damage and wouldn’t get revealed. I think it’s the same when we summon phantasms from stealth – I’m not entirely sure (since I do it in WvW when everything is chaos anyway), but the phant summon (and its subsequent damage caused by its attack) doesn’t break my stealth either.
Tarnished Coast
I understand our phantasms not revealing us. The act of summoning isn’t really an “attack” then the attack of the phantasm itself isn’t actually coming from us.
Really my main issue/question was if I was going crazy or something that my torment was never applying on her when I blocked her when she was in stealth.
(Even though I think a block should totally reveal you.)
(edited by Hexxen.7216)
Ah, I missed that part – and I’m assuming you mean torment? All I can think is what you already mentioned – the condi clear in stealth got rid of it.
And agree completely, block should reveal the stealthed person.
Tarnished Coast
Totally meant Torment sorry, was reading necro forums earlier.
I run a condition build though and rarely have only one condition on them at a time. Is Terror even higher priority for removal than Confusion? Either way I really want a Thief friend to test this with. ^^
To become revealed you need to:
- Use a damaging attack.
- It has to connect.
The issue with Blocking is that it removes the second part. But OTOH, the immunity PvE mobs have still lets attacks connect (i.e.: clones spawn from Scepter autoattack, even if it deals no damage), so you get revealed if you stealth-attack those.
OK, we got the revealed part down. Even though I still think block should reveal you. ^^
Anyone else notice the Torment issue with Scepter or have an easier time to be able to test it properly?
Just tested it in the Mists. 100% put Torment on the target. It was a controlled test. So I guess that Thief had the condition cleans while in stealth even though I just can’t believe how luck she was getting. Maybe they did make Torment rather high priority even more so than confusion.
Reveal should initiate when a person decides to “attack”. There should be a penalty even if you’re blinded or aegised.
It’s ridiculous to be …… oh I miss that 8k backstab never mind I’ll try that again, oh I miss again never mind I’ll do it again and oh again? ok never mind I’ll do it again…
STUPID
Did you land the torment counter-attack on the Thief after blocking with Illusionary Counter? Because it’s perfectly possible that the Thief dodged right after you blocked the attack and would therefore not be hit with the Torment on the counter.
And yes, all blocked attacks should reveal anyone in stealth.
(edited by Simonoly.4352)
Someone might be able to do that but this thief was for sure not skilled enough.
I believe condition cleanses work on a first on-last-out basis; Eg: I apply Burning on you, then Torment, and you use Mender’s Purity. Torment is removed since it was the last condition put on you. At least, I think that’s how it works. This should be easy to test though.
As a mesmer, stand nearby your clones and when you block, the attack lands on them, revealing the thief.
As a mesmer, stand nearby your clones and when you block, the attack lands on them, revealing the thief.
Really? Hmm I must admit did not know this. ^^
IIRC for this, it needs to be a cleaving attack. I don’t think backstab fall into this category, does it?
Normally yes, but if you can make the Thief backstab your clone, then he’s revealed and you can /laugh at him