9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Oglaf.1074

Oglaf.1074

… on my Longbow. I am not otherwise traited or geared for Condition Damage, but I also realize that the Longbow is generous with Burning.

So, given these circumstances would you go for Berserker’s or Rampager’s?

I can do thirty Five-Dolyak Arm Curls.

Do you even lift, bro?

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Formana.9283

Formana.9283

The auto attack and Arcing Arrow will benefit much more Berserker stats. As you’ve said, you are not traited or geared for CD, why go for it? I personally tried it, and from experience, I can say that the Crits from Arcing Arrow will be much more devastating than the Burning from Fan of Fire and Combusting Shot.

Fray Formana – Warrior
Bear Hat | Tom Cruise | Chuck Norris
[Urge] Blackgate – Commander | Warrior Question? Mail me! :D

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Beefcake.9032

Beefcake.9032

According to this: http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Condition_Damage
Burning = 5% of Condition Damage
That means you’re improving your condition damage by 7 per tick.

I’d go for crit dmg.

Wrainbash, Asura Warrior of Kodasch Allianz [KoA]
Du spielst auf Kodasch? Besuche doch mal die Kodasch Community Webseite! :)

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Oglaf.1074

Oglaf.1074

Berserker’s it is!

I can do thirty Five-Dolyak Arm Curls.

Do you even lift, bro?

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Mumu.6203

Mumu.6203

Forget about condition damage if you’re not geared for it
With 130 CD you’ll only gain +32 dmg per tick on your burning skills ….

Go full condition damage or not at all, the “in between” option is not worth it IMO

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Beefcake.9032

Beefcake.9032

According to this: http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Condition_Damage
Burning = 5% of Condition Damage
That means you’re improving your condition damage by 7 per tick.

I’d go for crit dmg.

Whoops, made an error.

Burning = 25% of Condition Damage

Mumu is correct, this equals 32 dmg per tick.

Wrainbash, Asura Warrior of Kodasch Allianz [KoA]
Du spielst auf Kodasch? Besuche doch mal die Kodasch Community Webseite! :)

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Schwahrheit.4203

Schwahrheit.4203

Yeah Berserker seems to be the only viable set for DPS weapons.

Since people are negative about nerfs, how about we buff to balance then?

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Oglaf.1074

Oglaf.1074

Yeah Berserker seems to be the only viable set for DPS weapons.

I prefer Knight’s to Berserker’s usually, but I reckon that for a secondary ranged weapon you don’t really need the Toughness like you do on a primary melee weapon.

I can do thirty Five-Dolyak Arm Curls.

Do you even lift, bro?

9% Crit Damage vs. 130 Condition Damage

in Warrior

Posted by: Kazin.2073

Kazin.2073

While Longbow has burning your build lacks condition duration.

Crit is to crit damage as condition duration is to condition damage.

You need both sides to maximize effect and your currently lacking the condition duration to consider condition damage.

Its kind of the problem with ranged warriors. Rifle has bleeds and direct damage, bow has burns and direct damage, you kind of get half the benefit of each when using them.