Showing Posts For Adaxia.5406:
Dumbest reason to quit a game I’ve heard in a while and I went through both Rome II and Battlefield 4 releases.
It’s part of the living story, at the point in the plot where the villain seems to be winning, followed by the climax where the hero saves the day.
I am okay with what you just said… I am NOT okay with how they are doing it. This is horrible… You don’t just drop people into a war zone…. filled with poison gas. It should be an instance where you experience it as a story… from the beginning. This is like starting the story 30 minutes in at the climax and dying… THE END.
So what you’re saying is that you logged off in Lion’s Arch knowing that it would most likely be a warzone the next time you logged in, and are complaining because you died? I for one think this is the best living story update yet, as do most of the other players on my server.
http://s16.postimg.org/ysuto144j/deth_vs_mu_AND_vlk.jpg
I expected more from you. No actually I didn’t. Only proves you cannot fight us without numbers. GvGs are about the fights, not this.
Its pretty obvious its a 15v15, its not that hard to pause a video and count red names. 1/10 trolling, try harder.
The only good thing about our reduced population in DH is that Fun can do our daily guild ops in EB now since there isn’t a queue. I almost feel sorry for the EB pugs in HoD and FC >:)
Great defense at FC Bay, that was a hell of a lot of fun
Yep, the best part about that was Fun taking your T3 bay and garrison while you were distracted
Since its now impossible for DH to loose, I would like to thank all the commanders and players who made this upset possible. Everyone did some really great work these past few weeks, and hopefully tonight we will get a good reward for our efforts.
Hey, only 1 DH is brave enough to come to OS Arena. ET loves to duel, please come out to play.
Sorry, we are too busy wiping ET and SF at SM.
My point was and is, the “screw the small groups/roamers, basically anyone that doesn’t wanna ball up and play scoreboard/ppt” mentality is the reason why SF will not/does not get many transfers.
There are servers with Very High pops that even in bronze and silver get transfers. But on SF you have this mentality that gets published on these forums like: “our way or the highway”.
At the end of the day I only brought it up because you are more likely to get small guilds transfer down from higher tiers than you are to get 1 big oceanic guild. But when you say things like “we are getting rid of the solo people” it makes people think that all you do is zerg and to be on SF you have to zerg, etc.
Which is a bad way to entice people.
Well if we had somethign other than an 1800 gem cost for transfer, which is the same as the #1 rank, perhaps it would be different. 22$ per player to go play on a bronze tier server with a lack of coverage simply makes it a bad investment, especially when looking at the others with the same price. Its pointless to try and attract the solo player when we’re trying to build competent teams. I would rather fail then get a ton of people that just tell us to kitten off like the pugs do atm. When I want to play solo, I go here: http://www.lichess.org – you know, a game that is meant to be played solo…
Your statement is exactly SF’s problem.
Not everyone wants to join the zerg nor is the zerg only tactic a viable way to win as this season has proven to you.
WvW is won by zergs, smaller teams and solo roamers.
You need them all to win – not just one.
Solo roamers help the other team win.
Also, in Bronze, we don’t really have any zergs, 30-man groups are pretty much tops. Highest I saw was 42 and it was because 3 groups merged for an all out attack on a garrison. Usually we have groups running around unable to pop orange swords. At least small teams can take towers so they arent useless. Solo roamers only queue maps and it worse for everyone, except the other teams.
Solo roamers are vital to us on DH, they make sure all our siege is refreshed, help take and defend camps, walk yaks, take ruins, and scout. Its not all about the havoc squads and zergs, without our solo roamers doing those things we wouldn’t be having nearly as much success.
So lemme see, what this Darkhaven stepping their game up is about…. Hmmmm oh I see it, they’ve built more arrowcarts in their keeps, and more field ACs.
In all seriousness it isn’t a step up, its a sad spectacle, there is a reason I’d take another week of HoD over Darkhaven, you wanna know the difference? HoD actually, I dunno… fought, didn’t matter we were losing, they were winning, they fought us. Didn’t try any bullkitten field siege.
I miss having those fights with VLK or MU on any given night, and actually being fought with, not seeing twenty nameplates retreat into a tower.
And while the last thing I expected was those two guilds really even caring much about the match-up, their presence is interested in any regard.
I dunno I just loved how Darkhaven wanted to say they’ve stepped their game up, when I’ve had better fights with ET’s groups than Darkhaven, so step up or step down? And this is in all disregard for PPT, cause in Coverage Wars 2 its a fools game.
You can say we didn’t step our game up all you want, doesn’t make it true. You are having better fights with ET because you two are fielding a more balanced number of players, its hard to have a good fight when its just us running over you over and over with a 700 ppt.
Don’t forget the ACs…
I can guarantee that we are using the same amount of ACs as before, along with a sweet guild trebuchet that can hit all 3 inner gates at the valley keep. Stopped that SF assault dead in its tracks >:)
So lemme see, what this Darkhaven stepping their game up is about…. Hmmmm oh I see it, they’ve built more arrowcarts in their keeps, and more field ACs.
In all seriousness it isn’t a step up, its a sad spectacle, there is a reason I’d take another week of HoD over Darkhaven, you wanna know the difference? HoD actually, I dunno… fought, didn’t matter we were losing, they were winning, they fought us. Didn’t try any bullkitten field siege.
I miss having those fights with VLK or MU on any given night, and actually being fought with, not seeing twenty nameplates retreat into a tower.
And while the last thing I expected was those two guilds really even caring much about the match-up, their presence is interested in any regard.
I dunno I just loved how Darkhaven wanted to say they’ve stepped their game up, when I’ve had better fights with ET’s groups than Darkhaven, so step up or step down? And this is in all disregard for PPT, cause in Coverage Wars 2 its a fools game.
You can say we didn’t step our game up all you want, doesn’t make it true. You are having better fights with ET because you two are fielding a more balanced number of players, its hard to have a good fight when its just us running over you over and over with a 700 ppt.
Its funny how SF are so angry that they are just raging at everyone now. Atleast wait until HoD start stomping your face into the ground before you start trash talking to them, its DH’s turn to do that.
There is no use whining about coverage, we did that for quite some time on DH. After awhile you have to step up, recruit more PvE players, and fix the problem. Between now and the start of the season, we recruited many new PvE players to WvW, we trained new commanders, and we stepped our game up. SF is getting beat even during primetime when numbers are even, so you can say that coverage is why you are losing all you want but it isn’t true. You are losing because we stepped up and improved, and you didn’t.