Hello again,
When I said the guardian is in a good state, I meant that I did not agree with most of the proposed changes and I had already written why.
This is what Jonathan Sharp had to say about the profession as seen in the December 14 Update Notes: “The Guardian is a heavy armor class who relies on boons to make up for their low levels of innate health. They focus on area control and punishing enemies for the position on the battlefield. We want them to feel very powerful when their boons are active, but if those boons are removed, they will start to feel pressure. They can remove conditions more easily than the Warrior, but share the Warrior’s need to be in melee range to dole out maximum damage.”
Maybe I was not clear in my lengthy post, but since the guardian is a class that requires to be in melee range to be most effective and feel very powerful when their boons are active, it is natural for them to take 30 in valor to get more armor and also a trait that heals when applying boons. Guardian players are just playing to the profession’s strength.
People seem to have a problem with taking 30 in valor or honor because they see it more of a bunker/supportive trait line. Over time, some may get bored of this role especially after playing hundreds of hours and that is understandable, but inherently guardians were meant for this role to “feel very powerful” when applying boons and removing conditions from teammates. I for one am glad that guardians have a specialized role, unlike the warrior which can roam but are not as good as thieves and elementalists, and also can bunker but not as well as the guardian.
Making zeal and radiance grandmaster traits as viable as altruistic healing will put the class over the top. How can you change any of the grandmaster traits in those lines to compete with a trait that synergizes so well with the guardian’s strength—boons and condition removal? For thought: would placing any of AH, MF, PoV in those two lines satisfy people?
Are the minor and major traits in those lines viable? I believe so: they provide enough diversity for one to play a more offensive support role if one pleases. And the skill balancers also realize this: in the December 14 patch they made binding jeopardy and blind exposure more worthwhile to take.
As for the weapons, I find them to be “good.” However, this is semantics and some people may want more from a weapon. What you cannot argue though is the fact the staff is a great support weapon. Taking 2-H mastery, symbols are larger, and just eating a chocolate omnomberry cream will give you almost permanent swiftness to your entire WvW zerg and twelve stacks of might to your party. Line of warding is amazingly “good” and also fun for all sorts of WvW scenarios. The scepter “serves its purpose” as I have said—a viable ranged weapons that does decent DPS and that has an extremely hard to dodge 3 second immobilize/3 stacks of vulnerability (untraited). Again, what more exactly did people want?
Stating that anything in WvW with lots of “white hit” (a zerg) is skillbased is also rubbish. In those cases I run around like a chicken with my staff critting 1.2 k to everything around me just once or twice with auto attack and get twice as many loot bags compared to when I use any other weapon. Forget aegis, you want a different mechanic entirely in those cases (try wall of reflection, sanctuary, or ele’s swirling winds). Aegis is fine.
Just because you play tankish does not mean you are excluded from being offensive. You may not be critting like a thief or warrior (and I don’t think that was the intention of the designer) but you can make up for it by stacking your might boons or using blinds against key skills or using knockbacks, wards, immobilizes to control the playing field. You have traits in zeal and radiance that improve those immobilizes and blinds that give you diversity in play styles.
I see the guardian not as a jack-of-all-trades profession but one that is highly specialized with enough diversity to keep it still fun to play after these many hours. People may call me out for being “indifferent,” but I still stand by the belief that the profession is fine as it is besides some minor bugs.