Guild Wars 2

Stop thinking about report things. It won’t work, as Anet is looking for a system that would fix without the need of report.

BUT: having a link between the blue print and the one who dropped it would be usefull, if, for instance, blocking a player would make the blue print used by this player invisible. Most of trolls are getting blocked by “regular” players, mostly for their spam in /map, and when you attacking a gate and building something, it would solve the problem of “accidentaly” building a troll blue print.

Once built, the siege would become visible for all.

Allowing to dissipate/destroye unwanted siege would lead to a massive troll. Having a tag now is fairly easy, and you would find players destroying all siege on keep and tower.

I would add an idea to the “Exhaustion” system.

I’m sorry if already said, and for my poor english.

Currently the idea is good, but may be a problem if for instance a commander want to drop 7 guild catas to a wall (it can happen), or go for a 4-5 golems rush. As said by many, in general it’s the commander that drop siege, to prevent confusion and allow a better gestion of the supply.

What I would suggest is: after dropping 3 sieges, if the 3 sieges are manned and used then the “Exhaustion” buff is cleared. A troll is often alone, and therefore can’t drop more than 3 balista every 3 min, as the balista will remain unused, while the commanders will be able to drop as many siege as he want, the control would be that he has around him many players that will use the siege, and therefore agree with the usefulness of them (the fact it’s not a troll).

I hope you find this idea relevant, I do believe it would be a plus.

Hi,

Currently starting to make video out of GW2, and had a question:

Does Anet allow the monetization of video including screenshot and/or video of someone’s screen ?

I’ve seen both side out of google research about this point, and would like to make sure that it’s either allowed or not.

Thank you