Showing Posts For TaiLang.5162:
+1
I always played archer classes in MMOs, I think it’s fair to let the player decide if he wants a pet or not. A warrior chooses not to use his F skill and receives bonuses for it through traits, it sounds fair to me if rangers received a bonus for not using pet.
I’m unhappy with my ranger for one reason : I want to have a bow as a main weapon and a melee just for some cases. I wanted to play a bow profession, not some melee medium armor. If I wanted to melee, i’d go for warrior or guardian, that simple. It is obvious that by using a bow on ranger you are much more ineffective compared to using a sword or GS. That and only that is making me feel disappointed about this class. Btw i only play ranger, she is my main and only char.
i just dont want to use pets. they was bad in pve and useless in wvw. now they worth nothing. give us something like elementalists attuments! a pet mode with pet, the others without it, a sniper mode, a survivor and a buffer mode (example)
I would pay for tons of gems in order to get a sniper mode on my ranger, I hate having this thing pulling aggro and slowing me for a F2 utility…
I’ve been running a full zerker since the beginning and I feel great about it. In WvW I always follow a zerg and I can assure you, at 1500 range you can easily survive a large scale fight. I run LB S/W and together with lightning reflex i have a total of 3 leaps that can get me out of problem. LB #5 can cause lots of dmg and cripple if placed correct, dealing up to 1,6k per instance on crit. I understand that most rangers enjoy small scale fights or 1v1 in WvW, but i prefer large zerg clashes over anything else, and a zerker ranger is a good choice for that imo. Also, piercing arrows can be fun in fights on walls or gates where people are packed, mass knockback FTW !
Dual crossbows, would use.
And make it reload exactly like Arnold did with his shotgun in Terminator 2.