Showing Posts For savageschemer.1036:

New update - Network Error on Connection

in Account & Technical Support

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

Still happening.

Lion's Arch - Tomorrow!

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

It’s so BEAUTIFUL!

Nice job on the new LA, guys.

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

Initially I wanted to buy the ultimate pack for my son and I because I thought 4000 gems + 1 character slot is more than the cost of $50. But after reading all the complaints about $50 being overpriced for a basic pack, I am having second thoughts about the expansion.

You guys have changed my mind as I feel your pain. I am waiting to see how ArenaNet would respond.

In all seriousness if you were looking at a particular package ArenaNet is offering and you thought, “yeah, ok, a great gift” then I’d probably go ahead and buy it. I’m sure your son will love it regardless.

Just steer him clear of the forums.

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

The Entitlement Metagame

Calling players “entitled” is what all the cool kids are doing now, because it’s cool. Suggesting they stop is uncool, because it offends their sense of entitlement.

However, there is a silver lining to this dismal state of affairs. What is it, you ask?

The Entitlement Drinking Game!™

Every time you see the word “entitlement” in the GW2 official forums, take a drink.

Be sure to have plenty of your favorite beverages on hand, and if they happen to include alcohol, hide your car keys and make arrangements in advance for the liver transplant you’ll inevitably need after just a few short days.

Don’t worry, though. It’s what all the cool adults are doing.

LOL!
I’ve got two bottles of whiskey and 60 bottles of homebrew beer. You’re on!

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

I see the entire conversation as nothing more or less bargaining. Which there is nothing wrong with at all. In fact, it should be expected.

Yes. Exactly. What I was hoping by starting this thread is that more people could come to see it that way instead of bandying about a tired and completely misused meme that’s been floating around here.

Some people, sadly, will just never get it.

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

I see you are just picking what you liked out of my post. I have no problem deleting a character to roll a rev as I have one just holding the name I wanted to call my rev, as I didn’t like engineers. One of the selling points of HoT is the rev. So if you buy the base edition and have filled out your 5 slots you got with the base game, you have a pay wall that stops you enjoying 100% of what you payed for.

Sure, but the same is true of buying the base GW2, as there were eight classes but only five character slots. you couldn’t play them all without either buying additional slots or deleting characters.

If you want to make a Revenant without paying another dime, then buy the slot with gold or delete a character. If you want to play the Revenant without deleting a character, then buy an additional character slot. That is the deal, they don’t owe you anything better than that, all they owe is what they offered, that you have the OPTION of filling any empty character slots you may have with Revenants.

I’m not saying ANet must give everyone a “free” character slot with HoT, I believe it should have come with one.

You realize that’s the same thing, right? “I’m not saying they have to give me something for free, I’m just saying they should give it to me, and I shouldn’t have to pay for it.”

I think there’s a major disconnect on that last sentence. You are, in fact, not both saying the same thing. The word “free” is a key indicator here. There’s nothing free about it when we’re talking $50+. What he said would have more correctly, as some others in the community have said, been interpreted as something more like “the base value of the package without a slot probably should have been closer to $40 or $45. At $50 it should include a character slot figured into the price”. Again, value statement.

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

None of that matters anyway. Whatever we did in the game so far, we already paid for and whether we paid a lot, or only for the original game, we don’t need to take that into consideration when we look at how we value what’s offered in the expansion.

Agreed.

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

There’s no way for us to know who has or hasn’t spent money in the gem store beyond personal admission, but yeah, I suspect there may be a bit of that going on.

The "entitlement" meme needs to stop

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

People throwing around the word “entitlement” in the HoT pre-purchase discussion(s) really should learn what the word means. Entitlement in the ongoing community discussion would be, “I’m a veteran player, therefore I should get the expansion for free”. That’s not, as near as I’ve been able to tell, what one single person over hundreds of pages of threads has said. Instead the ENTIRE discussion has been, “if ArenaNet wants my money, then something needs to change”.

That “something” has been different for different people joining in the discussion, and is central to the debate. For some its that the price is too high no matter what. For others, they want ArenaNet to “sweeten the pot” a bit before they commit their hard-earned money to a purchase (which is how business negotiation and trade works). Others still feel the value being offered in the product punishes the very people who’ve provided ArenaNet with past revenue over those that have never provided them any revenue. Finally there are those who feel the product for its price is completely fair as-is. I assume most of the "entitlement’ meme repeaters fit into this last category. These are all examples of people making value statements.

To reiterate, the discussion this community has been having, then, is 100% based on the exchange of money for a product, making the entire discussion one of value by definition, not entitlement. So please, please stop using the “entitlement” meme if you’re one of the people who disagrees with the value statement being made by others in our community. It just makes you look ignorant.

YouTube journalists need to cover this

in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

Totalbiscuit would simply say that he’s been telling us all for years now to stop the pre-order nonsense. He’d be totally right.

Character Slot for Heart of Thorns? [Merged]

in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

Please show one example of where anyone said they’re entitled to anything. I don’t see any. Instead what I see is largely a community consensus (between this and the other threads) that the value being offered for the asking price doesn’t match up in the minds of the player base. It is completely reasonable to let arenanet know that their sales won’t match their own expectations if they don’t get on the same page, value-wise, as their current customer base.

No entitlement. Just a bunch of people with 50 bucks, or more, that they’d be willing to part with if Anet meets them on that very basic free-market principle.

And, by the way, Diablo 3: Reaper of Souls came with an additional slot (it actually came with 2 slots and an additional 3 for a total of 5 if you bought the digital deluxe edition). Way to get your facts straight. But thanks for stopping by.

*source: https://us.battle.net/shop/en/product/diablo-iii-reaper-of-souls#deluxe

(edited by savageschemer.1036)

Character Slot for Heart of Thorns? [Merged]

in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

@Woljnir – You miss the point entirely. We’re not lamenting having made the purchases we’ve made. We’re pointing out (hopefully to areananet, because where our future money goes is between us and them) that we’re loyal “repeat” customers who’ve spent more than the standard amount with Anet, and feel we we may be being under served with their marketing decision. We’re further making it clear that the potential future dollars in the form of xpack & gem store purchases can very well go elsewhere.

Personally, I’m asking for clarity on the matter.

(edited by savageschemer.1036)

Character Slot for Heart of Thorns? [Merged]

in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

I really think they need to clarify this quickly.

For myself, I’ve got 2 accounts, meaning I’ve purchased the base game twice. I’ve also occasionally dumped real money into the gem store when I didn’t feel like converting gold. In short, I think I’ve been the model Anet customer.

The extra character slot(s) with the base expansion (not some “deluxe” edition) is the NUMBER ONE thing I’m looking for and want to know about. I don’t even mind that the expansion is 50 dollars (most expansions cost the same as the base game anyhow an there’s no monthly charge, so cool).

I will NOT buy the expansion on the hope of getting extra slots. I need to know ahead of time. Furthermore, If the expansion doesn’t come with any extra slots, I’ll simply not buy it period. I will instead, with unwavering certainty, walk entirely away from the game and take my real money gem store purchases with me. You might say Anet is big enough that they don’t care, and maybe that’s true. I write this all the same in the hopes that someone with Anet with real decision making power sees this and takes it into consideration.

Thanks for the great gaming up to now.

[Video] Xun D/D Solo "life stealer" build

in Elementalist

Posted by: savageschemer.1036

savageschemer.1036

A question: The sigil of leeching says that you gain its benefit after switching to that weapon while in combat. Since eles don’t get weapon swapping, how does that work with this build?