Guild Wars 2

It would be fun if this was a sink and then they introduced a use afterwards.

Clearly the golem rush event is a way to get players to unload their relatively useless currency known as Badges of Honor.

hmmm… if guesting would allow WvW on another server that your home server isn’t currently matched against…. then why not? … what harm would that do?

Well, he only says that the SAB wont appear during the living world. And if I recall correctly, the living world is taking a break now…

That infinite coin down the toilet.

fishball.7204:

SAB W2 also released at the same time as Ascended weapons which meant that a lot of the PvE focus was on grind grind grind rush rush towards Ascended instead of SAB.

THIS THIS THIS.

Anet even stated many times that it was their mistake to release content AND features at the same time. That is the reason feature packs are now separate from content packs. I’m not even sure where people are getting the “info” that SAB#2 had low player participation. Even if it were true, you don’t know why.

nicknamenick.2437:

No, just spend there time to make new dungeons or pvp game modes pls

not a silly game, why even play GW2? you can play tons of that cheap game everywhere..

Plz show me where I can play SAB anywhere?

SAB to be permanently enabled!

2 source traces, one from Cox communications the other from Cogent. Both route through level3 to get to your servers.

Going from Phx, to Dallas, to LA/Wash to Paris, to Frankfurt, back to texas (where your servers are located)

Connections are being dropped and everyone that is sourcing from Level3 is going to have this issue until a ticket is opened with them.

I have a ticket with Cogent and Cox opened within their Link partner agreement. But you being the affected business should really be riding level3 to fix this.

Tracing route to 206-127-159-116.plaync.com [206.127.159.116]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out.
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.0.0.10
4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms vl1205.na31.b020427-1.phx02.atlas.cogentco.com [
38.72.64.33]
5 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms gi2-1.ccr01.phx06.atlas.cogentco.com [38.122.89.
125]
6 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms te0-3-0-3.ccr22.phx02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54
.88.253]
7 13 ms 13 ms 14 ms be2333.mpd22.lax01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.41
.249]
8 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms be2076.ccr21.lax04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.2.
165]
9 * * 13 ms level3.lax04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.14.130]

10 159 ms 158 ms 158 ms vlan80.csw3.losangeles1.level3.net [4.69.144.190
]
11 161 ms 158 ms 158 ms ae-83-83.ebr3.losangeles1.level3.net [4.69.137.4
1]
12 159 ms 158 ms 160 ms ae-12-12.ebr1.washington1.level3.net [4.69.132.8
2]
13 158 ms 158 ms 158 ms ae-71-71.csw2.washington1.level3.net [4.69.134.1
34]
14 159 ms 159 ms 159 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.washington1.level3.net [4.69.134.1
49]
15 158 ms 158 ms 159 ms ae-44-44.ebr2.paris1.level3.net [4.69.137.61]
16 158 ms 158 ms 159 ms ae-45-45.ebr1.frankfurt1.level3.net [4.69.143.13
3]
17 159 ms 158 ms 158 ms ae-91-91.csw4.frankfurt1.level3.net [4.69.140.14
]
18 159 ms 186 ms 158 ms ae-4-90.edge6.frankfurt1.level3.net [4.69.154.20
2]
19 159 ms 158 ms 158 ms 195.16.161.58
20 160 ms 160 ms 158 ms 206-127-157-86.plaync.com [206.127.157.86]
21 159 ms 160 ms 166 ms 206.127.157.102
22 * * * Request timed out.
23 * * * Request timed out.

Tracing route to 206-127-159-116.plaync.com [206.127.159.116]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.16.100.254
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 12 ms 24 ms 17 ms 172.21.1.38
4 12 ms 32 ms 14 ms 72.215.229.22
5 19 ms 13 ms 11 ms 72.215.229.63
6 69 ms 11 ms 20 ms ae57.bar2.Phoenix1.Level3.net [4.28.82.53]
7 20 ms 11 ms 17 ms ae-0-11.bar1.Phoenix1.Level3.net [4.69.148.113]

8 158 ms 152 ms 158 ms ae-8-8.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.133.30]
9 156 ms 166 ms 154 ms ae-71-71.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.151.137]

10 157 ms 158 ms 163 ms ae-73-73.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.151.146]

11 * * * Request timed out.
12 153 ms 155 ms 157 ms ae-2-2.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.132.86]

13 156 ms 160 ms 162 ms ae-71-71.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.134.1
34]
14 156 ms 159 ms 164 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.134.1
49]
15 156 ms 152 ms 170 ms ae-44-44.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.137.61]
16 154 ms 156 ms 152 ms ae-45-45.ebr1.Frankfurt1.Level3.net [4.69.143.13
3]
17 156 ms 159 ms 154 ms ae-91-91.csw4.Frankfurt1.Level3.net [4.69.140.14
]
18 155 ms 155 ms 161 ms ae-2-70.edge6.Frankfurt1.Level3.net [4.69.154.74
]
19 162 ms 156 ms 157 ms 195.16.161.58
20 182 ms 201 ms 154 ms 206-127-157-86.plaync.com [206.127.157.86]
21 156 ms 153 ms 162 ms 206-127-157-102.plaync.com [206.127.157.102]
22 * * * Request timed out.
23 * * * Request timed out.
24 * * * Request timed out.
25 * * * Request timed out.
26 * * * Request timed out.
27 * * * Request timed out.
28 * * * Request timed out.
29 * * * Request timed out.
30 * * * Request timed out.

i think its fine the way it is, and ppl should get hybrid gear for mai trin, today on mai trin i told party to get more tankier gears right away , and just one of the wars didnt have anything besides zerker, ofc the war got downed often, meanwhile the rest of us did pretty fine, try not going full zerker at mai trin:p, and healing smth that 1 hits ppl is impossible anyway

healing is fine the way it is

Healing Ele is pretty darn OP. Just watch the last match of the NA ToL with KPz vs Apex Prime, and you’ll see just how strong the passive support Cleric’s Ele can give: http://www.twitch.tv/guildwars2/b/525879111

I think what’s important to realize is that the flow of damage in GW2 is different from other MMOs. It’s not a trinity game. You’re not going to get very far just camping Water Attunement and spamming its spells of CD. If you’re looking to play an Action-MMO with a Trinity-Healer, you should play Tera or Wildstar (both good games, btw). The Healer Elementalist is more about giving small burst heals when people need them, providing a TON of Healing over time (Regen + Soothing Wave is no joke), and giving support through all their boons and combo fields (such as Protection from Earth Attunement or providing important powerful Water and Fire Fields for team play). In WvW, we see coordinated zergs timing Water Fields at the right time, so that their allies can blast finish in them for sustained healing. And the Elementalist’s weapon sets provide a great mixture of Soft and Hard CC that really mess up players or allow you to control mobs.

With that said, I feel that full on Cleric’s Elementalist is best suited to sPvP and WvW, where your heals probably scale better to the kind of damage you receive. PvE is straightforward enough that you can just deck out your character in full damage gear and kill everything really fast, and because everyone has their own heals and ways to mitigate damage, there’s no need for a dedicated Healer. It’s still pretty strong in my opinion, it’s just not needed, and it’s not the kind of support that people want in the way people complete PvE content (which is do it as fast as possible). PvP Healer Ele is still, in my opinion, very viable and useful.

Is it restricted to the whisper chat?

We already tried to discuss it here, but until now no dev acknowledgement:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/support/bugs/Can-not-ctrl-click-an-item-to-send-info/first#post2901231