Guild Wars 2

Jesus christ, just fix your kitten overflow coding. I’ve never seen such horrible coding before. You’re supposted to generate new instances once the other instances are FULL. Don’t create 10 new instances when a single instance is full. Seriously, who are these dumb coders?

The knights don’t scale what so ever. So it’s impossible to do the event unless you’re in a full overflow. And due to the coding it’s not possible to get a full overflow since your stupid coding generates like 10 new overflows per full instance.

FIX THE OVERFLOW CODING

Request!!!!

Diablo 2 theme

How can this not have been done already?!

thefreezingvoid.8516:

I assume you are talking about JQ getting 3 weeks of t2 match ups?
If so, would you shut up about the unfair schedule already?
Even with the easy match ups there is a good chance JQ will not get gold, depending on what happens in BG’s and SoR’s match ups.

Besides hardly anyone in JQ is happy about the t2 match ups either. Many of us are afraid what will happen when we have to face a t1 server gain. Will we be too rusty? Will too many AC hunters still be clogging up the queue’s not realizing that this isnt another easy match up?

Will people still be crying unfair?

Rusty? Amusing to hear that from a server winnig solely because of coverage and size. In the end of the day I’m sure we’re having more fun wiping your zerks literally three times our size all day when we do get on than you do flipping stuff in maps with none in ‘em. And to think you have to be in queue to do that. Whatever the winner gets, I can’t be worth that.

To be honest I find it more fun to constantly win while I play, than to win in numbers that hardly matter.

The entire point thing is hands down based entirely on coverage, you can win all you want but you can only play so much. This is also the reason why it’s hard to make good match ups.

I am also hoping to see better match-ups in the future.

I think the concept of the ability is great. But I agree it should be a bit more viable than it currently is..