Alternative to banning people
lol, only allow them to walk around their prision cell.
would be fun to mock them from the outside hahaa
Better yet, make stocks and lock them there. Then allow us to throw rotten vegetables at them.
hahaha
and right in the middle of lion’s arch! that would be hilarious xD
:D What a way to make an example of them! Do you think they should only be there when they are logged in, or should they get an avatar to show even when they’re not logged in? Cycle through all of them on the naughty list so most get seen.
Obviously their ban time would not be reduced if they were not logged in. Add in some boring stuff you need to click every now and then so they can’t just go AFK.
Obviously their ban time would not be reduced if they were not logged in. Add in some boring stuff you need to click every now and then so they can’t just go AFK.
lol
You can’t lock users into the game by punishing them more for not being logged in. If that were added on top of the ban, many would not come back.
The purpose of temporary bans is to discourage them from repeating the behaviour when they return, which means they are very welcome back when the punishment has ended. Causing them to log in to a game to do tedious work to reduce their punishment countdown does nothing to inspire them to participate in the punishment, and does nothing to strengthen and encourage the community spirit.
You can’t lock users into the game by punishing them more for not being logged in. If that were added on top of the ban, many would not come back.
The purpose of temporary bans is to discourage them from repeating the behaviour when they return, which means they are very welcome back when the punishment has ended. Causing them to log in to a game to do tedious work to reduce their punishment countdown does nothing to inspire them to participate in the punishment, and does nothing to strengthen and encourage the community spirit.
They should have thought about that before committing the bannable offense.
I believe nothing would strengthen and encourage community spirit more than throwing rotten vegetables at banned ppl together.
And then somehow the banned player was wrongfully banned, and didn’t deserve any of that, and now you can’t take back what he suffered from the wrongful ban.
In that case, he should then have the ability to make everyone who mocked him suffer the same.
Fair?
Your idea would only work if the bans were handled flawlessly – they aren’t.
I actually far prefer banning people to just in-game suspending them. While this would be hilarious to watch, it’d be salt in a wound. If you intend to ban someone for X amount of days, don’t make them suffer for it in front of everyone else.