Inspect player
I totally agree
/signed
Not needed and still suggested ten times over. Asking is only the polite thing to do, and we don’t want people excluding others from dungeon groups since they don’t have max-stat gear or prefer MF instead of being a glass cannon ect.
People who can argue often offer a good and meaningful conversation about the subject.
People who can’t tend to call the opponent troll, scream something utterly incomprehensible
and finally result to personal insults.
People who can’t tend to call the opponent troll, scream something utterly incomprehensible
and finally result to personal insults.
Only if it is purely aesthetic, no stats or names, just a close inspection on the look of the armour
Some thought provoking quote
Aesthetic only and no stats, then I’ll agree.
As soon as stats are shown…my god.
Here’s what people thought of GW1 when it first came out: http://tinyurl.com/bntcvyc
“A release is 7 days or less away or has just happened within the last 7 days…
These are the only two states you’ll find the world of Tyria.”
“A release is 7 days or less away or has just happened within the last 7 days…
These are the only two states you’ll find the world of Tyria.”
Xaxxus, XxNoahxX and Warcrazy, I strongly recommend you take a good look at the Diablo 3 and WoW forums, so you can have an idea, of the horrible functionality you are asking for.
Players do horrible things when given certain toys.
This is one of those cases.
Agree… maybe not the build, but gear should be ok.
Sorry for the spelling mistakes, is not my language. :P
The only way to make it ok is to hide all stats, upgrades and name of the item.
So for an exotic (orange name) Knight’s Darksteel Spaulders of the Flame Legion, you’d only see “Shoulders” written in white.
Salvaging Revamp || Combo Concepts || Expansion Concepts || Condition Stacking
Endurance 2.0 || Attributes, Traits and Conditions || Skill Variants
Endurance 2.0 || Attributes, Traits and Conditions || Skill Variants
(edited by Nurvus.2891)