Exclusive rewards are like medals.
I imagine we’ve been over this, but exclusive rewards are like medals in some ways, but distinctly and unignorably NOT like medals in others.
So long as these rewards have any value OTHER than as a token of accomplishment, such as either statistical OR cosmetic value, they cannot be treated merely as status symbols, and must also be considered as inherently valued, and desirable by those who have zero interest in the supposed “status” attached to them.
If you want to plead “they are used as a token of status,” then restrict it ONLY to items that have no value outside of this status-marking capability.
The world doesn’t work that way and neither should GW2.
There are very very very few items in this world that can be acquired ONLY through specific merit, and yet also have an inherent function as an object. Most “status rewards” come in the form of small discs or statuettes of metal, that have little to no value as an object when disassociated from the achievements they recognize. Off the top of my head I cannot think of any such awards that are worth much more than their weight in raw materials if not for the connection to whatever caused them to be given out. Pretty much any object of actual inherent purpose in this world, such as clothing, vehicles, media, etc., all you need to do is spend money on it, and you can acquire that money wherever you like.
Again because some actual visual swag is much more fun than just a title.
It is. It is fun for you to have it, no denying that, but it would be equally fun for some other player to have it, even if he has no interest in PvP, and your fun is not more important than his fun. The point is, you cannot claim that PvP armor should be exclusive to PvP because it is necessary to denote a difference between PvPers and non-PvPers. There are other methods of doing this that leave no collateral damage.
I want it to be the other way around. I want people to play the game-modes they like, become good at it and eventually have a nice exclusive reward to show off for it, something they can show their friends and say “look what I got, isn’t it shiny? I got it for beating this incredibly difficult raid”.
And they can do that, but if someone else really likes that skin just because they really like that skin, they should be able to get it too, even if they can’t do that raid.
We both know that’s BS. Yes I take pride int he accomplishment itself, but merely achieving an impressive accomplishment without being rewarded for it gets incredibly boring really fast.
That’s very sad, but I don’t see why it should be anyone else’s problem.
Lest be honest, who doesn’t like to receive a big golden medal and wear it proudly on his chest after proving that you’re the best at whatever it is you earned that golden medal for?
I’m not even touching this one.
The pride and value doesn’t come from the exclusivity, it comes from being the best at something and having something nice to show for it.
But that’s basically two ways of saying the same thing. It’s only exclusive because only the best can have it (in that case, at least). If everyone can get it, if it’s not exclusive, then you wouldn’t have to be the best to get it. So if you take pride in having a mark of being the best, then you are taking pride in that mark’s exclusivity.
And none of those are as fun as having an armor or weapon skin that I can wear on my character.
Maybe not, but likewise none of those are as sad as not being able to get the skin you want, so you have to lose a little of your fun to make a bunch of other people happier, and I’m ok with that. It’s not about you.
You might complain about people enjoying exclusive shinies that they can show off and gives them bragging rights, but your behavior is much worse. I rather deal with a bragger who actually earned his bragging rights than a spoiled jealous type who feels he’s entitled to all the shinies.
Yes, the typical mindset of the “haves” turn it all around that the “have nots” are the bad guys. I’m not impressed.
Ohoni, the false premise you have, is that armor is only about customizing your look. Some armors are more about what they represent than how a player wants his/her avatar to look.
And the false premise you have is that armor is not about customizing your look. If it were not, then why would it alter the way your character looks? If a player only wants a representation of accomplishment, as I’ve noted, there are numerous ways to do that which have nothing to do with character customization.
which isnt to say people shouldnt be able to get them, but rather they should be able to wear them, when they can represent what the armor is supposed to represent.
Which is often completely arbitrary to the look itself. My semi-main guardian is wearing a Glorious helm. Is that because I’m awesome at PvP? No, I’m fairly middling at PvP so far as I can tell, but it wasn’t hard to earn a few pieces of Glorious armor over the months, and the Glorious helm looked slightly cooler than the Council Guard helm he had been wearing, and fit his “winged avenger” style quite well. Did the Council Guard helm indicate that I was a dungeon fiend? No, I ran CM like 5-10 times total, just enough to get him that helm and boots for my Ele. Haven’t been back since. He has Luminous gloves and boots, does that mean I don’t own the rest? No, I do own the rest, I just don’t like the design of them as well as the other bits he has on. Do I care that someone could look me over and guess at what I have and have not done? Not in the least. I do take some pride in the overall aesthetic of the ensemble, but not in any of the tasks I did to unlock the pieces themselves.
Basically sometimes the game, and personal appearance as a factor of that, has to come before people showing off to people they falsely assume care what they’ve done.
you spend complaining about it on the forums, you’d be
done by now.”