so what your saying is sense you are so many skill lvls below everyone else you have the right to ask for nerfs and because you are so stubburn you dont need to L2P you just want it made easier for your skill lvl.??? sorry man i dont agree with you.
LOL, you are a joke. How am I below other ppl when I beat them in duels?
No one would be asking for nerfs if ANET did their balancing and communication job properly. If they introduce proper ranked ques and show ppl that each class has approximately fair statistical representation in top ranks there will be no need to discuss balance. Ppl will KNOW it is balanced (or that ANET knows it is not balanced but they are working on balancing it). What frustrates people is lack of objective measure of balance and fumbling in the dark that ANET is doing while calling it balancing.
Everyone knows game is not balanced now in any setting, be it 1v1 or 5v5. In 5v5 you simply have severe over-representation of mesmers and guardians. And you have severe under-representation of some other classes (yes, the fact that you have few players of each class means pretty much nothing balance wise). That is called ‘lack of balance’ whether you understand it or not.
also you said because i got killed but won the match that means the person that killed me is a perfect player and doesnt need to L2P??? sorry man i dont agree
I did not say he is a perfect player. I said you have no business telling him to L2P. Yes, everyone can always improve further but that is not what L2P means.
and because i made it to the top of the QP leaderbords and im excited i cant go and say ty to the ppl that helped me get there because its embarrassing??? sorry man i dont agree.
LOL, QP is meaningless crap, a grind metric. You play ton of games you get ton of QP. Some team beats you in 80% encounters but plays much less, they get less QP. That is called ‘meaningless grind metric’. The fact that you think it means something tells us that you have no clue.
You do not even understand that 99.9999% of players do not (or very rarely do) even play 5v5 nonsense (especially not paid tpvp). In that majority there are better players than you and your tpvp buddies. Sorry to burst your bubble.
They just do not participate in your 5v5 nonsense because they find it inconvenient and mostly boring. They do what is fun (convenient) to them.
were not all on the same skill lvl which im sure your aware of but that is no reason to nerf nerf nerf so until you find me this super op class then im sick and tired of hearing these nerf this and that post thats all im saying.
Nerfing and buffing is the same thing. To give you example:
Imagine you have 50% of mesmers in top rankings, and you have 7% of all other classes. Then all classes are actually balanced EXCEPT mesmer. Now, you could buff everyone else and leave mesmer as is, or you could nerf mesmer. It would be stupid to buff everyone else because you risk imbalancing 7 balanced classes (very likely) just to avoid nerfing one to bring it to balance. Also it is much more work to change 7 classes instead of 1. So, naturally, you will nerf mesmer untill mesmer has approximately the same representation as other 7 classes (i.e. they all have approximately about 12.5% representation in top rankings).
Until ANET puts in PROPER ranked ques (rankings that depend on skill, not grinding like QP does) for 1v1, 2v2, 3v3 and 5v5 we will not have objective measure of where we are balance wise.
In the meantime everyone is free to express his opinion. If you are tired of it, do not read. Who are you to tell ppl to stop expressing their subjective opinions, since you are not offering anything objective either. What you or your buddies think is irrelevant subjective thing, you are pretty much nobody like everyone else. Only statistical representation in top rankings is objective and will convince players that balance is there (and we know it is not currently).
We need ranked ques and good statistical sample at the top (about 500 players) and enough games played (1000 would be nice) to know. Until then we can just express our subjective opinions.