Yes, it does. In the context on the other side, considering the sentences behind the “i think” make sure he believes it isn’t just his opinion.
Lonewolf Kai.3682
As for the rest, once again, so you think no one has the right to their own opinion? What if in the build poster’s mind the build is good? It’s his/her opinion and that doesn’t make it right or wrong. It makes it opinion. Just like it’s opinion that you feel it’s a bad build. Who are you to judge if an opinion is right or wrong?
Good point, but once again completely missed. You might use it for the posts haviz made:
haviz.1340
In my very individual opinion my build works good for what i’m trying to achieve.
but not for a point when talking about “good” and “bad” in general. Good and bad in general are objective and have nothing to do with opinion. 10/30/0/5/25 is good in dealing damage, support and survivability. 0/15/30/20/5 is bad at dealing damage, support and mediocre in survivability. This is backed up by facts, not opinion.
Yes, it does. In the context on the other side, considering the sentences behind the “i think” make sure he believes it isn’t just his opinion.
Lonewolf Kai.3682
As for the rest, once again, so you think no one has the right to their own opinion? What if in the build poster’s mind the build is good? It’s his/her opinion and that doesn’t make it right or wrong. It makes it opinion. Just like it’s opinion that you feel it’s a bad build. Who are you to judge if an opinion is right or wrong?
Good point, but once again completely missed. You might use it for the posts haviz made:
haviz.1340
In my very individual opinion my build works good for what i’m trying to achieve.
but not for a point when talking about “good” and “bad” in general. Good and bad in general are objective and have nothing to do with opinion. 10/30/0/5/25 is good in dealing damage, support and survivability. 0/15/30/20/5 is bad at dealing damage, support and mediocre in survivability. This is backed up by facts, not opinion.
Well not sure what more to say to you. You comprehended that he’s stating fact in Valor and Honor, I comprehended that it’s his opinion. So that’s that. You see apples. I see oranges. I’m sure Silent will come along and tell you what he thinks.
Next, good and bad are subjective and often based on opinion by the beholder.
And I’ll repeat myself, facts are also made of factors that do not necessarily include math. In other words, math is not the only factor.
Yes, it does. In the context on the other side, considering the sentences behind the “i think” make sure he believes it isn’t just his opinion.
Lonewolf Kai.3682
As for the rest, once again, so you think no one has the right to their own opinion? What if in the build poster’s mind the build is good? It’s his/her opinion and that doesn’t make it right or wrong. It makes it opinion. Just like it’s opinion that you feel it’s a bad build. Who are you to judge if an opinion is right or wrong?
Good point, but once again completely missed. You might use it for the posts haviz made:
haviz.1340
In my very individual opinion my build works good for what i’m trying to achieve.
but not for a point when talking about “good” and “bad” in general. Good and bad in general are objective and have nothing to do with opinion. 10/30/0/5/25 is good in dealing damage, support and survivability. 0/15/30/20/5 is bad at dealing damage, support and mediocre in survivability. This is backed up by facts, not opinion.
Good and bad are subjective and often based on opinion by the beholder.
And I’ll repeat myself, facts are also made of factors that do not necessarily include math. In other words, math is not the only factor.
What aside of math and numbers is included in making a build objectively good or bad?
Just a quick check:
Is 1/3/3/7/0 a good build?
I’d say it isn’t.
Is 1/3/3/7/0 a good build for having fun, just in my own understanding without refering to anything else?
In my opinion, yes.
Yes, it does. In the context on the other side, considering the sentences behind the “i think” make sure he believes it isn’t just his opinion.
Lonewolf Kai.3682
As for the rest, once again, so you think no one has the right to their own opinion? What if in the build poster’s mind the build is good? It’s his/her opinion and that doesn’t make it right or wrong. It makes it opinion. Just like it’s opinion that you feel it’s a bad build. Who are you to judge if an opinion is right or wrong?
Good point, but once again completely missed. You might use it for the posts haviz made:
haviz.1340
In my very individual opinion my build works good for what i’m trying to achieve.
but not for a point when talking about “good” and “bad” in general. Good and bad in general are objective and have nothing to do with opinion. 10/30/0/5/25 is good in dealing damage, support and survivability. 0/15/30/20/5 is bad at dealing damage, support and mediocre in survivability. This is backed up by facts, not opinion.
Good and bad are subjective and often based on opinion by the beholder.
And I’ll repeat myself, facts are also made of factors that do not necessarily include math. In other words, math is not the only factor.
What aside of math and numbers is included in making a build objectively good or bad?
Just a quick check:
Is 1/3/3/7/0 a good build?
I’d say it isn’t.
Is 1/3/3/7/0 a good build for having fun, just in my own understanding without refering to anything else?
In my opinion, yes.
What about you?
Life is more than just math and numbers mate. You HAVE to add in the human factor, which is probably the biggest game changer there is.
Edit: The forum didn’t edit the post. I was talking about being good or bad in general which includes survivability, damage and support. Not in someone’s very own opinion for some specific goal under whatever circumstances he has set.
[/quote]
Life is more than just math and numbers mate. You HAVE to add in the human factor, which is probably the biggest game changer there is.
Not everyone plays the same way you do.[/quote]
Not sure why but this sounds like one of those “believe in yourself you can overcome anything” or “the heart of the cards” sort of mantra’s. You could fly in an airplane, or you could fly with bird feathers glued to your arms. Although it will probably be more nonsensical and not at all good idea to do it with the bird feathers.
Compared to available recources. To what else, pandas flying in the space?
I’m not asking very thought provoking questions here. You clearly have a criteria you use to determine the boundary between what a ‘good’ and a ‘bad’ build is. If those criteria are robust, you shouldn’t have much difficulty answering my question.
For instance … is 1/7/3/3/1 a bad build? Not compared to a 0/0/0/0/0 build …
Let me ask an even simpler question and it should be a real easy one for you … what ARE your criteria for what makes a build bad or good?
I answered your question, saying “compated to available recources”.
Obtena.7952
Let me ask an even simpler question and it should be a real easy one for you … what ARE your criteria for what makes a build bad or good?
Excelling at either survivability, support or damage or taking a compromise in order to achieve better results overall.
As an example 0/0/30/30/10 is a good build under the specification of self-sustain only.
10/25/0/0/10/25 is a good build.
Bad builds are the opposite, neither excelling at anything nor being a trade of.
0/15/30/20/5 is worse than 10/30/0/5/25 in all means. Once the optimum (or something significantly better) is known, anything else becomes bad.
I answered your question, saying “compated to available recources”.
Obtena.7952
Let me ask an even simpler question and it should be a real easy one for you … what ARE your criteria for what makes a build bad or good?
Excelling at either survivability, support or damage or taking a compromise in order to achieve better results overall.
As an example 0/0/30/30/10 is a good build under the specification of self-sustain only.
10/25/0/0/10/25 is a good build.
Bad builds are the opposite, neither excelling at anything nor being a trade of.
0/15/30/20/5 is worse than 10/30/0/5/25 in all means. Once the optimum (or something significantly better) is known, anything else becomes bad.
Thats a very post wow way to look at it. I guess that works for pve though. My trait spread in wvw for my GS/Hammer build is 0/15/30/20/5 (different trait selections than what is in this guide though) and it works extremely well for me.
Great. Would you say it’s a stretch of the imagination to assume your criteria and your rankings associated with them are based on things you value in game?
Edit: The forum didn’t edit the post. I was talking about being good or bad in general which includes survivability, damage and support. Not in someone’s very own opinion for some specific goal under whatever circumstances he has set.
I think you’re missing some very key major and minor traits so you’re not as effective as you could be. This could potentially serve as a leveling build, but I think for leveling you should focus on one trait line and get it to 10 before you start on another.
You should change it to 10/25/0/25/10. Master of consecrations is incredibly useful. More so than pure of voice. Provides a variety of really good support, including reducing cd of purging flames.
