Listen I don’t really care about whatever reason, what lore, why they look like that has anything to do with extra options. In my view it’s just game and any free addition I get for my character whether it’s armor or character creation looks is a birthday gift to me.
Going into silly arguments about furrie sexual this and that means it’s a personal problem that does not agree to their view. Just because you dislike it doesn’t mean others don’t. Don’t even categorize them either just because it appeals to them. You suppose to play what appeals to you overall that’s just nature.
We know the female charr body is a different version of a furrie, but regardless it’s a furrie and its model not changing so I don’t know why all this fear is coming up about feminine armor changing. You’ll always have choices to wear that armor so it’s not a mandatory thing.
Glad I am not a furrie fanatic. Too much of a headache over silly stuff for silly reasons.
Meh don’t bother with the creative ideas about more feminine armor etc on the charr forums. You’ll get nothing, but criticism, insults and my view is right.
You know what dude I think I understand that insight of yours. I’m not much of a charr fanatic to care if charr females happens to receive some feminine armor, but when some people start saying force to wear and some other nonsense that doesn’t agree to their view. Giving it all negative vibes like it’s a taboo.
I think that’s just messed up overall. Coming to the charr forum your ideas are limited depending on the topic.
I know everyone has different tastes, but I can see why furries are frowned upon.
I just took the assumption that not many are not exposed to the art world or don’t know how to accept / respect the artist works for it’s creativity regardless if it’s bad taste or great.
Bottom line this Fembot model isn’t a problem at all because what makes this model than any we’ve seen throughout television such as sci fi, video games or even Anime / Cartoons.
None of the above because I know majority of us been exposed to that image. So this shouldn’t be an issue at all. If anything it should be normal for us and besides females does have a appealing body and I know so. So whats wrong with showing female representation on robots?
They should of buff it for both areas so we can have another dps weapon to play with. That would of been very nice so I hope it happens one day. I wouldn’t mind trying something new like wielding a 2hand axe
(hint hint)
If this is because of the new back piece holographic dragon wing skin then yeah I wouldn’t mind the extra dye option for back item. It would be cool to dye the wings to match my theme.
And yet it is you and ’collo throwing around incorrect numbers and claims. The usual offenders as always.
You’re not doing anything different either besides trolling and being vindictive. You want the profession to get better or not? That’s what they’re doing giving out comparisons and suggestions.
and you’re still undecided? People already gave their opinions and you can search on the internet for more sources about this topic. I’m not trying to be rude to you or anything, but I am just confuse why make another thread about it when you already made one 3 days ago while receiving decent feedback. It wasn’t good enough?
It was helpful for me though and I went with charr except it’s a guardian.
They didn’t nerf it, the tooltip was wrong. The GW2 wiki had a note about the real healing for a long time.
Even so it was still a slap in the face to a lot of players that was looking forward for it to be buff and have some improvements than it is now.
I can say from my perspective that when Jon Peters spoke on here once just to the excite the crowd which isn’t new to bring good news to something good happening for a profession that needs to be worked on. He said the passive healing on healing signet may need to come up on non healing builds, but that should be in both fields instead of one. He also speaks of Dolyak Signet that could use some changes as well. Now what I am getting is that a lot of warriors players were expecting it to come May 14th patch, but It didn’t. That’s why there is still a uproar going on in this thread and a few others.
As for the people who keeps comparing oranges and apples / those who keep coming up with silly theories which is a lot. I know none aren’t experience with warriors well besides being the glass cannon / P V T build and nothing more. I know none aren’t bunker build and if you want to say shout healing is bunkering then this profession is really out of balance. Bunkering is really is about doing low sustain damage, but with good regen healing / burst healing depending on the healing power. However Healing power doesn’t function well on warriors from what I’ve seen. They do not have much counters against other professions that have good burst / condition damage. On a warrior no matter how many times they remove the condition. They have to wait on the cool down to come again instead having it passive. Having high defense / health pool doesn’t help much either if the class doesn’t have any good survivability methods besides running away like a thief, but in heavy armor.
Anyways if you still have faith in this profession then keep on fighting, but for those who say this profession is fine where it’s at. Check the statistics on how many are representing it in Spvp overall and not WvW.
This thread was funny and cool until it drifted off into boring topics like crappy lore etc. Oh well the thread derailers are here once again. If they want different armor sets for the female asuras and charrs. Then give it to them to put smiles on their faces. I like creativity.
It would be too powerful. I can safely tell you i would destroy anyone if it was 450 per tick. I love this signet and will continue to use it. But 450 would be god mode because if someones bursting i would use defense cds and stall the fight a few seconds and have too much regen. 300 would make my day though
Even if it was ticking for 450 which would be good for warriors because knowing their survivability next to a thief w/o stealth support. They’re good as gone regardless of their so call bunker build / condition removal build lol. I know how this game runs for this profession.
Well that makes perfect sense. A skill that provides no burst healing should heal less in the long run and MUST be weak. Take that healing signet.
It wasn’t even good in the first place plus it barely gave warriors some survivability and that makes perfect sense to you??. You are so silly for that truly you are.
This is there game after all and I don’t even care now. I already know how their style is so I shouldn’t be surprise on this approach.
Besides how many warriors do you see using this in pvp anyway? Not many I bet.
I know I don’t use it and haha reading from your post not many will be using it at all. Sorry for your disappointment though, but you should be use to this style I mean warcraft was the same way.
They were good? You haven’t seen nothing yet. Can’t say much about the warrior cause if that was bunkering then that’s how far it will go when tanking those specific builds of rangers.
I understand ya absolutely because I’m in the same boat as you with a busy schedule life. It’s just I accepted the fact I couldn’t participate much regardless of forced dungeon or their event lines they setup for their customers. They did a great job on this event too in my opinion when I watch some users videos on youtube during break time.
As for the next event I know I won’t be able to participate much in Guild Wars 2 due to work. Can’t help it that’s life.
I nominate Braham for Teen Angst of the Year award. That said, I do enjoy the ‘Oh we’re so dead’ every time. The rest of it usually gets turned off so I don’t have to slap him.
I’m not sure why you’re adding pve into this when they’re truly focus on Spvp.
Lol I said one word that’d qualify it as PvE: pie. The rest stands on its own and you can simply disregard that single example. I also mention active defense (because that’s how you make more HP work harder for you) which is a whole other matter outside of Healing Signet.
I always try and make posts, pushing for better CC, better blocking or evades but it’s usually never discussed. But no, Warrior doesn’t need 800 HPS from the signet…that isn’t going to make them tanky because you’ll still get bursted down regardless.
It’s just the mindset you have you speak sounds like experience in the pve field about warriors or WvW, but when it comes to bunker warriors in pvp you know little. If the warriors regen was like that it can probably give condition players a run, but for glass cannons might have a tough time depends how evasive and shield blocking good the warrior is. They won’t get burst down quick without support of heavy condition builds which are bunker builds weakness unless they can cleanse it off.
Healing Signet doesn’t work for any builds, it heals almost as much as a boon, its a HEALING skill, it should heal for a lot more.
The way such skills are balanced, it’s how they potentially stack with similar effects. If it were a regen effect that didn’t stack with the Regeneration boon (choosing whichever provided the higher heal) then yeah, the skill would likely heal for a good deal more.
But thankfully it can stack with other passive healing which is likely how it was meant to be built for: use the skill if you have good access to regen, stack adrenal health and one extra passive-ish heal (like sigil of blood, dolyak rune, pie) to muster around 400 HPS.
This is all passive healing though. You don’t just use passive healing and expect to be a-okay. Use some active healing (usually healing shouts) or active defense and you’ve got your tanky warrior…still, signet active could be better for the folks not aiming at that specific build (as well as improving the scaling so it’s worthwhile to build for tankiness).
I’m not sure why you’re adding pve into this when they’re truly focus on Spvp. I didn’t mind your post until you mention you’ve got your tanky warrior if that’s how you vision them.
It doesn’t work like that how you’re describing it. What makes a good tanky warrior as Brutal says is regen. When shouts are on cool down healing signet passive won’t be enough for a bunker warrior. If warriors had burst heals like guardians and elementalists then shout healing is the way for warriors. Bunker warriors = regen with the combine power Healing Signet Passive, Adrenal Health and Banner regeneration. Yes they could use a buff like a buff in their regen to scale better with healing power.
My suggestion is for a bunker warrior is that they need more vigor boon support, protection, and passive condition removal traits. Now will this make them highly unstoppable? Not at all.
Of course we can counter conditions if the warriors is geared towards that, but that only limits their potential on the battlefield. It may look good in a 1 vs 1 fight depending on the profession, but having more enemies less likely condition removal will save the profession.
I’d get the conclusion people expected conditions not to be capable of accomplishing anything, much less conditions from a crowd of opposing players…funny that.
It’s not about overestimating it’s performance, but noticing the warrior player is limiting themselves against other encounters. Conditions are reapplied very quickly and stacks up depending on your opponent profession.
So am I the only warrior who thinks Adrenal Healing is situational?
For those experience with Adrenal Health we aware that it’s very situational. The other posters who keep posting with false theories do not know what they are talking about like Deniara Devious post claiming Healing Signet passive heal is the best heal in game, but on what field? Pve?
2Make it scale better with healing power. Ok, now I am “forced” into a gear set I don’t like, what if I want to bunker or something else? What if I want to run berserkers? What if I want to run Sentinels or Soldier gear? No, I am immediately forced to wear healing power gear. Also, why don’t the other two classes with healing signets need to be forced to take healing gear to make there heal good?!
Verdict: To restricting, none of the other signets have this kind of restriction, and scale better with healing already the fact they proc more.
Like the Developer said himself, the Passive needs to be boosted dramatically like the necromancers minion was, 80% Twice probably.
Perfect example not many players such as Daecollo won’t play a bunker/ healing because it will bore them. So if they buff Healing Signet regen to give warriors more survivability on the battlefield then that’s great which is also great for bunkers. Of course we can counter conditions if the warriors is geared towards that, but that only limits their potential on the battlefield. It may look good in a 1 vs 1 fight depending on the profession, but having more enemies less likely condition removal will save the profession.
I think the passive might need to come up in non-healing builds. If I run a clerics tactics build this signet can hold its weight, but it currently has NO place in a berserker build. Not sure it should be as viable in a seeker build, but it needs to see some play in soldiers, and certainly Valk and Shaman builds. Really signets are still going to have a hard time without a stun breaker (particularly in PvP and WvW). Obviously Dolyak signet is the most likely candidate here. Our next balance patch will absolutely be looking at stun breakers and spreading them out on all professions to make more categories of utilities viable. I’ll probably post this in general later as well but this was a larger balance pass and we will likely let this meta sit a bit longer than previous ones while we work towards taking time to push more less effective builds towards viable status.
Jon
That’s good thanks. I tried cleric build and Shaman build for a bunker a warrior using healing signet. It is a very situational regen combine with banner regen and it just does not keep me up as other bunkers that can manage to take on 2 or 3 enemies at a time. So I just went back to glass cannon with some toughness stats because healing power regen was not doing it for me or bunkering a node as a bunker suppose to.
so you just like being proven wrong on the forums multiple times a day?
They aren’t exposed to warriors much besides probably the usual glass cannon builds. If they tried to do bunkering in Tpvp rounds and maybe Spvp then they’ll see how wrong they are with this Super Bunker forgetting the fact this is a warrior. Just like a thief, but worst they can only do, but so much in combat and are first to be focus down quite easy.
QQ i have the most hp and armor in the game and now i want passive heals of a guardian.
Look it up its on par(and better) with every other passive out there-
Ele soothing mist-80hp/s
Guard virtue of resolve 84hp/s
Regeneration 130hp/s
OH noes i have the hp regen of an ele with perma regeneration,the warrior must be the weakest PvE class ever.
Soothing Mist – minor trait, also heals allies
Virtue of Resolve – virtue (duh), also heals allies.
Regeneration – comes from all manner of things, frequently also applied to allies.
Healing Signet – heal-slot skill. Does not apply to allies. Can activate for a really awful heal, be traited to activate for a really awful heal slightly more often, and grant 40 whole precisions (if traited), unless it’s been activated for a really awful heal lately.
Where were you going with this?
He wouldn’t know where he was going with that because he isn’t exposed to any other warrior builds. So he just post about what he thinks he knows warriors are blindfolded. On his part not very good at all and most likely does not want warriors to receive any buff that can make them competitive I guess.
What zone said. Why would you think a 4k heal would ever be on a 10s character specific CD. That would be ridiculously OP
Doesn’t have to be AOE for gosh sakes – can be limited to the holder and the creator – how about thinking outside the darned box for once here.
The way I see this idea is that the teammates gets half of the heal. If the warrior gets 4k heal then the allies get 2k…something like that. I do not like using banners personally because players in pvp may pick it up when you are defending a node. This what makes a bunker warrior crappy in my view because without the banner regeneration is just a lesser underpowered warrior.
Well I understand the OP point because bunker warriors are really crappy to play overall. Their condition system is about as crappy as a thief since they have nothing passively to remove it off let alone cool down utilities. I rather have a guardian or elementalist to take healing regen job than a warrior because lets face it. Warriors profession is not compatible in the pvp field especially as a bunker and their burst heals are horrifically disgusting . It’s actually funny to see one in action and sure they can probably beat a few professions such like wars and thief only, but that’s their potential.
How often do you see a bunker healing warrior participate in pvp anyway or in pve? Not many at all cause it is mundane to play one lols.
“Neither tears from me either and I play an Elementalist”
“I do not play my elementalist”
The person says they don’t play it often so why are you going to troll about it more? That’s silly unless you’re…..nevermind carry on lols.
I don’t see what is so confusing.
He says he’s not upset about the ele changes and he plays an ele. Then he repeatedly says he doesn’t play an ele because it’s boring.
Well, of course you’re not going to be upset about huge nerfs to a class that you don’t play because you don’t like it.
I figured as much you probably was offended by the person post whatever gender the person is. So you took the bite and trolled about it to make the person bite back yet they gave their reason. Ever come to the though that they might not be whining now about it, but when they play the profession more they will?
I think only part that made it confusing or disappointing is that you took the bait instead of shrugging it off.
From what I’ve heard only the horns are in the game and not the hair / eyes.
Some people want what Rox has like all of it options. The cutesy look with awesome horns drew their attention I guess.
Just sad, that they violate their own professed design philosophy of female charr by cute-ing Rox up to a parody-level and even giving her huge eyelashes.
That’s what happens when charrs get humans influence since they work together now……well most
Sheesh. People will complain about ANYTHING these days. Just be happy we’re getting FREE CONTENT and stop freaking out about one NPC’s face. She’s going to be gone after this Molten Alliance business is dealt with anyways, so you only have to deal with it for another month.
That is what I am saying hahaha. I appreciate we are getting something instead of nothing whether the model is cute or not. It beats a blank that’s for sure.
Genuine question .. are Rox’ eyes going to look like that? Right now, she looks like a comic-stylised character. I’ll have a hard time taking her serious, and importantly; immerse myself in the lore you’re writing into the game.
Thanks.
She looks cool, I like the horns and is that a new hairstyle? I like it. Why will you have a hard time about this? Lore? She’s just a NPC model of a teenager gladium charr on a mission. I am guessing her attitude may be spunky too. If anything this is her lore so she is a adventurous female charr sent on a important task. You guys need to ease down a bit and not overlook this issue too much. It baffles me to be honest lols
ArenaNet have already said they are going to stay with the capture base mode and use it as their ground to everything. So we will not see any gamemodes for a long time.
Do you have a link for this? I just wrote a long post complaining about the same thing, but if there is some official statement saying that they won’t implement new game modes in the near future, I guess that makes my decisions about this game easy. WvW has some appeal, but I came here for the PvP and I’m disappointed.
Btw, I’m quite willing to pay a monthly fee for a good game and I buy gems rather than farm for gold. I can imagine ArenaNet would place lesser value on the opinions of people who switched to this game just because WoW charges. I won’t go back to WoW, but someone is going to get my money.
You buy gems with money..that’s pretty much your monthly fee there. Plus the idea won’t work since they don’t do monthly fee and it’s on their advertisement. Why else would people buy this?
When they want to take a break from the game. They can always come back without worrying for the fact they don’t have to pay a “monthly fee” for it.
. Why will you have a hard time about this? Lore? She’s just a NPC model of a teenager gladium charr on a mission. I am guessing her attitude may be spunky too. If anything this is her lore so she is a adventurous female charr sent on a important task. You guys need to ease down a bit and not overlook this issue too much. It baffles me to be honest lols