Guild Wars 2

Been on Yak’s Bend since day one. Great community and would love for EU’s, Asia and Oceanic players to come help out and also see what we’re about.

If you want to know more about the Yak’s Bend community then I’m sure many of the players of Yak’s Bend would not mind at all just having a chat with you about it!

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

I very much appreciate the understandings from you guys, I can only hope that others feel the same as you do.

Its one thing to be proud of what you have accomplished but to boast about it is arrogant and disrespectful. The member of our guild, Dan, does not only affect himself but stuff like this affects Ragnarok guild and even Yak’s Bend as a whole. I cant speak for Yak’s bend as a whole but I can say that this is not what Ragnarok is about.

Apology –
 
On behalf of Ragnarok, I would like to apologize to the Yak’s Bend server for the incompetence of a member who recently decided to start this drama/arrogant postings. This is not what Ragnarok is about, we are about having a fun community who are also respectable of others. We are currently addressing the situation.
 
On another note of apology, I would also like to apologize to GoM and SF for this as well. We all know what it’s like to be on the side you are currently on. We went through the same hardships as well and still are to an extent. All I can hope for is that you guys rebuild the competitive community back up and hope this bears no hard feelings towards Ragnarok guild of Yak’s Bend.
 
I also hope Yak’s Bend will not hold any hard feelings toward Ragnarok guild as well. Again, I apologize and wish you all happy gaming.
 
Thanks,
Sivious of Ragnarok.

Oh and by the way, your comment in map chat “no wonder green is winnning, they have 40 people botting”. That has nothing what so ever to do with us winning, use common sense… they’re under water killing kraits. If that’s really your excuse then you have it all wrong.

I am from Yak’s Bend and I for one pray and hope that these bots get banned. It amazes me that people would do that in WvW of all things, it’s one thing to do it in PvE (which by the way I still do not support it) but even worse to do it in an instance that has a player limit causing others to have a qeue. I pm’d someone the other night from GoM to kill some of the bots from our server under water, I also reported the bots.

It doesn’t matter what server it is, YB, GoM, SF, JQ or anything… they deserved to get banned and constantly checked up on to make sure there are no more. It’s sad that when we do not even have an outmanned buff yet obviously out numbered in a lot of fights due to these kitten gold farmers. I beg A.net to do something about this.

I’ve always felt like a 2 minute time frame to get back in after dc is reasonable. Having a grace period would be such a huge improvement.

So what youre saying is… Instead of “teaming” against you, we should have teamed against the “strongest” one such as BG, so to speak?
As for your theory.. Trust me a lot of people pretty much stopped WvW mid week because after steam rolling towers and keeps with no challenges it got boring. So that theory is dead wrong, we want fun not boredom…

The funny part is that you guys actually believe Yaks Bend teamed up with anyone LOL.

@Orikx.9671
Youre absolutely correct. I was confused and you cleared it up for me. Thanks!
With that being said, as i said earlier ill happily admit when im wrong, so to blink, i apologize due to thinking you were talking about what Orikx has mentioned. I had no idea people were building into the citadel, i have apparently misread and misunderstood.

blink.4239:

Then the game would just be really boring. The better team wouldn’t bother going beyond the hills or bay if garrison were practically unholdable. Why not just make garrison an uncapturable point if they’re going to make it nearly impossible to hold?

The more and more you post, the more it seems you’re more so just too lazy to organize or care. So instead you want it pretty much handed to you without any work having to be done.

blink.4239:

I’ve already destroyed this point. The fact is that the non-home team would have to invest more resources to defend a treb outside of a fort/keep. It doesn’t take much for a medium-sized group to suicide-rush siege that isn’t protected by a wall. Every time the home team decides to make cliff treb, the non-home team attempting to defend the garrison will have to make a practically undefendable treb to match them. That is patently stupid.

K.. let’s play the quote game. First and foremost, if your group is smart, they would spend their supplies on that treb instead of constantly wasting it on repairing walls/gates that those “unreachable trebs” with infinite shots are shooting at. Secondly, the non-home team has no reason to defend the garrison.. it shouldn’t have been theirs from the beginning if you’re trying to defend the western keep (in which case you obviously are defending it since you’re complaining about a “unreachable treb” on top of the garrison.) Third, you’re wrong.. it’s not practically undefended, it’s just simply in the open making it more vulnerable than normal but by no means undefended. Not only that but as I said, if you can’t do this then your side simply lacks organization to quickly build a treb and fire 3 shots (about all it takes to destroy an opposing treb with your own). So much for your “destroying this point”.

Are you dense? This is only a problem if you have the garrison. Having the garrison doesn’t resolve this. Those unreachable trebs are able to hit the garrison outer wall. That was basically the whole point of this thread. The northern keep (garrison) is much harder for non-home teams to defend because the home team can treb the outer walls with unreachable trebs.

Insulting others now are we? I’m not sure if you’re at all anymore serious or just simply trolling now.. If YOU have the garrison then it’s not a problem at all anymore. If you have the western keep then yea sure, it’s troublesome but as I’ve stated, not impossible to get rid of. I’m simply replying to you to tell you how it’s done. You can always keep wasting supply to repair wall/gate but it would take a lot less to try out the strategy I posted (in which case it actually works a lot better as known from experience).

I think it’s more likely a design flaw

Whatever the case may be, if they say it is then by all means call me wrong. Don’t insult me because I’ll happily admit where I’m wrong however before insulting someone please try to consider others opinions first. If you do not wish to, then fine. Just a simple request.

You guys do realize there is a spot to put a treb to take down that treb right? Simple really.. it’s between the west tower and the garrison. Sure you would have to defend your treb but obviously you won’t have much of a problem if they’re not able to attack your keep head on. It’s in enough range to hit those trebs easily. It can and has been done.

Oh.. another way to stop this from happening? take the garrison. If you can’t do this then you simply lack the organization or numbers. I understand a garrison is quite difficult to take but it IS possible.
If Anet considers this an exploit then by all means say I’m wrong however I have my doubts that it’s an exploit.

Great guild! Great members. Looking forward to meet those who wish to join up with us