I politely request that Anet make a new Ranger CDI thread. To start the thread, Anet should summarize the previous thread (yes, all 67 pages please), including the ideas that are feasible, liked, and possible. This would help guide discussion into fruitful territory. Next, I would ask that Anet allocate an appropriate amount of staff to respond and collaborate with posters. Looking at the size of the previous thread, likely 3 staff members would be needed. This would go a great deal in making that 67 post thread not feel like a waste of time.
Really? You think that CDI fiasco was entirely Anet’s fault?
…Let me ask you all something: Who decided that Allie’s statement that permastow/aspects would not happen (at least not immediately) and continued to push for it? Who devolved the thread into a meaningless discussion about pets vs. permastow?
I’m not white-knighting Anet here—there’s definitely things that are broken with GW2, and that thread could’ve used more support, but honestly, so many people on this forum are so passionate about their race/class/build/etc. that it turns into anger. The reason that thread derailed was partially due to a lack of support, yes; but we certainly didn’t help put it back on track.
I saw a few people calling for others to use the format and offer other ideas. Most refused. They said, “We can’t talk about something else because it revolves around the pet!” Fair enough. But who was forcing the argument about pets vs. permastow? Why did that entire kittenstorm of borderline flaming and lack of productivity even have to happen? If there’s nothing to talk about, then we should’ve calmed down and bumped the thread until someone answered.
You know why that thread received little to no collaboration? Because they didn’t expect to have an average of 3-5 pages added per day. They didn’t expect one person to have to wade through properly formatted ideas as well as a useless argument to find gems. Poor Allie had to wade through all 67 pages of that. Sure, the ranger is a class that needs a lot of work, and maybe they should’ve anticipated the sheer volume of posts, but on the other hand we should’ve realized that Allie or anyone would have a tough time dealing with all our posts and tried to keep new posts as new ideas only
TL;DR: Yeah, Anet does some things sometimes that hinder the game, or that we don’t like. But that CDI thread didn’t need an argument about a topic that Allie already gave Anet’s opinion on. We complain that we never got a clear answer, but the reality is, we didn’t get the single clear answer THAT WE WANTED. We’re blaming Anet for the entirety of that CDI when it was OUR fault that we chose to focus on a useless argument instead of trying to keep things civil and simply give Allie time to respond. Sure, maybe other CDI’s got more attention; but it’s also partially on us to make sure we follow the rules of the thread and keep it from getting out of control.
Sorry if this sounds rude or accusatory, but what kittened me off the most about the CDI wasn’t the sparse responses, it was the people who refused to let aspects and permastow die after she said it was off the table.