Showing Posts For Meriem.3504:

Love spending hours...

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The fact you can even berserk them is a dumb whether its one class or all classes.

Queen's Gauntlet Farmers and (not) Reviving

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Games are good for showing the true character of a human being. A lot you will see aren’t very good at all. They have little to fear for their actions in a game.

I rarely complain, but...

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

It just RNG :/ sadly. They should of just had specific spawning spots.

The Gauntlet is.....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

…dumb!

This made me laugh cause I was about to post my own thread and say the samething! I thought it was going to be really cool, I was looking foward to it even being a lowbie, but its a big let down pretty much with most things that people list minus it being hard. I love thakittens hard.

The other thing I will add is that some of these bosses are pretty much burn them or have a really tough fight or just flat out die. I rather a longer time limit on this and have an actual fight with the champ then pew pew as hard as I can.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Queen's Jubilee is ruining Open World.

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The one problem I have is they are almost always sticking stuff in the none event areas like these ballons, pirates, illusions etc etc. It completely kills the atmosphere the area. It is ok with like normal Holidays but its far too often. I wanted level up but I refuse too cause I will be running into stuff that kills it for me, I am an RPer.

Also 2 weeks is just too much. The game is no longer casual and not because of stuff being hard, because there is too much stuff to do and with a time limit on it. x.x

You want zones to always be the same? This is part of the dynamic world Anet is trying to create.

Changing it from satellite dishes, to holograms to pirates to ballons in farmer Joe’s field isn’t that awesome of a change.

Now what was done with the Great Collapse was, too bad I missed it QQ

This Living Story will take places over months. Holograms, sky pirates, sky merchants, balloons are a small part of the overall storyline.

The Great Collapse was only a way to cover up scraped content. This update is better than a hole in the ground.

I don’t mean to be rude but this make no sense in why you even posted this cause it has nothing to do with the origin concern I expressed.

You are looking at each of those things as separate. But they are all linked in the overall LS. You have to fit the pieces together to understand the story.

On your other post you think unique events kill the RP atmosphere. You just have to work around the game if you want to RP. The game can’t remain static and safe just for RP’s.

You are not getting it -_-

Queen is pregnant?

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

She has an alien in her belly!

A lot of people want to play bad guys.

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

You can LFG and require 6k+ AP and see how fast you turn into a bad guy.

Or simply act like a majority of the gaming community which is well hated.

Do you know what'll be hilarious?

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

A leperchaun told me * Burn DR down! BURN THEM ALL!*

Toughness does nothing...

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Armor seems to be that constant thing in games developers failed to implement properly. I seen very few games make armor/defense useful.

Speculation on what the Queen has to say

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

You will have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair!

To Scarlet: Post here!

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Dear Scarlet,

Bring the hole back and while your at it make sure to summon the Mad King out of it cause hes the only non joke of a bad guy I ran into even with the candy corn, plastic spiders etc. he still FAR scarier then a bunch charr playing with matches, moles, 3D monsters and battery operated pirates with some chi-pet tree pirate leading them.

Thank you.

PS Plz light yourself on fire and hang yourself when you complete this task, thank you.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

A lot of people want to play bad guys.

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

If your playing Charr you are playing a bad guy! :x

Scarlet and the Lunatic Court

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The Mad King for me has been the only INTERESTING character thus far and storywise too. Make him a bit more serious and it would be amazing!!!! <3 <3 <3

Don't slaughter people in Divinity's Reach

in Clockwork Chaos

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

I want to see the placed razed to the ground! Now that would be a permanent change to the game! :s I also want my hole back!

Still Deadeye farm?- Bad move Anet

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Problem is people who don’t feel like farming it are gonna be doomed to buy anything if ever cause of inflation. You can say that such people fault but then again if the insane farming was never in the game to begin with, everyones closer to a reasonable standard.

So I've finally lit up the darkness...

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Yes, all bosses should sling wet noodles at you, or should I say the exact same spot on the ground, over and over again that way if players can’t pick up on not so subtle patterns and sill manage to get themselves hit it won’t hurt too badly. It’d be terrible if we designed a game around observations and practice.
+1 for this thread for sure.

Un-nerfed Mimiron in WoW had a list of skills that 1 shot you or nearly 1 shot you. Amazing and fun fight because of how it worked even though you almost always died instantly if you messed up your movement even once. Again was still fun!

So I've finally lit up the darkness...

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

I am sincere when I say this but I wonder if it is possible to even give us a challenging fight without the cheap stuff with how the game itself works.

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

1) Our view of society is informed 100% by our bias – we will see what we want to see.
.

I view this more as an opinion and not a fact. I do not agree it being a 100%

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Queen's Jubilee is ruining Open World.

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The one problem I have is they are almost always sticking stuff in the none event areas like these ballons, pirates, illusions etc etc. It completely kills the atmosphere the area. It is ok with like normal Holidays but its far too often. I wanted level up but I refuse too cause I will be running into stuff that kills it for me, I am an RPer.

Also 2 weeks is just too much. The game is no longer casual and not because of stuff being hard, because there is too much stuff to do and with a time limit on it. x.x

You want zones to always be the same? This is part of the dynamic world Anet is trying to create.

Changing it from satellite dishes, to holograms to pirates to ballons in farmer Joe’s field isn’t that awesome of a change.

Now what was done with the Great Collapse was, too bad I missed it QQ

This Living Story will take places over months. Holograms, sky pirates, sky merchants, balloons are a small part of the overall storyline.

The Great Collapse was only a way to cover up scraped content. This update is better than a hole in the ground.

I don’t mean to be rude but this make no sense in why you even posted this cause it has nothing to do with the origin concern I expressed.

Queen's Jubilee is ruining Open World.

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The one problem I have is they are almost always sticking stuff in the none event areas like these ballons, pirates, illusions etc etc. It completely kills the atmosphere the area. It is ok with like normal Holidays but its far too often. I wanted level up but I refuse too cause I will be running into stuff that kills it for me, I am an RPer.

Also 2 weeks is just too much. The game is no longer casual and not because of stuff being hard, because there is too much stuff to do and with a time limit on it. x.x

You want zones to always be the same? This is part of the dynamic world Anet is trying to create.

Changing it from satellite dishes, to holograms to pirates to ballons in farmer Joe’s field isn’t that awesome of a change.

Now what was done with the Great Collaspe was, too bad I missed it QQ

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

and with no replies from a Anet employee to boot to show they even really see this as a problem.

Oh they’re not stepping into this wasps nest. They are staying clear of any heated discussions on sexism in video games.

Although I think if you were to ask the designer(s) of the Watchknights why they made it so blatantly sexual, they would probably respond with: “We just thought they looked nice”

Given that’s what one of the artist friends I mentioned before said when I linked them? Yeah that’s probably a good call.

Pretty much :P or make up some lie about it :s

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

I’m honestly not sure what the point of this thread is anymore. At this point NO ONE is bringing any new argument to the table, and NO ONE is budging from their stance no matter how good or bad the arguments are ( and there is a ton of both), and with no replies from a Anet employee to boot to show they even really see this as a problem.

That is because people don’t read and don’t understand concept of opinions.

You must nerf deadeye farm once again

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

People are still farming deadeye like crazy some people got 800g (should be considered an exploit) from deadeye farming already and will continue to generate money like crazy until you put a stop to it.

And you can’t farm him, poor boy?

Wait, how do you know I can’t farm him?

I never tried tbh. This is borderline exploit, so not touching this with a 10 feet pole.

When you think about it, if you go in and beat him WITHOUT any gambits you are getting 1 bag per 1 queen ticket, adding gambits only makes it so instead of doing 5 runs you do 1, therefore in theory if deadeye got nerfed to hell people would move onto the next cheese (1/2/3 gambits or just plain kill him for a bag).

Just need to put in diminishing return. That’s it.

This is exactly what should of been done in the first place.

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Hi, everyone. Just wanted to pop in here with another note.

If you disagree with the OP, that’s perfectly fine. However, attempting to silence or shut down discussion by frequently posting and reposting your opinion, and continuing to harp on your points in an attempt to convince people they’re irrational, simply because you disagree with the OP is not fine. If you disagree with the OP—go ahead and post, have a polite conversation, but please don’t try to bully people into agreeing with you.

This kind of behavior is drowning out other voices. We have seen at least one person decide to leave the thread because of it.

If this continues, those who are engaging in this tactic in this thread will receive a suspension.

Thanks for your attention.

Thank you and I was wondering if that was something that could be addressed or not.

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Can someone lock this thread already? This silly argument has gone long enough for the fact its has now 9 pages.

This is very sad if this thing upsets a community to the extent they need to give descriptive details and showing images to defend their argument when overall it’s not a big deal.

We get it
Section A

  • does not like the model, but wants to criticize Anet saying shame on them for putting this out for a assumption of a certain audience. That’s ludicrous…

Section B

  • Does not see a problem whats wrong with the image because it’s not their first time seeing something like this before. They just know its a new model that happens to have female anatomy and nothing more.

Section C

  • Plays the game focusing on getting more gold and karma not caring about the model or anything. They just play the game to have fun and not to stare at something for more then a second wondering whats wrong with it.

I guess I’ll fall into Section D then.

Section D
See that the shape of the model is a great tactical decision in the art of war. because if you could distract your opponent even for just a few second that a lone is an advantage.

I had always assumed that this was why women’s fantasy armor is always so devoid of anything like physical protection: they get a +4 Distraction bonus to AC.

No our skin is as hard as iron except for are private parts so those must be armored!

Boom Boom Baines....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

I don’t think they are just talking about the fact she uses bombs. Breasts have begin called boom booms and Baines a girl!

Living story with fem bots, girl with double meaning, the madness! /discuss

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Saying I need to keep a distinction when I already have and explained why does not sound like you disagree, it sounds like I failed to do this overall which leads me to believe you did not read my post.

You said who am I say this or that. I already stated it is my opinion so why this statement?

In short you are being redundant with some points.

No, not just you…..you know you and I aren’t having a private conversation here right?

Also, just for the future. If you don’t want people to skip what you’re saying, try not quoting an entire wall of text, putting one sentence, and then further down expanding on your point by quoting someone who is quoting to what you said.

It’s REALLY hard to go back, consolidate all your points, quote them all, and address them all. My advice is pick a post you want to reply to, quote the parts you want to address, and create a clear and concise reply in one post. That way anyone coming along can see all your thoughts in one spot.

Or not…I’m not the boss of you.

If you are responding to my post, I read it as you are talking to me. If you wish to talk in general I would suggest not quoting someone. That is at least how I understand it works with debates on the forums.

And yes I could of deleted at least part of that wall of text but I always mess it up and I only said one thing anyways : P

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Forgive for me saying but you do need to read. I said in posts, it is my opinion or I * feel * this way. I don’t think I can make it much more clearer that it is my opinion.

Also I also explained my reasoning which appears you either did not read and/or understand.

I read. I understand it is your “feeling” and your opinion. That doesn’t mean I don’t have something to say about it. You shared your feelings, and opinion, and I shared mine. Welcome to the forums!

I also read your reasoning…I just didn’t agree.

Saying I need to keep a distinction when I already have and explained why does not sound like you disagree, it sounds like I failed to do this overall which leads me to believe you did not read my post.

You said who am I say this or that. I already stated it is my opinion so why this statement?

In short you are being redundant with some points.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

They still don’t need areolas.

You are correct, they don’t need areolae.

But, and I don’t mean to sound rude here, they also don’t need to be designed with your specific version of what you deem to be appropriate.

I understand if you don’t like that design choice, and that is your prerogative, but who are you to say what a design does, or doesn’t need? I noticed in a subsequent post by you that when you start adding certain “parts” it makes things sexual.

There is a big difference between sexualized and sexual. A mother feeding her baby in public is not sexual. A statue/painting of a woman on the side of a Greek building is not sexual. A female/male nude drawing is not sexual.

This distinction needs to be kept in mind when talking about art.

I don’t mean to sound mean when the say the following things. I said in posts, it is my opinion or I * feel * this way. I don’t think I can make it much more clearer that it is my opinion.

Also I also explained my reasoning which appears you either did not read and/or understand.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

You missed my point. When things start having areolas, nipples and [ since the word is filtered, I will deem it the hole between the legs ], it starts at least to me, expressing sexual things.

Not to be snarky, but if you look at Watchknights and see “Sexual things” then…well…ok, I don’t really know what to say.

It’ll suffice to say that no one – male or female – that I know thought “Sex” when seeing the big clockwork battle robots.

My main point is the intentions of the creator. One can draw a naked women as art and another draw the same thing but with sexual intentions even though it may be the exact same creation.

In regards to these robots, I see no reason for them to have such detail as areolas. Forgive me for repeating myself but people can’t seem to read or can’t comperhend AREOALS. Not the breasts, not the butts, not the high heels, at least for me, but the areolas.

As said before if they were robots created by a sexy vampire or a succubus it would make sense for them to have sexual themes, nipples, areolas, the southern region since its censored otherwise.

So in short, I feel the intentions of the creation was of a sexual nature and not just an artistic one or one based with another reason such as given example above.

They have such detailed areolas because the artist designed them that way. Is it at all possible that your feelings about the artists intent are incorrect and that you are overreacting?

As I said, I * feel * that it was done in a sexual way. Could I be wrong? Yes as I am not 100% but given other elements in the game, some of the outfits, the size of the breasts and I don’t mean there is anything wrong with having big and/or huge breasts as selection but the fact most of them are DD+ with little choice of smaller ones, leads to look at that.

I do not mind sexual theme things to an extent of course but there is a time and place for it and sometimes that is just the theme of the game.

Dragon Crown for example I find very humorous and the art is for the most part excellent, I personally do not like the amazon. Her exggerations don’t seem to flow well as the others do. I expect in that game 3 things, huge bouncing boobs, giant pecks and food. Not sure if food is big thing in DC but it was in the 2 previous games. But the way the art and theme of the game is done works.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Blazing Gun Champion broken?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

I cannot find Blazing GUn anywhere last for achievement.. Could someone help me?

It is random which knight spawns. You just have to wait on RNG :/

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

You missed my point. When things start having areolas, nipples and [ since the word is filtered, I will deem it the hole between the legs ], it starts at least to me, expressing sexual things.

Not to be snarky, but if you look at Watchknights and see “Sexual things” then…well…ok, I don’t really know what to say.

It’ll suffice to say that no one – male or female – that I know thought “Sex” when seeing the big clockwork battle robots.

My main point is the intentions of the creator. One can draw a naked women as art and another draw the same thing but with sexual intentions even though it may be the exact same creation.

In regards to these robots, I see no reason for them to have such detail as areolas. Forgive me for repeating myself but people can’t seem to read or can’t comperhend AREOALS. Not the breasts, not the butts, not the high heels, at least for me, but the areolas.

As said before if they were robots created by a sexy vampire or a succubus it would make sense for them to have sexual themes, nipples, areolas, the southern region since its censored otherwise.

So in short, I feel the intentions of the creation was of a sexual nature and not just an artistic one or one based with another reason such as given example above.

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

They still don’t need areolas.

They don’t need heads, or arms, or legs, or eyes, or feet, or anything else for that matter.

They could just be spheres that roll around and have retractable blades for rolling into people.

You missed my point. When things start having areolas, nipples and [ since the word is filtered, I will deem it the hole between the legs ], it starts at least to me, expressing sexual things.

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The audience of the game isn’t you and your personal tastes. Some people might like to see something sexualised. Judging from all the human females running around in skimpy armour I’d say a large number of players care a great deal about that. Are they all people who should grow up because they want something from their fantasy MMO that’s different to what you want?

I don’t think the number of players running around in skimpy outfits, is a good excuse to justify objectification of women in games as a whole. MMO’s especially have a tendency for immature designs, that over-sexualize women. I personally don’t think that’s tasteful, or healthy.

There are plenty of girls who play GW2 and go for the “skimpy” outfits. I watched the GW2 stream where someone from ArenaNet was playing a human female ele and showing people how to get started in GW2. It stood out to me that she was very excited to buy a purple bag (her whole character was purple, hair, clothes, bag etc). As I watched her play, I was amazed at how I could see up the character’s skirt as she ran, it was designed to stand out (I’m not claiming that she chose that armour, obviously it’s every human female’s starter armour, I’m just pointing out that this kind of stuff exists already and it’s perfectly fine). The starter clothes are far more sexual than the robots, and unlike the robots they are actually supposed to represent humans (which the player controls if you want to view that as another way to make it wrong – males creating attractive female avatars subservient to their every key press – it’s not as sinister and some people in this thread would like us to believe).

Video games are always going to present idealised versions of people. The men will generally have trim, buff bodies and the women will be trim and curvy. I don’t really see why there is a problem with these as options, and I actually think it’s narrow minded to suggest it’s something which specifically targets females. Norn males will often go shirtless and have very masculine and muscular bodies. One of the key characters for this chapter (Braham) is even showing a nipple, and Logan is your stereotypical pretty-boy.

Guild Wars 2 doesn’t objectify women, it goes to great lengths to do the opposite (to the point where I think the story is dumbed down to accommodate this agenda). There is an entire race which was designed to portray females as masculine to the point where maternal females aren’t the norm and the main physical difference between males and females are their tails (and neither asura nor charr females use the female armour models). The human kingdom is ruled by a Queen, not a King which is standard in the fantasy genre. She’s not as formidable as Olenna Tyrell from Game of Thrones, but she’s certainly not portrayed as weak. I suspect her character was designed to appeal to females more so than males. In many ways, her relationship with Logan is a stereotypical gender reversal (the queen is almost portrayed as asexual while Logan is painfully written as a clingy, love-sick puppy dog – another way the story goes out of its way to promote females at the expense of male characters). Several factions in Tyria are lead by a female (Order of Whispers, Vigil, Sylvari etc) to the point where I think the females are outweighing the males in the power/numbers ratio. Destiny’s Edge is made up of three females and two males, the Living Story so far has only one male protagonist (Braham) but four female protagonists (Rox, Kasmeer, Kiel, Marjory).

If you played GW2 and think that it teaches people to think of women as objects, you haven’t paid attention to anything past the character customisation screen. Some people seem to think that if something is sexual (especially if it’s the female form) it’s somehow degrading or morally objectionable. It’s not, it’s the context which matters most, and in the context of GW2, women are standing in a pretty good place. It’s the height of irony to me that this thread is so large during a month where the story focuses around the Jubilee of a female queen. The Watchknights, while clearly emphasising the female form, are not portrayed in a sleazy way. They aren’t sex bots, they are potent fighters. As far as it being unrealistic for them to be shaped the way they are, boob armour is unrealistic, magic is unrealistic, giant cat people are unrealistic, almost every greatsword skin in the game is unrealistic, most of the asuran combat animations are unrealistic. It’s a fantasy MMO. The fact that we get to see and experience things which aren’t in the real world is part of the fun.

Awesome post.

They still don’t need areolas.

Queen's Jubilee is ruining Open World.

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The one problem I have is they are almost always sticking stuff in the none event areas like these ballons, pirates, illusions etc etc. It completely kills the atmosphere the area. It is ok with like normal Holidays but its far too often. I wanted level up but I refuse too cause I will be running into stuff that kills it for me, I am an RPer.

Also 2 weeks is just too much. The game is no longer casual and not because of stuff being hard, because there is too much stuff to do and with a time limit on it. x.x

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

When I made my engi I gave her as tough a look at the game would allow. I would have preferred a body type with smaller breasts though, but they weren’t available. Take a look.

There are a lot of body types many of us would prefer in games, but we have to understand the limitations the developers have. There is nothing wrong with requesting more diversity though.

We just have to make sure we don’t say, “I couldn’t make smaller breasts, therefore sexism!”

The size of the breasts are the concern which happen to come with the body. When most of the breasts are DD+ it is obvious without argument. It is like saying Lara Croft just happens to have huge boobs but has nothing to do with using that to market to male gamers. -_- Though I love Lara Croft, I will still not deny that fact.

What do you expect from FAKE breasts. Of course the Watchknights have FAKE large breasts.

Small FAKE mechanical breasts just wouldn’t look right.

Please read the post. This is not in regard to the bots but the body selection for Norns and Human females.

Eh, I’m personally ok with female norn body shapes.

It’s the barbie doll humans I hate. But then with the right armor even that can be hidden

I don’t mind them having big and or huge boobs. I personally wanted them to be a seperate selection was all so if peeps wanted too, they could chose the body the wanted along with the breasts being breasts are a prominent feature.

I don’t mind being * bone * skinny because I am already dead! No pun intended! X D

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

When I made my engi I gave her as tough a look at the game would allow. I would have preferred a body type with smaller breasts though, but they weren’t available. Take a look.

There are a lot of body types many of us would prefer in games, but we have to understand the limitations the developers have. There is nothing wrong with requesting more diversity though.

We just have to make sure we don’t say, “I couldn’t make smaller breasts, therefore sexism!”

The size of the breasts are the concern which happen to come with the body. When most of the breasts are DD+ it is obvious without argument. It is like saying Lara Croft just happens to have huge boobs but has nothing to do with using that to market to male gamers. -_- Though I love Lara Croft, I will still not deny that fact.

What do you expect from FAKE breasts. Of course the Watchknights have FAKE large breasts.

Small FAKE mechanical breasts just wouldn’t look right.

Please read the posts that I am responding too. This is not in regard to the bots but the body selection for Norns and Human females.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

When I made my engi I gave her as tough a look at the game would allow. I would have preferred a body type with smaller breasts though, but they weren’t available. Take a look.

There are a lot of body types many of us would prefer in games, but we have to understand the limitations the developers have. There is nothing wrong with requesting more diversity though.

We just have to make sure we don’t say, “I couldn’t make smaller breasts, therefore sexism!”

The size of the breasts are the concern which happen to come with the body. When most of the breasts are DD+ it is obvious without argument. It is like saying Lara Croft just happens to have huge boobs but has nothing to do with using that to market to male gamers. -_- Though I love Lara Croft, I will still not deny that fact.

Watchknights' chests....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Did you really have to give them something that looks like areolas? x.x

Are areolae bad? Are areolae only exclusive to females?

Does the presence of these areola make these robots any less capable, formidable, or respectable?

I guess for me, I don’t see how having feminine traits makes something negative. I don’t look at that robot and think that the queen should have opted for strong, shirtless, robo-men.

I’m personally happy to see awesomely designed, feminine robots, in a position of authority, power, and equality. It doesn’t make me feel like less of a man, it doesn’t make me feel like women are just robots to command.

To me, they are just a really cool design in a video game.

I feel * my opinion* the theme doesn’t go well with who they represent even though she is a Mesmer which is then related to Lyssa which is the goddess of beauty. Having them be female is fine. However I feel its been push to a sexual stand point which for example, if Jennah was Succubus queen, I would expect as such if not more such themes.

There is a time for such things and I feel this isn’t one of them and was simply was over done.

Art isn’t always just art either, sometimes it done in a sexual manner without any pornographic material. Dragon Crown is a perfect example :P. Beautiful, art work but obviously someone loves boobies! Even so, it still remains beautiful artwork!

Did ANET think about Upscaled chars?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Queen’s Gauntlet will return, possibly as part of the activity rotation or even other events. In any case, you’ll be able to complete those achievements at a later date.

The problem still lies with past events and possible future events. It was an absolute PAIN to get a group to do AR much less try to do it for the achievements simply because I was not a lvl 80. I would assume you will have future events that will work like this.

I think with these instances and or events, people need to be put to lvl 80 with all the skills and traits available. Upscaling seems to work fine stat wise so the problem left is not having double or triple stat gear depending on your level.

Watchknights are a bit concerning....

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

If you think the high heels was bad see my thread for more provocative stuff!

https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/livingworld/jubilee/Watchknights-chests/first#post2569141

Remember when games were actually hard?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Dark Souls = From Software, they knew what they were doing, every enemy have it’s weakness and you can defeat bosses even naked. Peoples were doing speedruns of these games.
Guild Wars 2 = Anet just put things mindlessly, they think that they’ll make boss with million hp and it’ll be challenging, it’s not challenging, it’s frustrating and stupid.
Get use to “challenges” like these, I’ve read one of the designer comments and they think they are design mastermids.

They didn’t know what they were doing if you can kill it naked and at lvl 1 and you could 1 shot some of them if you stacked right. Great design bosses but still some major flaws in terms balance with skills and gear.

cough comparison of warriors in pvp and pve of this game, 90% of the bosses being easier to cheeze than story mode vets, zerker 0 cc pve “meta” Im sorry but no mmo can ever be as good in terms of balance as a rpg that was made for fun (what says a lot about the design decisions soft coded into the formula).

An MMO is different then a single player RPG because people are always competing on what class is better over whoms. With a single player, people tend to pick what they just enjoy more then whos the best. There was definitely class issues in that game with certains bosses. My friend play the complete opposite of what I played and some bosses were dumb easy for and others hard vice versa with them.

I am not defending the bosses in this game, just saying Dark Souls isn’t nearly as perfect as people claim it to be is all :P

The bosses in this game need a lot of work but I believe it is possible.

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Why don't you just erase pets from this game.

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Again this a mistake GW2 devs should of never made to begin with because it has been seen in other games prior to GW2, and has been corrected. WoW for example your pets take a massive reduction from AoE dmg as passive that is automatic. This made them absolutely 100% useful for raids. They also were immune to certain bosses skills depending on the boss so pretty much unless the boss melees your pet, its good as gold.

Remember when games were actually hard?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Dark Souls = From Software, they knew what they were doing, every enemy have it’s weakness and you can defeat bosses even naked. Peoples were doing speedruns of these games.
Guild Wars 2 = Anet just put things mindlessly, they think that they’ll make boss with million hp and it’ll be challenging, it’s not challenging, it’s frustrating and stupid.
Get use to “challenges” like these, I’ve read one of the designer comments and they think they are design mastermids.

They didn’t know what they were doing if you can kill it naked and at lvl 1 and you could 1 shot some of them if you stacked right. Great design bosses but still some major flaws in terms balance with skills and gear.

So should I wear goggles for Liandra?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

…or do they do nothing? I heard she cast Power Word: Epilepsy!

Molten Alliance tied to Aetherblades?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The nightmare court is a specific set of ideals that some sylvari have. Why cant a sylvari be evil without being a part of the court? Sylvari are shaped by the world around them, one could easily do that.

Actually if you think about sylvari, it’s kind of sad. We throw what are essentially children into the world to find their own way. Its no wonder some of them come out bad.

It’s not a matter of it can or cannot, it is a matter I personally find it weak and something else could of been done to make it better. Again this is my opinion that the story could of been taken a different direction that would of made it a lot better.

Remember when games were actually hard?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

That first goomba in the first mario has killed more people then Liandra ever will!

Molten Alliance tied to Aetherblades?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

The mysterious Sylvari being Scarlet is…weird. She doesn’t look like she was corrupted by the Nightmare.
Sylvari aren’t always nice and good. They can seem ruthless. But plotting to assassinate someone to take power in a pirate council…That’s something we haven’t seen from Sylvari.

Eh, I wouldn’t put it past Faolin personally if she could get past her torture and Dream corruption fetish.

I would like to apologize though that we even an that arguement. : 3

(edited by Meriem.3504)

Molten Alliance tied to Aetherblades?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

I believe Scarlet is Kasmeer because ANET confirmed the “Personal nemesis” is SOMEONE during Secret of Southsun, and Kasmeer is a “Legendary” with Unshakeable buff. Seems kinda suspicious.

Personal nemesis of what?

logicly the person we seen in the opening is not the nemesis(unless shes very very stupied and masterminding so much as she has i cant belive that)
so i would gess the sylvari we see is the front person or a middleman if you want between the mastermind and us and that will make the mastermind someone of a race we dont know yet, but when we see her we will know is all we know, from that we know its a person all our toons know in some way(that just leaves most of the personal story and all the living story), and my gess is thakittens lady karamie(or how its spelled) given that she has been present almost every living story so far makeing her a a possible candidate but are there more?

Sometimes doing the most obvious thing is the most confusing. We would expect her to be hiding but perhaps she sits out in plane sight cause no one would suspect her to do something dumb like that. I think its called reverse psychology.

Molten Alliance tied to Aetherblades?

in Queen's Jubilee

Posted by: Meriem.3504

Meriem.3504

Since my previous post is to long.

On to the sylvari.

I’m sorry, but your opinion would lead to some horribly boring and 1 dimensional characters. Even Caithe, a good Sylvari, has some cruel tendencies because the world has taught her to.

That is the basis of the Sylvari. A new, young, and naive race. Each Sylvari either grows, learns, and adapts in their own way……or they die.

I do not think so at all and that is your opinion. Again this why you come off hostile cause you come of condescending when your comments. You make think it would make one dimensional characters, that is your opinion. Do not sit here and dictate what is right and wrong. I made it clear it was my opinion and if you don’t agree that is fine.

Thank you for the info on the Charr. I would ask this is put back on topic now cause regardless if I like it or now, the evil tree is in league with the pirates.

And you are entitled to your opinion. You are however not free of criticism of said opinion. You call it hostility, I call it being blunt and you just being a tad bit over-sensitive. I’m not going to sugar coat stuff.

Constructive critism and this is my point. I asked nicely to please stop and you want to continue. Instead you want to keep going and going. Please STOP and put the thread back on track.

It is still on topic actually. You have a problem with a Sylvari potentially being the one behind this all, I’ve simply explained why there is no issue with it in regards to the lore.

But since you have an issue with the very discussion you began, then ok we can drop it.

I know I started it and I am ending it. I did not expect to turn into this. I believe I failed to make myself clear on the whole sylvari thing. I do not like all the lore for them, you do, that’s it. It works fine with the lore that I know of. Thank you.

(edited by Meriem.3504)