Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: GuilguiS.2738

GuilguiS.2738

There’s always a balanced solution and here it is:

Don’t add stats to the Bloodlust buff!

Simple as that.

(edited by Moderator)

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: KeBo.4567

KeBo.4567

I won’t be updating the vote again. It seems to be quite clear what the consensus of the WvW Community is. This vote only indicates the active forums members opinion of the buff. However one thing that should be considered by Anet is that anyone who has such an interest in WvW that they spend their time when not playing it on the forums really have a vested interest.

My personal opinion of the buff is that it will be extremely detrimental to the game. Unfortunately it will give the larger servers an unfair advantage. Before my time in WvW stat buffs were trialled and failed due to the imbalance caused in favour of the stronger servers. Just because you change the mechanic by which they are received doesn’t negate the problems that they cause.

This will also ruin a thriving community of Guild vs Guild players. Whatever your opinion is of the people who are active in this community both the players and Anet should understand that they are WvW players as well. They don’t GvG all the time and spend most of their active game time in WvW.

The real way to discourage blobbing is to introduce new maps and lower the player caps on each as this will cause the blobs to spread out. However this will not fix the problems with the match ups as the server with the most numbers will most likely always win.

That being said though I play on Ring of Fire. As WvW communities go we are quite small but tight knit. Basically every week recently we have had some pretty poor match ups. Caring about the PPT is pointless. What keeps us playing WvW is the skill involved when we fight. Meeting blobs in open field combat and taking them down even when facing 2 or 3 times our numbers. When the fights become tipped even more in our adversaries favour this will be ruined.

What really needs to happen is the developer’s need to create some test servers for WvW. This would allow their ideas to be properly tested prior to being implemented into the game. Getting real feedback from players on what works and what doesn’t. Otherwise how can the developer’s truly know what sort of effect anything will have on the balance of their game.

Based on 154 Responses
Yes 18.19%
No 81.81%



Kylar | Leader of Coordinated Chaos [CC] | Ring of Fire Server

(edited by KeBo.4567)

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Slomo.1029

Slomo.1029

This isnt a simple “yes” or “no” question. Its more complicated by now.
If you mean the actuall buff: no, not really.
If you mean the mechanics around the buff and how you obtain it: yes.

~ Gandara

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Aneu.1748

Aneu.1748

I feel a buff is required but not one that involves raw stats added to one particular server… its simply asking for strong servers to be even stronger.

Aneu | [VoTF]
http://www.votf.net

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: ParaldaWind.4523

ParaldaWind.4523

I agree with both of the above posters. We need something, just not a stat bonus.

No tears, only dreams
[PYRO]
Maguuma – youtube.com/pyrogw2

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Esuni.2498

Esuni.2498

NO to stat bonus

Yes to kills on stomp with something added to make it more attractive

Aurora Glade – Esuni [TUP]

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: RashanDale.3609

RashanDale.3609

This isnt a simple “yes” or “no” question. Its more complicated by now.
If you mean the actuall buff: no, not really.
If you mean the mechanics around the buff and how you obtain it: yes.

basically what all the previous posters said:

Do i want a buff tied to objectives in the center of the borderlands: YES
Do i want this buff to give stats or other in-combat-advantages to players: hell no.

there were so many good suggestions for alternative bonuses:
-the point-on-stomp
-faster upgrades
-increased/faster supply-caravans
etc.

“Revenant is actual proof that devs read the necromancer forum” – Pelopidas.2140
Gunnar’s Hold

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: DanyK.3842

DanyK.3842

I’m pretty sure no-one wants the stat buff aspect of it and once the new orbs come out I’ll most likely quit the game as it ruins the whole purpose of it for me.

Sir Dany | Twitch
110k WvW kills | Champion Legionnaire, Paragon |

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: yurdo.6985

yurdo.6985

stat buff, big no no.
non combat advantage buff, sure. for all I care give them 10000% increased magic find, just no stat buff

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: blenheim.6489

blenheim.6489

No, not in its current iteration. Scrap the league kitten while you’re at it, too. Worst idea to date for WvW.

Gawdwyn

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Bogey.5423

Bogey.5423

No to stat buffs and even bigger NO to stomp buffs.

[Hex]

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Manuelito.6081

Manuelito.6081

If you mean the actuall buff: no, not really.
If you mean the mechanics around the buff and how you obtain it: yes.

[ROCK]
Desolation

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Reslinal.2359

Reslinal.2359

stat buff: no as it creates a snow balling effect
non-stat buff: yes

Blackgate Engineer

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Istaf.1953

Istaf.1953

NO to stat bonus

Yes to kills on stomp with something added to make it more attractive

Pretty much this

[RET] Medicalstaf
Guardian
Fort Aspenwood

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: BlazeQ.1095

BlazeQ.1095

Yes

I need all the help I can get because I suck

Cold Beerdrinker
PB Officer
NSP

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Dranul.2094

Dranul.2094

No to stats and power creep. I remember words from ANET – there would be no grind, there would be no power creep.

Between ascended and soon ascended armour, the difference is getting bigger and bigger. Grind2win, rather than WvW being open to all (as they envisioned). Almost becoming like WAR, with RR gear destroying fresh 80s. It pretty much is already, the WXP, skill less, pvd karma farmers with their 400+ WXP ranks and like 10k kills have much more use in WvW – like draining supply with trebs, defending their precious points. While the guys with 200 wxp ranks and over 100k kills get penalised.

How bout some rewards for WvW kills.

Dranul – Guild Leader – The Unlikely Plan [TUP]
Aurora Glade EU
http://theunlikelyplangw2.guildlaunch.com

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Slomo.1029

Slomo.1029

There could be so much stuff they could do with this buff and yet they want to implement the easiest solutuion and also the most boring one: static stats.
Oh, btw. its also the only thing people activly asked not to bring into WvW.
I really hope we get something better for the 2nd season.
Good luck for the first season Devon, without any preparations to WvW bringing all this stuff you worked on in a single patch you’ll need it. I hope your dedicated WvW playerbase doesnt decrease too much within 7 weeks so you can bring us something more interesting that that.
Otherwise PvE folks will be happy.

~ Gandara

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: lollasaurus.1457

lollasaurus.1457

Yes to a buff, NO to a stat bonus.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Zackie.8923

Zackie.8923

what is this buff everyone is talking about’??

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: MartyPartys.9187

MartyPartys.9187

Agree with all above, the borderlands revamp looks awesome and I cant wait to roam around, a buff is also nice, just NO stat buff.

We know you once intended wvw to be a casual game, but the majority wants it to be competitive. A stat buff will only cause snowballing and make it even less competitive as it is now as PPT will mean nothing.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Slomo.1029

Slomo.1029

what is this buff everyone is talking about’??

There will be a buff that you get if you contol at least 3/5 capture points for two minutes in the updated borderlands map (coming next patch).
The buff itself will give you +50 to all primary stats and finishing players with a stomp will give you +1 point. So stomping 5 players in a fight will be worth as much as controlling a camp.
Each borderland will have a bloodlust buff and will effect the other BLs and EB.

~ Gandara

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Tellerion.8102

Tellerion.8102

The stat increase such a buff would give is a massive NO, it’s clear for everyone to see, apart from the devs, that it’s guaranteed to have a negative impact on WvW as a whole, for obvious reasons.

Although I understand that there needs to be something of value for people to fight over these buffs, giving them a stat boost isn’t the right way to go. The extra points for stomping people however is an idea I like.

~~Ayeres~~

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Dream In A Dream.7213

Dream In A Dream.7213

yes to buff on own borderland only. No 3xbuff.
I am not sure about the stat bonus. It might work in conjunction with outmaned buff, but as it stands it might just invite more uneven fights.

NO to the League system.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Brando.1374

Brando.1374

No x9000!!!
/15 char

Xxkakarot [GF] Good Fights
Dark Wizard Incar [GF] Good Fights
http://www.twitch.tv/xxkakarot

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Asudementio.8526

Asudementio.8526

Yes i want a buff and an orb mechanic. The buff needs to be impactful, stats is one way to do this- there are surely better ways but we will just have to fight for them.

Leader of [Suh]
My moves are fresh, like my groceries.
#TeamEvonforever

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Zackie.8923

Zackie.8923

what is this buff everyone is talking about’??

There will be a buff that you get if you contol at least 3/5 capture points for two minutes in the updated borderlands map (coming next patch).
The buff itself will give you +50 to all primary stats and finishing players with a stomp will give you +1 point. So stomping 5 players in a fight will be worth as much as controlling a camp.
Each borderland will have a bloodlust buff and will effect the other BLs and EB.

too complicated lol

i like the orbs from last time though.

i remembered chasing the orb stealer across the whole map, it was insane and excitingly fun.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: LameFox.6349

LameFox.6349

The stat buff: of course not.

The rest: looks like it has potential, though I’m not sure why they’re using it to push that finishing move rubbish on us.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Noss.4105

Noss.4105

No.

omnommnomnom.

N*** Dew Gunnar’s Hold
WvW Roaming with Mesmer

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Sylpheed.8163

Sylpheed.8163

No to stat buffs.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: met.9653

met.9653

Yes, i support stat bonus. This will be best wvw patch.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: lordkrall.7241

lordkrall.7241

Yes, I think it is a good way to break up zergs and “force” people to spread out and actually work together.

Krall Bloodsword – Mesmer
Krall Peterson – Warrior
Piken Square

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Altie.4571

Altie.4571

Yes,
Pending to see how it works, if higher population just zerg gets it then it doesn’t help the current situation, if it promotes scattered game-play then it will be great.

When scientists discover the center of the universe,
a lot of people will be disappointed they are not it.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Master of Timespace.2548

Master of Timespace.2548

I want the new areas but no boring static buffs that offer no gameplay element.

? <(^-^><)>^-^)> <(^-^)> ?

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Cactus.2710

Cactus.2710

No to the stat buff since it simply (and inexplicably) compounds the balance problem between servers.

There is one semi-positive aspect of the bloodlust buff, though. It proves rather conclusively to anyone who has played very long that the ANet devs are totally out of touch with WvW. If any of us had any hope that the original promise of WvW (large scale, strategy-based, multi-mode, open world medieval-type warfare) would be met, we pretty much know better now. We didn’t ask for this buff, we mostly don’t want it, and it’s going to compound other shortfalls in the game design … yet we’re going to get it anyway instead of countless other things that should be addressed.

Random and extreme changes are the crutch of the clueless.

D/D Thief who prefers mobility to stealth … so yeah, I die a lot
Stormbluff Isle [AoD]

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: ViRuE.3612

ViRuE.3612

NO to stat bonus

Yes to kills/stomps counting towards PPT.

And while I’m at it NO to guards traits etc increasing stats as well.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Pavel.8531

Pavel.8531

NO to stat bonus

Yes to kills/stomps counting towards PPT.

And while I’m at it NO to guards traits etc increasing stats as well.

^Was just about to type that. I hate having stat advantage/disadvantage over someone just because I/he have played more wvw than the other, or some other external factor.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: NeHoMaR.9812

NeHoMaR.9812

Does anyone knows the stats this buff gives? If is not too big, is not a problem.

This time we will be able to remove/get the buff easily, even one single player can do it? a thief for example.

If the above apply, my answer is yes, if not, is no.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Slomo.1029

Slomo.1029

Does anyone knows the stats this buff gives? If is not too big, is not a problem.

This time we will be able to remove/get the buff easily, even one single player can do it? a thief for example.

If the above apply, my answer is yes, if not, is no.

+50 stats per buff. Potential 150 stat points in Power, Toughness, Vitality, Conditiondmg. and Healing. You decide if it is much or not.

No, one single player cant remove it easily since it takes ages to cap a point.

~ Gandara

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: MarMaster.6241

MarMaster.6241

No to stat buffs via orb mechanic, no to Applied Fortitude, no to Guard Leech.

Some other non stat buff server enhancement for capping the new points, yes.

Stomps give ppt, sure. Still not a fan of stealth stomps.

Dragonbrand (JQ) [FIRE]bats ~ Trusted member of the Universe
Mar Steadfast G, Silent Intrigue T, Mar Fidget Engi, Mar Fierce W, Silent Awe M
In GW2 since BWE1 ~ ~ ~ Guild leader of Legio Romana [LR], too

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Zikory.6871

Zikory.6871

YES

I know were in the “sky is falling” phase of the patch notes but honestly this happens every change. Have of us cry a lot the other try to defend it, no one knows how its going to work out in real time yet. Wait and see, it may be awesome.

[KnT] – Knight Gaming – Blackgate
Zikory – Retired Thief
Zikkro – Zergling Necromancer

(edited by Moderator)

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: TainoFuerte.8136

TainoFuerte.8136

No. Stat bonuses cause me the same sick feeling Guard Leech and Dumb Fortitude do.

Unbalancing an already unbalanced gametype to… I guess goad me into SPvP maybe?

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Hule.8794

Hule.8794

1x Bloodlust = 100% magic find, 100% gold find
3x Bloodlust = 300% magic find, 300% gold find
Outnumbered – 100Vitality,100toughness, 100 power, +5 supply

This would have 2 effects – Bloodlust would be demanded to have. And it will reduce loot problems in WvW. And it will give outnumbered servers a chance.

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Tyldor.9078

Tyldor.9078

NO to stat bonuses
Yes to kills/stomps counting towards PPT.

Grandmaster Tyldor
Leader of Business Class [BC]

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Tellerion.8102

Tellerion.8102

Do you guys really fail to see how this will make the strongest servers even stronger?

~~Ayeres~~

(edited by Moderator)

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Deniara Devious.3948

Deniara Devious.3948

NO

We already got Power of the Mists, which offers similar bonuses to the servers based on their score in their current match up.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Power_of_the_Mists

I do not want more power to snow pile on the server which has superior numbers and coverage. I have suggested some defensive buffs to the structures and NPCs and to a smaller degree players on a heavily outnumbered side, but I have explained already well before that giving offensive bonuses even to the outnumbered side is a bad bad idea. Giving offensive map wide boosts to the side, which is already winning, is just plain madness and a great way to drive off the outnumbered side back to pve and other games.

Bloodlust would be bad for guild-vs-guild, who want as equal fighting ground as possible (e.g. stacks from weapon sigils must be nulled before match). EB jumping puzzle is difficult location for gvg and the long queus to EB might make gvgs a thing of the past. Arenanet should be careful not alienate their hard core player base.

Deniara / Ayna – I want the original WvWvW maps back – Desolation [EU]

(edited by Deniara Devious.3948)

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Luiz Swordbreaker.6547

Luiz Swordbreaker.6547

NO
Don’t want any sort of stat buffs, the mechanics are fine, and I actually like them though

[Scnd] Use Your Illusion

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Mooodster.3470

Mooodster.3470

yes i want it but on another note this is nonsense sense 29 people should not be able to speak for the games other 1000+ players who wont come to the forums for whatever reason

(edited by Moderator)

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Furiousbeard.7602

Furiousbeard.7602

NO

Not in its present form. I like the points for stomps, but the stat buffs are not needed. Snowballing will happen again just like the original orbs.

FA has got a small SEA population, so against a server with a large SEA population that flips everything to paper on us and has all 3 buffs before NA logs on , it will be a difficult task to push back. It is a measure of coverage, nothing else.

FA Soldier of Fortune – Flashypants (20,078 WvW kills) http://m.youtube.com/user/Duppa81
Roamer: 99.99% BLs / 0.01% EB

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: Zikory.6871

Zikory.6871

YES

Instead of working on changing bloodlust. Something they already put man hours into, spend time working on a option for GvG. Since that is the main issue with the buff yeah?

GvG is not the main issue of the stat increase the buff will provide.

Do you guys really fail to see how this will make the strongest servers even stronger?

That isn’t the point of what I said. Its getting implemented, regardless of this post. This whole system is bring a whole new meta where small man groups can be extremely effective for your server, was that not the complaint last week? Need more for small groups?

[KnT] – Knight Gaming – Blackgate
Zikory – Retired Thief
Zikkro – Zergling Necromancer

Simple Solution to The Bloodlust Controversy.

in WvW

Posted by: MiLkZz.4789

MiLkZz.4789

/no

Sir Cuddles The Fluffy

Warrior of [VcY], guild from Seafarer’s Rest
First troll to receive 10/10
Best golem driver EU