Guild Wars 2

Only coming back for the week to farm these pvers and throw siege on their bodies \o/

How to save WvW is, removing WvW and make all PvE maps PK zones. Every map that has a WP with a “structure/build” a node…your ppt for the ppters

what effort for the collection when ppl just buy them??!?!?!

you assume I only have 7 for one heavy characteer while I have 7 other sets for medium and light, that is roughly over 10k gold I spent so your point for some kid with legendary armor that is worth a avg legendary wpn?

or give wvw players free rune extractors and changing our ascended armor stats for free too, problem solved.

still disable cuz while I still have to have 7 armor sets for wvw and now kids with legendary only need 1 since they can change their runes anytime.

Shazmataz.1423:

I certainly hope that legendary armour cannot be used in wvw if it is pve only there is no viable way of attaining it via wvw …surely that is only fair.

Yes

I’m curious why is the patch of SAB starting on a Thursday and ending on a Thursday instead of the usual Tuesday patch days?

Birdy told me that the Balance Team is pushing for condi to get stronger so there isn’t going to be a nerf to condi, soo therefor WvW is going to be screwed

Its Blackgates fault, and ANet can’t fix what players purposely ruin the game like yourself
:^)

Transfer to a server where there is activity, server pride is dead,.

JQ is not full, please get a pair of glasses and look.

Did the poll vote for it a few months ago and its taking longer than your usual “Big Patches”, every patch has been insignificant to WvW since Linking and Skirmish was introduced.

https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/wuv/WvW-Poll-Next-Project-Priority-Closed/first

Or is this scrapped like you scrapped Battlegroups?

Its better than before where I didn’t even bother to continue to do the recommended dailies for pages when I had the Legendary Backpiece right when it was available to craft.

Said player should get alien ware

Player issue on ele, out of position to get ally buffss and cleanses :^)

Dusty Moon.4382:

I move from kitten T4 then moved to T3 where I currently am. I noticed an improvement in the game. Not as laggy. I suggest something is going on with your PC or connection.

Less people in a zerg, the less the PC has to work.

I came from t1 where its known for blobbing…

Why is t2-4 lag is more sever than T1?

How is killing an AI “skilled” in gw2?

WvW will be balance when t1 is only Mag and BG locked forever and get deleted by ANet and also delete t4 servers

It seals boons on interrupt not life steal, and yes it works since release of HoT.

Nerf dmg condi and epi first.

Is Support working for anyone else, I’m getting some privacy error, can’t contact when working on Chuka and Chamapawat IV: Secluded Tour, and get a bug for Craze’s Folly Feasibility Report when I finished the JP

As if you can see in this thread, by a Dev posting about scoring. We already know it was coming so quit your complaining.
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/wuv/Let-s-Talk-Scoring
Learn to read please.

The only stats you got right were backline rev, rest is -_-….no wonder people 1 push on inc.

MaLeVoLenT.8129:

Thanks. Good Job. Way to go. Very good. Impressive. Makes total sense. Just like Opening BG. Perfect. Good job. Make WvW great again.

^

McKenna Berdrow.2759:

The team has been looking at ways to improve the server identity within the World Linking System. We have come up with several potential solutions, and we’d like your feedback on them.

Solution 1: Alliance Names Proposal

Every time worlds are linked, an alliance name would be generated for the linked worlds.
• Names would be generated from a pool of names that we create.
• Once a name is being used it would not be used again until the pool ran out of names.
• NA and EU would not share the same names.
• An alliance name would be preserved until every name in the pool of names was used. For example, the linked worlds of Crystal Desert and Eredon Terrace would always share the same alliance name until all names in the pool were used.
• The alliance name would be used instead of the host world’s name in almost all areas of the UI. Specifically, it will be used as the map name, the name that shows up when something is captured, and the name on the mist war panel. On the mist war panel, the + would continue to list all the worlds in the alliance.

Solution 2: Guild Focused Proposal

Instead of having an alliance name, worlds would be referred to by their color.
• The borderlands would now be called Red Desert Borderlands Green Alpine Borderlands, or Blue Alpine Borderlands.
• The color designation would replace the “host” world’s name in almost all areas except within announcements.
• When objectives were captured, the name of the guild that contributed most when capturing the objective would be displayed. For example, “Objective Captured! [Guild Name] has captured [objective name].”

Solution 3: Some Guest Names Proposal

In areas where there is more player involvement, such as capturing objectives, guest world names may appear.
• When objectives are captured it would now display the guest world’s name: “Objective Captured! [Guest World Name] has captured [objective name].”
• The map name would remain the host world’s name.
• We would not display guest world names to enemies because we believe that would make fighting enemies more confusing since it would be harder to tell which world you were fighting.

Questions:
1. Which proposal is your favorite?
2. What, if anything, would you change about any of the current proposals?
3. Is there another proposal you think is better?

1. 1 and 2, I believe WvW should focus on Guilds more than random pugs following a tag. At this state of the game, there is very any insensitive for a guild to be WvW focus and have a purpose, guilds these days are disbanding one by one. When there is basically 1 or 2 guilds left, that be the end of WvW and pugs dont keep wvw alive or a pugmander
2. Solely focus on guilds more
3. No

Been on every server, and will go to whatever server with the guild to get fights.

McKenna Berdrow.2759:

We could achieve more balanced competition in a world-versus-world setting if we had more pieces to join together with the World Linking System. It currently is not possible for us to establish an “equal” number of players on each link/world with the current world sizes. You may recall this initially was mentioned by Tyler a few months ago.

For example, world populations currently look something like this:
• World 1: 95%
• World 2: 82%
• World 3: 81%
• World 4: 60%
• World 5: 30%
• World 6: 10%

Since our final world total needs to be divisible by 3 because we need a team for each color—Red, Blue, and Green—we either need to avoid linking any of the worlds, or link some worlds even if the result is that they have the advantage of a larger population.

• Worlds 1+6: 105%
• Worlds 2+5: 112%
• Worlds 3+4: 141%

After linking, the difference in population between the highest and lowest teams is much narrower, but the third rank server still has significantly more population than the server that previously was ranked first. Also, the result of this theoretical world linking is that all worlds are now above our goal population cap, and probably have moderate to heavy queues.

If we instead had twice as many worlds, but if each had about half the population, it would be much easier to create linked teams with similar populations. This would lead to better matchups for everyone, and encounters would be less predictable. In this scenario, we would allow players free transfers to the new empty worlds for a period of time. These worlds would start out linked so that they wouldn’t begin in an empty state in a match-up. We would lower the player population cap on all worlds so that more worlds would become and stay “Full.” The result would be that guilds that want to expand would have an excellent option to do so with a move to these new open worlds.

Having outlined some of the thinking behind this proposal, we’d like your feedback on these three topics.
1. How do you feel about this proposal?
2. What, if anything, would you change about this current proposal?
3. Would you be interested in transferring to a new free world?

1. I like it very much.
2. Lock old servers and change them to pve variant and new ones will solely be wvw.
3. Yes I will and will transferr where my guild will get the most fights

Server pride when servers started buying guilds and I am one of those filthy players that will take servers gold to transfer for fights.

All Glicko Adjustments have been reset on prior to reset links.

+1 T3 SMC is the plague of EBG

Well it should like ever other boss in this game has a breakbar

Why hasn’t there been a actual break bar to break yet?

Guildhall wvw track booster will add up to 312, celebratory or birthday booster don’t work for some reason.

When is Hall of Monuments points get the rewards for 31-50 points, the titles are pretty much worthless of getting those achievements from Guild Wars 1. Also when will it be out of “beta” on the website?

Don’t run 75 on one pin.

It was a necessary change. The random pve players that just come in the use the crafting stations, are consider WvW players just stepping into citadel for just using them then leave a few minutes later to going back to pveing, those players cause the server population influx of being full status or very highl etc.

Nidome.1365:

So if I run out of food/sharpening stones/oils and wish to craft some more or I wish to access the materials in my personal bank I have to leave home border and re-queue.

If someone calls out in map chat that they need help defending something while I am crafting I won’t see it any more because I won’t be crafting on home border.

Why?

I have seen plenty of complaints in WvW, but the presence of crafting stations wasn’t one of them.

That is why there is a Provisioner add to WvW to buy food with badges.

Sadrel.5623:

Kekkei Genkai Kage.5930:

Your bank vendors can be accessed through a fully uprgaded keep or the guild register if you are smart to figure it out.

No, you can only access your guild bank at the guild register, not your personal bank.

You are wrong, you can go talk to the guild register look at the left side of on top of inventory slots, there is a tab that you can click and drag down to give you the option to “Inventory” or Account Vault" that is your way to access your BANK through the register.

Your bank vendors can be accessed through a fully uprgaded keep or the guild register if you are smart to figure it out.

Best Update SO FAR!! THANK YOU!!

Ty Rekz

Killing guilds who can’t recruit on the server they are on cause its dead. no thanks for locking every server, just lock hibernationgate and tarnished carts

Tyler did announce of possibly locking the servers for the first half and killing more guilds and servers and making people not wanting to play anymore.

Dont lock the servers are shouldn’t be “full” every host server in t2-4 are nothing close being full besides DB?

Sooo when PvP and WvW gonna get their own versions of legendary armor for being hardcore player in those modes. Still waiting WvW exclusive legendary back piece aswell, why are we WvW players left out of our own versions?

Pompeia.5483:

Dawdler.8521:

Kekkei Genkai Kage.5930:

So on the relinking on the 24th, will there be a preview of the next linkings of paired server and also will the servers be locked on relink?

I doubt it. Anet will probably they do it to prevent rigged matches (ie guilds transfering on purpose) but in reality not telling anyone who links with who will give them a major gemstore boost because WvW players will be suckered into scrambling to another server, as usual.

Or they could, I dunno, get better instead of leaving to get carried and easy mode? Kinda the players own fault if they think they need to keep swapping around.

My guild and I want to know and don’t want to be linked with a t1 server that will clog queues during our raid time so if get a preview and if we get linked with a t1, we want go to a server that isn’t linked with t1

So on the relinking on the 24th, will there be a preview of the next linkings of paired server and also will the servers be locked on relink?

Having multiple accounts when gw2 went on sale for $10 helps to get more coins, so far hording 5 stacks through dailies

Adding a some new Tracks that would give new Finishers or Mini Pets like PvP hero tracks for Stronghold would be awesome. Also having a new Finisher that ties to the PvP rank with a new Rank Finisher for each tier finisher, Possibly like Shatterer Dragon finisher like the Mordrem Dragon Finisher that ties to Heart of Throne expansion