Guild Wars 2

Ilrzal > Kat JQ dah ada guild lom?

My only grief for the heirlooms is that it doesn’t help with the civilian escape activities at all. They should have put civilian hiding there instead of rubbles and every save counts towards number of civilian evacuated.

Between the 2, Fall of Abadon and the reactor blow up, the former should be harder to make.

Therefore shouldn’t we give the Abadon team more time than just 5 months?
“Save the best for last”. Reactor first then Abadon is the way to go.

I would not mind waiting to have the Fall of Abadon polished and not rushed.

Which is why we should vote for Kiel.

Yeah I got the 3000 pts reward today, but only got the Large Achievement Chest. No Radiant/Hellfire Vembraces Skin.

Thanks and it worked for my 2nd and 3rd characters.
All this while I thought the rewards is one-time only per account.

the shroud of the “weekend” has fallen…
begun the “coverage” war has…

SoS has been winning (#1) 9 out of last 10 match-ups. And now they whining about balance? Give the other 2 tier1 servers the exact amount of wins, then you can talk balance…

Lanthrudar.1437:

Thobek.1730:

Liquid.9672:

Sunspots.9861:

BG shoud be fighting for second place. Any third place team that is new to a bracket that isn’t clawing and fighting for any success they can get would be foolish. If I played for BG I’d be squeezing the crap out of JQ at all hours because the best way to change the horizon of the T1 landscape is to first take JQ out of the picture. I have no horse in this race, but I do see things shaking up soon.

You can take 2nd place by squeezing PPT out of the leader too, while tightening the score at the same time thus leeching off their rating if you don’t manage 2nd. Win win. Just because a server is in 2nd place doesn’t always make them a softer target.

if you squeeze the leader then all you will get is retaliation from them, while 2nd place tries to create more of a distance between 2nd and 3rd. If BG were smart they would go after JQ while SoS tries to keep JQ from coming 1st. Then BG wouldn’t get doubled teamed and remain very close to 2nd place.

Umm, this is cowardly “logic”… #1 has the most points, yes? Is #2 and #3 take ppt from #1 the spread is double than if they take it from each other, regarding trying to catch up.

If #1 loses 20 points and #2 or #3 gain those 20 points that’s a 40 ppt change. If #2 or #3 take points from each other all they did was swap 20 points, #1 is still gaining their 20 points per turn they started with.

One method the point leader loses double and drops faster, the other method the #2 and #3 may swap positions but neither alters their relation to #1. And if a server wants to win they must make #1 lose points over time. That’s a fairly simple concept and should be easily understood..

It’s in the #1 team interest 100% of the time to have #2 and #3 fighting each other because it helps them keep their lead.

Exactly, the point is if and only if the game is about winning point (and to keep the match-up competitive till end), #2 and #3 must not waste manpower and resources fighting each other but to 2v1 #1.

In short, team that can deny point to #1 while gaining point themselves before end will be victor.

But we know better to have FUN and slug each RED equally in tier1 …

declan.3968:

No Malaysians in JQ? impossible!

We are all nothing but ninjas
You don’t see us.

You could try Harvest, Mining, Logging then Crafting. For hunter (Ranger) I would suggest Huntsman and Leather Work.