Guild Wars 2

You do realize this coming week has several days of announcements that a red post has said will target veteran players? Now, they may be underwhelming, they likely won’t be the panacea so many critics are demanding, and they certainly should have been done faster than this three-weeks-dripfeed, but before you yell about “NOTHING” at least let them serve the whole meal.

I can’t be the only one getting sick and tired of these QQ threads.

1. More mounts (the broom’s a mount, accept it)
2. Minipets travel no more than ~1 meter behind you, not the mile down the road we have now.
3. More ways to customize character appearance. Slot for non-weapon specific auras ect. Maybe give every race the option of body tattoos?

Also inb4 this turns into the “my ideas are more deserving than your ideas” kittenstorm we all know it will become.

I have over 3500 hrs with 10 80s and still no Legendary. They are not attractive IMO and EVERY one of my chars is fully geared and all have non-legendary weapons I find much more attractive/fitting with their armors. Not to mention, I main a Thief and a confetti shooting pistol and a short bow that fires unicorns is the most ridiculous things I’ve ever seen and don’t give me the impression of a lethal killer that strikes maliciously from the shadows. Meteorlogicus for an ele is the only one I find remotely appealing and/or appropriate; superfluousness of the great swords aside.

PowerCat.5738:

That’s so awful. You give 400 gems to some people, and everyone else is left to rot in the dust?

That’s how marketing works. You take a segment of a population, and base business decisions on the responses in that sample. When done properly, your results are pretty accurate. A business saves money by doing small sample sizes, rather than pay for an entire population. Gifts are not uncommon when it comes to taking a survey. It’s a small incentive to get someone to respond, but not big enough to influence the answers.

he’s fine >_>   chillax

I completed W1Z3 in tribulation mode for the second time today and I still haven’t got my final achievement for Glutton for Punishment. Its 25 achievement points that I’m sure I’ve earned, but I’m not getting it for some reason. Has anyone else experienced the same issue?

NB: I completed W1Z3 in tribulation mode yesterday for the first time. No achievement then either.

Chrisplosion.3756:

How dare they not hand you the level on a silver platter, those kittens! Dwayna forbid you have to actually do something to progress.

Make it a skill-based check and not a herpa-kitten -I’m-a-grind-monkey check. Heaven forbid they make you actually have a modicum of talent and not hours to kitten away grinding currency.

How dare they not hand you the level on a silver platter, those kittens! Dwayna forbid you have to actually do something to progress.

Here is where you’re wrong OP. He reached his target audiance. SAB is a game with in a game. Anet obviously gave him artistic licence to develop content geared toward players with a higher skill level.

Tribulation mode is extreme yes, but even the SAB was advertised to be a more challenging jumping puzzle.

World 1 was a totorial, but the difficulty was always going to increase.

This is a small bit of higher difficulty content with in a big game of more casual, passive content.

There is nothing wrong with releasing niche cotent with in your game to cater to different groups of players at different times.

The mistake you are making is that all content should be for all people all the time, because no content can be that.

I dont mind achievements being tied to mini games, if people actually played (as intended) them for the achievement. But, Im kind of getting tired of loading into a mini game and being yelled at by achievement farmers, when I try to play the game the way it was intended. This has happened to me in Keg Brawl, Crab Toss, and Dragon Ball.

TW could have at least went to DB and made it more interesting. I feel bad for you DB guys lol,

(pssst let’s both hit JQ )

I did something bad – not going to tell you what exactly, I don’t want to get banned! I got in jail in Rata Sum ! I just wanted to share this with you.

Ditto. Got the set, love that there’s no RNG involved in it.

Got the pets!

Thanks you!

Another happy customer here

< One Happy Customer

ArenaNET: THANK YOU for listening!

Seeing this item in the gem store, with no RNG, meant an instant buy for me.

That’s how I like it!

You’re kidding right?

IMO people who got 10+10 laurels this month probably won’t get any laurel next month.

This bug is actually getting to me. SPvP is the only part of the content in GW2 that I don’t like and don’t want to do. I’ve done all the monthlies and dailies that gave laurels, I even caught one of the bonus patch-day laurels, but I refuse to do the SPvP monthlies even for 10 laurels.

I would like it if either everyone got 10 laurels who didn’t get them or 10 laurels were subtracted from those who did. I’d prefer the second, but both are fine.

Can’t believe there is still no official word on this. Lazy programming like this has no place in a so-called “AAA” mmo, and this fluke should have been addressed immediately. Would it seriously be so hard to wait until the start of April to implement the monthly counter? The lack of foresight is mind-boggling, and the lack of response even more so. I’m losing faith in the developers of this game, and I’m sure I’m not the only one.

Sharkinu.8096:

It sucks. I did both monthlies before the patch. They should email those who did both monthlies before patch 10 laurels. I don’t mind people getting one laurel from daily, but 10? That’s a week and a half worth of laurels.

Exactly. People shouldn’t have got a week and a half worth of “ascended progress” just because they were too lazy to do their monthly before patch, but all hurried to do it as soon as this bug, exploit or whatever it is, got known. It’s really lame and imo they should either remove the laurels from those who got them without deserving them, or give everyone else a chance to get them too.

Yeah I’m kitten about this too. Now I’m 10 days behind everyone else for being proactive. I understand they might not be able to track when everyone completed monthlies, but at the very least they could have patched it out right away to limit the amount of people getting an unfair advantage, but it seems they didn’t even do that. Thanks a lot anet.

I always do monthy on first day , as i can see i lose always lol… im geting mad here now.

It’s not an exploit, but the current situation gives people who complete the achievements early a disadvantage when it comes to Laurels.

I received a response from support saying they were aware of the issue and they were thinking about how to fix it, but it sounded somewhat generic to me.

I hope they manage to either just give everyone the +10 laurels in some way or remove the 10 additional laurels from people who got them (I think solution 1 will result in far less complaints)