Guild Wars 2

:3 Bye bye YB. >3< You deserve it.

0.0;;

well… is it certain that we fighting meguma?

anyway, if any of my brother pinoys are in, give me a shoutout. ;3

O.o Man YB is persistent in trying to take our keep. >3< shoo shoo.

Was fun.

Sky blue, from our treb spot

Warriors are the brains of the battlefield. They, though not entirely strong, are the jack of all trades. Able to support, lead, and get things done, but not alone. I can say this with respect to almost all of the professions, but this is where we truly shine.

As a warrior, I’m usually at the frontlines and those behind me follow suite, and with my confidence, standing in the middle of fire and swarm of enemies, they gain confidence to fight.

I haven’t met a class, now, that can kill me 1v1 or 1v3. Though I can’t kill them, I’m able to call for backup and wipe things.

It’s because we can stop, heal, and take damage that we’re necessary in WVW. PVE wise, never had problem with this. It is easy. >3<

Take the notion of being a super killer, but the brains behind the result.

Just practice your warrior in ways you never thought of now. ;3 You’ll find a way to shine.

I’m a hammer warrior/sword and horn. And sometimes, an axe and mace/sword warhorn build.

:3 That’s life in the fast lane.

Maybe a peek a boo game?

Might as well as subforum per world.

Lmfao Dude Give Up.5086:

Got bored last night and had some fun :P

0.0 i was contemplating life at my emote spot in ebg and i read this.

Super rich >3<

700k + on critter bunny/fly/chicken >3< 300k achievement achieved.

How? get riffled – aim, kill shot.

I agree. But even if warriors are the weakest, I like it best. It is a fun class to play. And there are always newbies to pawn. >3<

if 5 is the strongest and 1 is the lowest, a warrior – in wvw would be on 2. Dont’ nerf us. Learn to play. >3< Buff us even.

Sea time report.

Not much,

Just roaming around, defending, and etc. I’ll be resting for a while and wait till EB and YB wakes up; so we’ll have some fun fights again later in the morning. Until then, time to nap and watch some anime.

Warcry!!!

Similar to signet of rage but applies to self and allies w/ stability. 20 2nds 180 2nd cooldown.

Props to these 3 Rawr thieves who kept perma stealthing and resurrecting each other every time we’d kill them outside durious.

Yey, some simple fun at CD BL.

Here’s my bebe Ciel.

stinkypants.8419:

Straegen.2938:

CD’s oceanic presence hasn’t really been online in force for a couple weeks (not sure why). If Kome and other guilds show up in force, EBay won’t stand a points chance. CD beat YB a couple weeks ago because of that. CD has a lot of missing WvW players these days even after the last exodus.

Oceanic’s been on holiday with their New Year celebrations

I do not know why but our sea team lacks the incentive to upgrade the keeps because we do not know if we have enough people to defend it when we go offline.

Also, it seems that we’re not really aiming to beat YB because of fear of going to higher tier- which will result to broken egos if we get beat 24/7.

So basically, it seems like CD aims to stay at 2nd place this week.

I hope the Sea team and Na team would talk these things out. Because me, being a guildless grunt, only observes. haha.

Either way, I enjoy the NA time if I wake up early. I actually fight lots of people. And just a few of us, 6-9 try to defend; and we over stack on our sieges to keep the enemies away. T.T

But, I can’t stay long due to work starts in a few hours.

Just checked NA ppl’s defended area. Man they placed lots of sieges. >3< I wish I was in this time zone haha

suprNovae.5410:

FINALLY! Thanks Anet I wish there would be no more orange swords but ok…25 is a good number.
This force finally servers to scout and hopefully improve the team play.

At least, someone is happy.

iggybl.5034:

So, we jump onto a DD ele, he uses vapor form to get away. Sounds legit; every class should have some mechanic to get away. We manage to down him; vapor form again and go through tower portal. Time between two vapor forms was maybe a few seconds max.

Lame.

Haha, cool story bro. >3< I know how you feel. 4 of us would down 1 ele, and it would do this to hide inside SM/keep/tower/base. And I’d like to pull the hair off my head.

stinkypants.8419:

Sovereign.1093:

Why are we odd? Our NA presence is little; so you guys won’t have much to deal with. But we have heart, and will bite your ankles to hold our land >3<

Our Sea presence is a lot, but EB and YB has little; so I can’t gauge if we’ve improved because we’ve been doing the PVD a lot. It would be nice to have some real battles at SEA prime time.

Yeah, it’s weird. I’m on late night PST so I’m there when we’re getting stomped then it seems like all of a sudden YB and EB disappear and there’s tons of CD on.

Actually… it’s kind of fun, I get to have a “come back as the underdog” fight every night

Funny thing happened. I made a new character, left the guild with that character, and suddenly my main has no guild. Are these heroes connected? . man, ahaha. I was planning on making my new character a guild leader; so i’ll have extra storage for my items. >3< huhu

hehe, it’s like we’re night capping them, and they’re night capping us. >3< pretty much a week for karma.

TimeBomb.3427:

1)It’s my opinion that the main objective with this change is to encourage larger zergs to split up into numerous smaller zergs.

2)Why? Because it’s a good strategy. It often leads to better coverage and better defense. PUGs often tend to gravitate towards one, or perhaps maybe two large zergs in a single borderlands. Splitting up into smaller zergs is and has always been, at the very least in many scenarios, a better strategy. Splitting up into smaller zergs is how you beat a single larger enemy zerg.

3)There are a couple problems with this change, though. The most blatant one is that 25 is too high. By setting this number to 25, they are essentially telling us that 24 or lower is a small zerg. For many servers, often even the higher tiers, this is not the case. I would feel much more comfortable if the number was 10-15, and I imagine that others would feel more comfortable with a smaller number as well.

4)The other problem is that the number of players that makes up a small zerg is often, on average, smaller on a lower tier server than on a higher tier server. While 5 will often give little to no advantage (to what is deemed as sizable zergs) no matter the tier, 25 might wherein that, while 25 is a small zerg in T1, it may be a large zerg in T8. They can lessen the impact of this difference between tiers by simply lowering the number of people it takes to make orange swords, as I’ve already said – ideally from 25 to 10-15.

First, I’ll number your paragraphs; so you will know which I am replying to, and will make things easier.

Second, time to address each paragraph, thus:

1. Why? A big zerg will always be the offensive force of a server. And infiltration group of 5 or less will do the supply camp capping. And a group of 2 parties will deal with defenses on towers/keeps/castles. So, whether the big force is seen or not will not really make a big deal because they can kill that which is in their way. And even if the battle signs won’t necessarily show if they person leading knows where to hide, and apply different skills by different professions, like veil of mesmer, thief’s etc. etc. (sorry if I mix and mash the names of skills)

Even if a group will separate, they will still join for protection. Imagine a small group of fish banning together in order to look like a bigger fish against a predator.

2. Well, I’ve talked about this in number 1. The main force doesn’t need to hide, and in tier 1-3, there are infiltration groups doing secret things but has communication with the commander or commanders in charge of a certain battleground.

3. I agree. 5 is okay, for my taste. So, there really is no need to change the current system. Maybe alter it. Or if the lesser evil be considered, something within 10 (and even 10- can kill 20/30 ppl if properly organized)

4. seems similar to your point 2.

While this is a good idea, I think the twitter post still lacks sufficient data for us to make a conclusion. Who knows what the devs are up to. Hopefully they will disclose the new information asap.

bring back the dolyak exp (1/10 – and only get exp upon tenth envoy) Hehe. >3<

Gamadorn.2659:

Porky.5021:

I’d be glad if they changed swords a bit more.

Make a new upgrade called “Alarm”. When the upgrade is complete, you get your orange swords back, but only at that location. Upgrade tier 2, you get your white swords back at that location.

Until the upgrade is done, you stay and defend what you take or you accept the risk that right after you run off, someone else may snag it right back without you ever knowing.

I actually like this…in fact…change the hire guards etc…to hire sentries that are posted on top of the walls in keeps and towers and if you end up in their LoS, they show an alert on the map….

I affirm. Makes the game realistic too, like the guards sending smoke signals that the keep/tower/castle is being sieged. >3<

Haldunius.7864:

TogoChubb.3984:

Haldunius.7864:

TogoChubb.3984:

This will not change a thing in WvW. We run a squad of 15 to 20 and don’t draw orange swords currently b/c we only use just enough at a time to not draw swords; also called strategy. This will just make it a lot easier for a zerg to not draw swords and make it harder for small teams to cap things b/c people will always assume it is a zerg hitting when they see the normal white swords. I currently rely on people ignoring white swords and chasing the orange swords. Zergs aren’t going to get smaller guys….they just now will be provided that much more cover.

Trying to follow your logics…Easier for zergs, harder for small groups, but everyone will assume white swords will be zergs so they’ll defend better. Just learn to defend the area you hold instead of relying on maps, which it seems like this change will do. Sounds right to me.

WOW! I have never thought about defending a structure. How would you go about doing that? Just to remind you that seeing white swords is relying on the map too. Nice argument, but you still haven’t disputed the fact that this change supports cover for larger groups. I simply stated that if you like zergging this is the way to go. I can’t see how this helps smaller groups.

Sadly, it appears defense will be a new tool in your kit of options. You have been relying on the map to tell you what structures are being attacked and the size of the enemy. I’d like all crossed swords to be gone. However, eliminating the classification tier and providing one warning at least forces squads to play a little more tactically. My apologies that you won’t be able to just cap a tower and move your zerg to the next location without leaving behind a few defenders in case the enemy’s zerg shows up to reclaim.

You are missing my point. I don’t care if it helps large zergs retain cover. I want more cover. I want more defense, tactics, and scouting.

I can respect your wants, but can you respect other people’s wants? That is where the disagreement will lie, differences in opinion. Which is why there are real wars in this world. haha

:3

playandchill.3908:

TogoChubb.3984:

playandchill.3908:

TogoChubb.3984:

What does that have to do with the price of eggs in China? T 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8 doesn’t matter. Increasing the cap for orange swords does only one thing…that is provide more cover for larger groups. I personally do not care if you zerg or if you prefer a small squad this change will only promote larger groups. So if you dislike zergs this is a bad idea. If you like zergs then this is a good idea. Speaking of T 1/2/3 and looking down your nose at lower tiers is irrelevant of what the change would do. If you use sound communication and strategy with the current orange sword mechanic you will not draw orange swords…as I stated currently we can send a squad of 20 at a tower and they never draw orange swords until we attack the lord.

What i said.

You obvisouly dont play in T1/T2/T3 where you have only 1 commander with 90+pugs behind him.

If it does not change anything for your so pro team on your low tier realm, it ll def have consequences for top tier where most of pug players play.

edit : T7 :/

Your argument is ignorant. T1/T2/T3 is no argument. Explain how this change will not promote cover for a larger group. That is all I stated it would do. So being on T8 or T4 is has no relevence to this conversation.

Because the game is not played the same way in T1 and T7. If you cant understand this, plz stop reading.

In Top Tier we only have 1 big 70+ Zergs the most of the time. This update ll help to split the zergs and small pug group (15-20players) ll be able to cap things without beeing spotted with orange swords. It ll also help small guilds to cap things. There are pugs everywhere, so if you only send 4 of your mates killing guards, chance are 5-6 pugs ll pop sword.

In your lower tier ( T7) you dont run with such big zergs. So yeah it ll probalby promote bigger group that you usually run with.

So you see , this new update may have different consesquences in T1 and T7.

Another point to consider is hiding isn’t really necessary if you’re running wit 70 people. o.o

TogoChubb.3984:

Haldunius.7864:

TogoChubb.3984:

This will not change a thing in WvW. We run a squad of 15 to 20 and don’t draw orange swords currently b/c we only use just enough at a time to not draw swords; also called strategy. This will just make it a lot easier for a zerg to not draw swords and make it harder for small teams to cap things b/c people will always assume it is a zerg hitting when they see the normal white swords. I currently rely on people ignoring white swords and chasing the orange swords. Zergs aren’t going to get smaller guys….they just now will be provided that much more cover.

Trying to follow your logics…Easier for zergs, harder for small groups, but everyone will assume white swords will be zergs so they’ll defend better. Just learn to defend the area you hold instead of relying on maps, which it seems like this change will do. Sounds right to me.

WOW! I have never thought about defending a structure. How would you go about doing that? Just to remind you that seeing white swords is relying on the map too. Nice argument, but you still haven’t disputed the fact that this change supports cover for larger groups. I simply stated that if you like zergging this is the way to go. I can’t see how this helps smaller groups.

4 ppl – 1 ram.
5 ppl – 1 cata

4-5 ppl – kill guards
put 1 ram – resupply
put 1 ram – break door.

kill lord – own keep/tower/castle.

This is sad. >3< Does this mean we have to roam areas at all time? Instead of orange swords, even if white swords show; we’ll have to be there?

This will take time in adjusting. Not something I am looking forward too. Though it would make my life easier as I love siege ing secretly.

RyuDragnier.9476:

I’d prefer if we got more people during the NA primetime hours, or at least if somehow YB and EB got the same amount of people as us online at the same times. Oh imagine the terrifyingly equal battles…

It would be nice if the score difference isn’t more than 1k per world. Or less. >3< it would be so fun.

But because each world has… players which live in different parts of the world, and the number might not be similar to another server. The disparity = this scenario.

This is not Aranet’s fault but the circumstance in which we gamers chose our World server. Preference so to speak.

Either way, I’m enjoying this game. Haha.

Good fight at YB, EB, and Eternal.

Means of defense – YB – the siege masters.
Means of balance between numbers and sieges – EB
The odd server – CD

:3

Why are we odd? Our NA presence is little; so you guys won’t have much to deal with. But we have heart, and will bite your ankles to hold our land >3<

Our Sea presence is a lot, but EB and YB has little; so I can’t gauge if we’ve improved because we’ve been doing the PVD a lot. It would be nice to have some real battles at SEA prime time.

I wouldn’t mind losing, or dropping a tier if we have some good fights.

Keep up the love.

Oh yeah, I don’t speak for CD. This is my own opinion.

Mubarizun.6435:

It boggles my mind how many people have left WvW. How can there be this many players but servers still have a hard time covering both EB and borderlands?

It seems to me that the lack of rewards from WvW are really taking its toll :/

I hope A-net devotes more time into WvW to catch up with it’s sPvP love because right now players like me seem unwanted.

I like tall girls with long hair, especially those with eyes nearing the color red. And I like it when they dress up simple, and don’t wear to much make up.

Now you might like the same kind of girl or something different. But it also means we both like girls.

Now there are guys who have different points of view. Some like short girls, chubby girls, and some guys don’t like girls but guys too. Or some don’t like anything at all.

Where am I getting at? Simply a person likes something which may or may not be similar to another. As we have so many players in this game, not everyone likes WVW. Some might find SPVP better and more appealing. Some might prefer dungeons, or PVE, or being a master BLTC tradesman.

This game caters to everyone’s needs and likes. Not everyone wants to kill another person’s character.

Intigo.1653:

Sovereign.1093:

Which server is RG based now a days? I’m hearing conflicting rumors >3< NA? EU?

We’re on Piken Square right now, as we have been since free transfers closed. Za Drots is on Seafarer’s Rest.

i see. Thanks. ^,..,^

Post more videos.

Which server is RG based now a days? I’m hearing conflicting rumors >3< NA? EU?

Prezzy.2783:

Bonesaw.2503:

Does anyone know of any really good Warriors on Youtube or ones that you like in particular? I can’t find too many good videos, or they are just old and their builds don’t work anymore.

I believe he’s called Wethaspou (forgive me if i haven’t spelled this correctly) – The guy solo’s Arah – nuff said.

w.youtube.com/watch?v=W0A0V5VaPyw

I could probably list more, but that would make it less fun for you to discover. Just look for it and you will find lots of awesome warrior videos.

The better question is, why are people not playing WVW?

If there is, not only in wvw, but also in pve, is to allow all wearable items with guild logo.

Straegen.2938:

Ruufio.1496:

We were all laughing and wondering who was in charge at Yak’s Bend at the time. Rushing golems into our door only to die to oil and a dozen siege weapons? lol

Look at that map picture above… they could have stolen so much from Crystal Desert with those golems lol. Many gold was wasted that night.

Kudos for holding out but that keep is incredibly hard to take when it is defended with siege. However some credit should be given to YB for trying to take it while it was being defended rather than running a PvDoor operation on it. If this were T3+ they would have been hitting it from SM on the outer wall and Veloka on the inner wall at the same time.

This shows the difference between their supplies and ours, CD and EB. >3< To throw golems like they are rams…

KStudios.2850:

Sovereign.1093:

KStudios.2850:

Sovereign.1093:

Hi from CD,

That was a nice fight in EB keep.

I commented on this, but apparently it was too full of truth for the moderators to allow it to remain, and they removed it.

Also…

Sovereign.1093:

Jinks.2057:

Did either Yaks or CD get skilled roamers since the last time we met?

At CD, we don’t do this roaming thing. You might meet at least 5 of us in an area of a solo newbie in WVW, either way. Just click the person and try partying him by typing /invite and then press enter or /join and then press enter, if you wish to chat and do duel type things.

Lol, again, by all means keep that underestimation flowing. I’m used to killing 2-3 at one time (and not even a thief). Simply because you cannot/will not roam solo doesn’t mean there are not those out there that are highly skilled at it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWGwaXKlZEk

Why the hate?

No one said you can’t do what you can. What i wrote there is simply so that guy could find some roamers to play with. So the person to whom our cd player are partied with won’t gang bang the dude.

Look at this nice SBI ranger. He was surrounded by all of us but we didn’t hurt him nor he us because we were civil, talking about duel and having fun >3< Check my mini map, he’s in the middle of our zerg, even our commander is in the background fighting with YB.

---

Anyway, it will be a pleasure, again, to farm your badge. ;3

The stating of facts does not necessarily equate to hate. Besides, there are far better avenues for 1v1. As for badges, best of luck. It does happen, only a braggart could deny, but not very often.

Assuming opinion as facts holds no water you know. Got facts? Show us proof. Else, it is heresay. ^,..^ Move to strike that dear Aranet!!! >3<

Just kidding. >3< See you in the battlegrounds.

Pendragon.8735:

Centhis.5071:

Poor Archer, I feel your frustration. My buds and I roam looking for small fights, we would even love a fight where there are only twice as many enemies as allies but we havent found any. No wait, me and my one guildy found 4 CD enemies at the Arah’s Hope supply camp..we thought for sure they would come out and fight us since they had us outnumbered 2 to 1…..we danced and waved but the four of them wouldnt chase us. After ten mins of trying to get a 2 on 4 fight, they started building ballista. They built 3 so we left. I dont hate them for it but its frustrating since every other camp we went to had at least 20 enemies just hanging out waiting for us to show up. How many people can a realm have to just have groups of 20 sitting around at every camp? And if our zerg showed (which is usually about 15 to 30 allies) enought enemies would show to paint the landscape. No fun at all I love WvW but sometimes it feels like there is nothing you can do but run with the masses which isnt really fun :/

Tier 4 is pretty populous. Might find more what you are looking for down lower, there was just a thread around the other day begging for small roaming groups to come to their tier.

There’s SPVP too.

KStudios.2850:

Sovereign.1093:

Hi from CD,

That was a nice fight in EB keep.

I commented on this, but apparently it was too full of truth for the moderators to allow it to remain, and they removed it.

Also…

Sovereign.1093:

Jinks.2057:

Did either Yaks or CD get skilled roamers since the last time we met?

At CD, we don’t do this roaming thing. You might meet at least 5 of us in an area of a solo newbie in WVW, either way. Just click the person and try partying him by typing /invite and then press enter or /join and then press enter, if you wish to chat and do duel type things.

Lol, again, by all means keep that underestimation flowing. I’m used to killing 2-3 at one time (and not even a thief). Simply because you cannot/will not roam solo doesn’t mean there are not those out there that are highly skilled at it.

Why the hate?

No one said you can’t do what you can. What i wrote there is simply so that guy could find some roamers to play with. So the person to whom our cd player are partied with won’t gang bang the dude.

Look at this nice SBI ranger. He was surrounded by all of us but we didn’t hurt him nor he us because we were civil, talking about duel and having fun >3< Check my mini map, he’s in the middle of our zerg, even our commander is in the background fighting with YB.

Anyway, it will be a pleasure, again, to farm your badge. ;3

Boldor Aran.8543:

Ok clearly after trying a lot of setups, I’m doing something wrong and need your help.

My warrior copes quite well in WvW, however I just came across a dual aze weilding nightmare warrior in Eternal Battlegrounds. Oddly 4 allies were ignoring him so I decided to attack it, epic mistake.
I bull charged him, sword slashed him, switched to hammer and smashed his face in with everything I had only to knock him down to 70% health, he knocked my 26k health in half in a few second blitz attack, then withdrew.
Now I know I can change my setup to deal insane damage, that’s not an issue, my issue is how he managed to create insane damage output with insane tank, 3 of me would have barely taken this guy out. All I could get from him is he had 2 x axe and used the regen healing sig.
Now I don’t have exotic, jewellery, but surely it can’t make such a massive difference? Or do I need to cough up and get start spending? I’m at a loss as to how I’m so weak….felt embarrassed to even fight him. Hides
Any ideas? I guess I’m a bit tired of swapping around my setup all the time.

He is a warrior with defensive traits but with berserker items. Or offensive traits but with defensive set and berserker accessories.

Nuuuuuu, my warrior isn’t that strong. >3< Nerf us not. Buff us yes.

KimchiSoup.8956:

Is it possible as a warrior?

I’m looking for something that can ninja a camp before the other realm’s zerg arrives.
…what weapon/build/armor would do that?

Time to put down my hipster horn build and buy a greatsword?

Yes. Take time though. The following combinations I’ve tried taking a camp with.

axe/shield (fastest)
hammer build with weapon/shield as back up (average)
mace/shield (least damage against us, but slowest in taking camp)

Note my traits are defensive and so are my items. >3<

average time of taking a camp – 3 minutes plus >3<

I don’t use consummables; so if you do use them, then camp taking might be faster and easier.

Jinks.2057:

Did either Yaks or CD get skilled roamers since the last time we met?

At CD, we don’t do this roaming thing. You might meet at least 5 of us in an area of a solo newbie in WVW, either way. Just click the person and try partying him by typing /invite and then press enter or /join and then press enter, if you wish to chat and do duel type things.

—

I hope the thread talks lead to posting more videos/screenshots and something that has bearing to the actual WVW rather than throwing insults with forum warriors >3<

Hi from CD,

That was a nice fight in EB keep.

KStudios.2850:

Love how about this time of night (4:42 AM Central USA) other servers get it in their heads that our mainland could be an easy source of “freebie points.” XD

Keep ‘em comin’ guys. Loving the free badges. I daresay I’m surprised I’m enjoying being so low, and not being in Crystal Deserts position. They’re gnashing teeth, nipping at Yak’s heels as best they can to catch up. Meanwhile, so far behind in the rat race, I’ve gotten over the notion of losing or winning and can focus on my one true love. Killing all your solo-roaming mes/theif cappers left and right.

haha ^,..,^ You don’t say.

Don’t generalize us CD players.

renmei.3102:

How is WvW in this tier? From the scoreboard it seems fairly even and T4 should be a little less zergy than T1 and hopefully less queues during NA prime time. Thanks for any info!

No Queue in CD NA primetime, same as all other times. 24/7 no queues in CD just a server filled with heart.

Fights are less zergy, more on strategy, and small groups. But I’ve met and killed EB/YB zergs, and have been killed by them since our server fights; so it is not essentially free of zerging.

If you are interested, please transfer to our server hahah.

Here is a video of how we CD players fight, mostly a few versus the many.

Black Scoutsman.5830:

Sovereign.1093:

Man, having SM has a lot of advantages(YB), which is very irritating on our part in defending QL and Durious. The twin towers <3.

Yeah that ranger there is me :/ We were so close to 2 manning that lord room. If it hadnt been for the couple stragglers that interrupted us a couple times, we would have had it. Props to Bloo luminance for the impromptu attempt at heroism with me. Was fun while it lasted lol.

Opportune moments are never wasted. At least no you learned that you could have taken it if it was more of you who attacked the Lord’s room.

Luckily some of our Crystal Desert players found out fast.

A shout out to my Filipino Comrades wherever you maybe . ;3 If you see or read this, please contact me. Transfer to our CD server. >3<

Man, having SM has a lot of advantages(YB), which is very irritating on our part in defending QL and Durious. The twin towers <3.

EB is scary. >3< Look at this screenshot. Anyone who says they are not many might change his or her perspective after seeing this.

Nuuuu. >3< YB VS Ebay VS ME >3<

You know, the quality of players as well as quantity can only grow if facing difficult opponents, and facing the same people over time will not allow for servers to try new strategies or even slack off eventually due to boredom of having to face the same people, no matter how great they are. >3<

Mainly the problem with this is going up and down this way will add a lot more challenge to the game, in a way of facing more difficult opponents, but most people, it seems as I’ve read in this thread simply want to win or make it easy >3<. Well, that’s not fun, imo. Got to earn it in the least.

Guapo El.1754:

Am I the only one who thinks WvW is totally broken. They map resets every Friday, and by mid sat green owns 80% of the pie graph. Now this may be because they are all running beast mode or there is way more players….but something should be down about this. I don’t mind taking a lose, but when its week after week of just getting destroyed….how is that fun? They did a much better job of balancing this out in the old AB in gw1…but this WvW is just getting old.

WVW is not meant to be fair because the strength of the server is based on the quality of players involved as well as the quantity of players involved. If per chance you are in a server that isn’t as active in WVW, then you will have to seek friendlies that might want to do some wvw in game. Else, you will not fully enjoy the benefits of WVW to its full. Moreover, you might want to transfer to a Server with more WVW.