Guild Wars 2

aye ? i thought WvW and CNB is still in there ?

how do i report this maguuma scum for hacking (speeed hack, invi hack and teleport hack) ? there is no option under report ….

so basically OP do not know how thieves play their game, and accused them of hacking ?

lol…..

Mags failed this time, this thread should have been locked by now, looking at the history….

yup…. limit numbers pls (lower them).

do justice to your servers (physical servers).

emmm ANET , can we start next week match up based on predicted ranking in http://mos.millenium.org/na/ (or the EU if you care) , and follow up the subsequent week with “winner up, loser down” rule…… ?

see how that goes…..

the wings remind me of Runes of Magic, that i played around 2009….

Sykper.6583:

azizul.8469:

a close match up is never a boring match up……

CD/YB/EBay/Mags/Kain match up will always bring a close match up i think, and very interesting ones…..

So what you are saying is….

We need a WvWvWvWvW map…

….Oh god the head-aches.

no no clever sir… i meant pick any three of those……

warrior, yes. and thief too. and they obviously hate ranger…..

like i said, ideally we want : number 2&3 vs number 1/leading server

reality : number 1&2 vs number 3/weakest server …..

deny all you want but that’s the reality….

a close match up is never a boring match up……

CD/YB/EBay/Mags/Kain match up will always bring a close match up i think, and very interesting ones…..

but what happened was usually the 2nd strongest server would attack the weakest server instead, because (they know) they do not have the strength to take on the no.1 strongest server of the 3…..

hence 2v1 is usually against the weakest server….

i’m using NA server match up for this discussion

it seems now server match up selection pool are divided into 2 groups, group 1 (rank 1-12) and group 2 (rank 13-24). however some servers are too powerful for few others.

perhaps the group selection should be divided further into 4 pools.
group 1 (rank 1-6)
group 2 (rank 7-12)
group 3 (rank 13-18)
group 4 (rank 19-24)

.. then we can have more or less fair match up…..

this is still unofficial right ? could be a troll note…

try this : http://gw2buildcraft.com/calculator/mesmer/?4.1|1.1g.h1|c.1g.h1.d.1o.h2|1c.a4.1c.a4.1c.a4.1c.a4.1c.a4.1c.a4|2w.d1e.2v.d1e.3v.d1e.2s.d1e.3s.d1e.2w.d1e|u3ab.u2ab.0.0.a3|2f.2|32.3i.3h.3j.3q|e

as long as they don’t touch my GS/mantra/illusion burst build, it’s ok…

if you don’t care about skin and achievements, like me, this game is grindless, well almost

lol.. a game don’t need to be any game killer to be good….

one problem with CD is that commanders refuse to use public TS. it is there….. use it. even the borderland channels are there, but no one is using…..

i don’t know what ANET is doing with these messed up match up system. collecting data ? sure but make the match up last only 3 days, and you get your data. hell, even change it to everyday like the early days of WvW , just to collect data……..

see.. few people agree with..

what is causing players to have this attitude ? bad match up system by ANET….. why bother upgrading a tower/keep that you know will be flipped sooner or later when you’re playing 10v100 ? profit from it….. like i said, we flip in turn, rinse and repeat…

it goes to NCSoft’s coffer. where does NCSoft spend it on ? none of our business…..

current system is designed so that towers and keeps usually belongs to the weakest servers are flipped as frequent as possible for us to maximize them on the WXP. you flip, i flip back, rinse and repeat, got that ?

enjoy it while it last…..

random match up only started 3/4 weeks ago, so only those weeks count i believe….

it’s okay guys, hopefully we’ll have different match up next week… we can do dragon bash this week ,and come back next week if we have more balanced match up like we had with Yaks and Kain…. getting stomped 4v40 is a bad WvW idea from ANET indeed ….

Sharky.5024:

And to prevent hacking, just make the orbs accessible, when the keep lord and/or one of the inner doors is down.

this was among the suggestions given to ANET when orb was in the game and orb hacking was all over the place, and yet none has been done. finally ANET took orb away, and everyone happy….

again NO ORB RETURN !

how about granting gems to losing servers, for participating… see how that goes….

nope, no need.. WvW is already nice without them…. no need to reintroduce the hacking prone feature….

bad idea OP… this will only lead to people transferring to already stacked servers….

huh… 2v1 usually occur against the weakest server……

still, is it necessary to have 3 medium populated servers for one language ? merge them….

i always wonder why the EU has 27 servers when almost half of them are in medium population status….

lower player number per WvW map, and introduce one time free transfer to the low rank servers….. problem solve…..

yup.. i have to agree… ANET failed miserably this time in an attempt to fix WvW….

everytime ANET do an update to the game, they will draw people away from cursed shore, hence less people farming the t6 dust……

current match up is worse than the idea of “winner move up, loser move down”…..

TitaniumDog.3054:

I’m inclined to think free transfers will only make the larger servers even larger. Now that matchups will always be random/unstable, if you want to be on a winning or competitive server then best to improve the odds by shifting to a large server. From now on whatever server you’re on there will be both competitive matchups and blowouts so better to be on the team stomping rather than the one being stomped.

not necessarily…. anet can make it so that on the free transfer day those stacked servers are flagged as full…..

current idea is good but the implementation is too late already.. some servers have grown to be so much powerful than others… lower the number of players per map , and give players a 1-time free transfer and you’ll see servers balancing out…..

yeah.. rank should be account bound, after all it is the same person that player each of the characters from that same account…..

reduce the number of player per server per map by half…..

no need to remove the AOE cap.. just increase it to 10….. for now….

this week me and my guildmates from [HAX] always try to paint the southern part of enemy borderland red during SEA time.

current match up system is good, but not fair due to difference in WvW population size. here is what ANET should do :

1. do a ninja update that lower the number of players per map by half to even out the current “not so fair” match up. at least being closer to being even. this will lead to full WvW maps on stacked servers.

2. make a one day 1-time free transfer so that players can move around to less stacked servers.

lol..OP why would ANET would want to do that ? high exchange rate would encourage player to buy gems and convert to gold, and ANET would love it if it goes very high because they know it would make it more attractive for players to buy gems to convert to gold….

we’re is an equilibrium state now…… price hike in gems price in terms of gold will be balanced out by people selling gems for gold…..

there are people who are taking the easy way because they have the cash (real cash), and there are also people who do not want to spend any more money into the game….. so they balanced out….

its a win-win situation for all, players get to exchange gems and gold, and anet get their money…..

anet nerfed all the possibilities to counter zerg. do not hold you hope high. 5 aoe limit, confusion nerfed etc……

current match up method is bad move indeed. winner move up loser move down would have been slightly better i think.

nice match up this week… had fun defending redlake tower on kain bl last night…… you guys (kain) came in 4 waves and we defended like hell…. lol

the great arrowcarts rule for few weeks now. last night we at crystal desert were defending a redlake tower in kaineng borderland against 4 waves of the the mighty kaineng, and we wiped them 4 times with the help of the mighty arrowcarts…. all the walls were breached, and we were trembling in fear, but then the mighty arrow carts came to our rescue…