But my opinion IS that you guys are being irrational (until proven otherwise in-game). I don’t see the problem here. :V
You’re missing my point.
I think you’re missing mine. :V
My opinion is that, so far (with maybe two story missions left to go), I like Trahearne, and that you guys are being irrational about him. I intended “proven otherwise” to be taken as “I’ll admit I was naive” if I turn out to hate his guts soon, not that preference can be “proven”.
:V
Considering that you provided no evidence in support of your assertions and actually resorted to an ad hominen attack on your opponents by saying that they must be “irrational” for taking the position they chose, and then tried to beat a hasty retreat by using the “I don’t expect an internet debate like this to end, since neither side ever seems willing to end it, so I’m not sure why I’m still replying,” you have all but affirmed that your position is untenable and that you have lost the debate.
Wait, what? I haven’t called her irrational in any way for her argument. My opinion on this Trahearne issue is that people are being irrational about their hate for him, since I don’t see what people are talking about. “Irrational” is not a bad term in this sense. It’s just my opinion that I feel like people are overreacting to him. :V Plus, how can I give proof of my personal opinion? Guess I can try.
So far it seems that he’s just been the underdog since he was introduced into the story. He hasn’t had much time to shine since it was relatively late into the story when he came in, and he’s handled himself well up to this point (which, like I said, is with maybe two missions left in the personal story for me). I feel like he’s doing the best he can, for being a scholar thrown (willingly, yes) into the position of Marshal for the combined armies of The Pact. I just think people are being too hard on him as a character. Sure, the voice acting can be iffy, but if that’s what annoys some people about him, I’d say that’s a rather trivial point to debate. Just turn off the sound and imagine the lines in Morgan Freeman’s voice, for all it matters. :P
I realize that that’s not even a reason most people give, but I have heard it said.
I’m just insulted that you think I was calling people irrational out of spite. :c I just feel that they’re overreacting to Trahearne, not calling them irrational folks in general. :c I’ve had a good time playing with the people in this game, much more so than any other MMO I’ve played thus far. The community is healthy and still gets along quite nicely! We all have our opinions, but that doesn’t keep me from getting to know someone in my guild or over map chat or something.
Sorry that I said anything. I just wanted to state my opinion. :c
“So far it seems that he’s just been the underdog since he was introduced into the story … [so] late into the story.” That’s the beginning of the problem. The problem was the way in which he was introduced, how he seizes control of the story which up until then was being directed by and for our character, the ridiculous heavy handed writing that makes him the leader of the pact even though he lacks any credentials for being chosen as the leader over our character who the story is supposed to be about. I could go on and on and on but really a good portion of the evidence was already adduced and it is not fault of ours that you refused or would unable to understand it despite there being 7 pages of it.
In order to understand a position you don’t have to believe in that position itself you just have to understand the argument which is being made, something that you have refused to do and therefore resorted to calling it “irrational” as a means to avoid having to meet it head on. But you can’t simply dodge addressing the issue just because you don’t want to put the time into reading the points that were being made.