.. OP’s post …
You seem to not grasp any idea of what an elementalist is.
Jack Of All Trades, Master Of None
If you don’t like it, go play another profession. I’m really tired of people like you on the forums.
I enjoy helping people learn to think critically, so that arguments can become constructive debates. Not everyone can be helped, but I like to think of everyone as having the potential to be a great thinker.
The phrase you bolded is a social agenda term. The proponent principle is communicated by another popular phrase – practice makes perfect. Any logistician will cringe at these because a logistician is keen about a Logic subtopic known as false logic. The primary examples of false logic are visible throughout our society – stereotyping, generalizing, profiling, industrial education, etc. The common mistake of these is an application of reasoning that has limited scope or unproven truth as if it were a universal truth. Often a logical argument will infer one or more facts that are not true as a result.
A Jack of all trades confers that every subject this phrase is applied to can exhibit nothing unlike Jack; that is to say, what happens to Jack happens to everyone no matter what. Master of none confers a few ideas: 1. That a master role is the goal, 2. That having no mastery is despicable, 3. That there is either mastery or no mastery, and 4. That this declares the boundaries of results for everyone. Linking the two phrases makes one phrase that promotes the idea that life is a pursuit of profession with two outcomes: mastery or failure.
By now you should have a good idea what societies have historically fostered this idea, making it a principle of their social policy, even. If your mind is drifting toward Asia, then you are doing well. Let me ask you something. How long do you think it would take to become a master at balancing a spoon on your nose? Years? Decades? It is a goofy question, but a critical thinker will realize that a valid argument was raised by having asked such a ridiculous question. Point 1: a profession is a collection of tasks. How many tasks makes a profession? I know, the question is rhetorical, but a critical thinker will know that another valid argument was raised. Point 2: a unique profession requires a unique experience. Is it possible to master life skills and master a job to pay for life? Ah, the wheels are starting to turn, no doubt. Point 3: everyone is necessarily a learner of multiple masteries, and must master more than one to be proficient enough to survive. Final question: Is a national economic policy based on the principle of one lifelong skill mastered by each person competitive enough in our global economy, such that fluctuations in demand will not put lives at risk? Ah, yes. I will leave you to think about that one.
Cheers! Oh, and, be good.