The threat of rallying puts pressure on the other team, to make a choice between going for a stomp, going to revive, or playing the field.
Without rallying, there are less repercussions of letting a teammate die. As it is now, you have to consider the repercussions of going for a stomp and letting your downed mate be left unprotected which can trigger a rally if he is finished before you defeat the previous. It may be beneficial to juggle between offensively pressuring someone downed, and reviving to keep them alive.If four people are fighting 2v2 and 1 goes down on both sides. The two standing members have to decide
A) fight each otherrevive C) stomp/attack downed D) Flee E) a combination of the other options.
Removing rally reduces the threat level. They can stomp your teammate, but the other person will still be downed.
As it is now, both were downed and your teammate has 10% health left in downed, you may say “Shoot gotta stomp/revive now before they get a rally”. If it was changed, the pressure is diminished and you’re allowed to care “less” about your teammate than you currently do. As there isn’t a threat of this 1v1 with 1 downed and 1 downed turning into 2v1 via rally.If anything just makes a dude more independent as a unit because I don’t have the threat of successfully supporting teammates on the same level as current.
The game doesn’t need less teamwork.Core difference, i’ll say it again.
Ressurect takes risk thought and strategy ALWAYS.
Rally can happen accidentally, does not always require risk.
In the situation you mention, there are still choices to be made without rally. It does not become suddenly meaningless to let your teammate die. Your teammate dieng is always bad….always. Rally might make certain situations more extreme (if our teammate geting stomped will rally the enemy team). but it is always bad.
There is plenty urgency without this added layer of annoyance. If you have a player down, and they have a player down…and its you vs another guy. Simple example.
You can
A) try to kill the enemy player who isnt downed if you think your stronger than them.
B ) Try to heal your teammate if your better at healing than harming the enemy.
C ) let him stomp your ally to stomp his ally
D ) Try to interrupt him from healing his ally to get attention towards you while your ally heals himself.
E ) Interrupt the enemy from downing your ally while throwing ranged damage at his ally, forcing him to make a decision.I could go on and on…and on. Plus each profession and spec handle this situation differently WITHOUT rally. So no, rally is just another variable that isnt fun and can happen without motive to ressurect. It doesnt limit you from options or change urgency…it just changes what those options are in the moment, but your priority stays the same…kill enemy, dont let him kill ally or self. That will always be the goal in the end.
Never said there were no repercussions but lettuce look at your own scenario
C) is basically saying “ah kitten it” and letting your teammate die, because you take out the other and just go for a 1v1. C) does happen in the rare situation that they didn’t qualify for rally.
A) currently present in rally system
B) Happens in current system…
D) Happens in current system… I call it Mr.Pistol Whip.
E) Happens in current system, only that pressure is heightened because him range shooting your ally can cause a rally. So you really don’t want that to happen, because otherwise you can just break it down to cause option C) and just not care.
The situation where you give a kitten about C) is because the 5 pt kill will mean GG.
Outside of that? Nope. I see warrior + engi. I’ve got a Ranger down. I already Know I can take the warrior on from a previous fight. So meh eat a kitten ranger cus im gonna kill this engi and then drop kick the warrior.
Current system? “I can’t just ignore this kitten warrior he’s about to stomp”.You say it isn’t fun, but it can often be exhilarating.
“Heres a fun thought that i garantee is true. If rally was not in the game on launch. And this whole time you’ve been playing with out it or any thought of it…always knowing ressurecting always takes a risk or decision to heal your teammate. Then one day i put up a post on the forums saying “why shouldnt it just rez all your teammates who are downed in a fight when i kill someone!” it would be met (even by people advocating for rally today) by a big NO!”
Change is usually met with resistance.
We’ve all played different games.
We know this change already.
What if’s mean little.
Not to mention that rally doesn’t currently revive everyone, you have to qualify for it. While the qualifications may be too lenient. They are a reality.
(edited by ensoriki.5789)
revive C) stomp/attack downed D) Flee E) a combination of the other options.