Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Best update ever? Please, explain why.
1) It’s a new map
2) It brings new Pve contend and PvP content, not that I like the boring idea of killing mobs but it should please both comunities.
3) For the first week or so PvErs will give us WvWers a bunch of free lootbags
4) It’s maybe a start in the right direction, less Pve and more Pvp content !!11!!
When you talk about WvW, you talk about PvE people most of the time. WvW is nothing like tPvP – 1) You are required to level your character first and acquire the gear, through PvE obviously; hence, it makes pretty much any WvW player a PvE player at the same time.
If you want to experience something in GW2 that requires skill, go and play real PvP, i.e. tPvP. Get a team, play tournaments, get better.
Don’t try to sell me the bullkitten that WvW is anything like real PvP, ‘cos it’s just a PvE community that goes WvW for sheer destruction, nothing else.
Just like someone else suggested here, you seem new to the idea of PvP. The hardcore PvP players tend to focus on tPvP + they despise anything that includes traditional PvE only players.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Best update ever? Please, explain why.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Well, Garambola may be right to some extent, nevertheless, a number in MMO games plays a vital role. What role?
1) Succesful and enjoyable WvW
2) Lots of guilds/people to team up with
3) Succesful PvE, i.e. Tequatl and Wurm events, also “exotic” world bosses done on daily basis
As with everything, there are also some drawbacks of large populations, e.g. queues on WvW, overflows at WBs etc. etc. Nevertheless, I do honestly believe that the advantages overwhelm the disadvantages, and I’m pretty sure lots of people would agree with me.
With regards to the most enjoyable EU servers, generally speaking, ( as understood above, advantages flowing from e.g. large population ), I’d recommend the following servers:
a) French speaking – Visunah Sq.
b) Spanish speaking – Baruch’s Bay
c) German speaking – Elona Reach
c) International – Desolation, Gandara, Aurora’s Glade
Best regards
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Seriously, that would be something that would make me come back to the game. Loads of new skills/builds – perfect!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Can I ask a mod to close this topic?
1) Too much hatred and poison here
2) Copy/paste of numerous similar topics
3) Unproductive
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
There is only one answer: NO.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Hey, kiddos. If you do not want capes, just don’t voice your opinion here. It’s not like, once introduced, they will be mandatory to wear.
Kids these days…
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Exactly like I thought. Patch 1 2 and 3 will, despite being called “big patches”, still be regular LS patches maybe even smaller considering that they don’t add any features.
What a shame :/
How is adding a whole new map small?
A whole new map full with new features no less.And what about the first patch that added two world bosses, both with completely new mechanics?
Unless anet comes up with a dozen maps and a few classes in EVERY patch, some people will never be content.
Funny you should say “EVERY patch” when something that big hasn’t happened since the day the game premiered. rofl
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Totally agree with the OP.
ANet, this is one of those times you have to listen to what we say.
You’ve done amazing job recently with the new Wurm and Marionette, but let’s hope this pick thing is just a misunderstanding!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Imagine an underwater capital for Largos – no other game could actually boast something that epic.
Largos, Tengu and Kodans – please!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
If for casual player, and by that I don’t mean those guys who claim you can earn 700 gold/day by having multiple accounts etc. etc., then there is one answer, which you haven’t mentioned:
SPEEDRUNS IN DUNGEONS.
The most casual, easy and pleasant way of earning money. Approx. 8-12 gold/hour.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
I’d ask for this? Can we actually see a ranger put in an arrow onto a string before firing it? It was like that in GW1, in GW2 it fires an arrow out of the blue.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
The first and the last thing to do about dailies is – 5 dailies max per account. You choose whichever 5 you want to do, the rest gets locked once you’ve done other 5.
You get a rewards chest once you’ve completed 5, but that doesn’t lock you out of getting achievement points for doing more than 5.
I clearly said what it should be like: once you do the 5, you are barred from doing the others. Getting all daily ap ( around 21 or so ) is a joke – people become just ignorant achievement hunters, which is something that should be prevented.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
LOL, I bought it for around 50 pounds prior to the game’s premiere and now, look at this:
http://www.amazon.com/Guild-Wars-2-Collectors-Edition-PC/dp/B0085UDEWI
Still, I think it’s one of the nicest CE of any game I’ve ever got.
Think about it! If you truly love the game, the price won’t matter that much!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
I agree. Open and instanced events would be a great idea. One for the masses, one for a co-ordinated team. Win/win.
Indeed!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Tbh, I just want more weapons.
And I’m pretty sure that GW2 will, at some point, reach the coolness and complexity level of GW1. That’s going to be the best MMO game ever, then.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Probably something to do with the daft argument of “splitting the playerbase” , when the entire game biult around splitting up the playerbase between servers, map zones, guilds etc etc.
Possibly, but it’s an MMO game after all, it’s supposed to please different tastes. Hence, having both of them is a must, in my opinion, and invalidates the argument of “splitting the playerbase”.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Congrats. I own 5 of those, but I bought them all. Couldn’t bother crafting them, tbh.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
They do work.
But still, I’d take half of your opinion as accurate.
Devs, give us more open raid content + closed raid content ( WoW-style ). It’d keep both groups satisfied and make this game’s end content truly outstanding. Hell, I’d prolly quit complaining myself, lol.
Yeah but I’d start complaining. lol
Haha, why would you?:P I mean, having both sides of the coin is not the worst of the ideas, especially if it would please those complaining atm and keep satisfied those that don’t complain atm.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Dude, there are people here on the forums who think that being “an achievement hound” is normal. I mean, I don’t think the general idea that the exact definition of a “no-life”, i.e. achievement hound, should be considered “normal” by any standards.
The first and the last thing to do about dailies is – 5 dailies max per account. You choose whichever 5 you want to do, the rest gets locked once you’ve done other 5.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
(edited by Corpus Christi.2057)
They do work.
But still, I’d take half of your opinion as accurate.
Devs, give us more open raid content + closed raid content ( WoW-style ). It’d keep both groups satisfied and make this game’s end content truly outstanding. Hell, I’d prolly quit complaining myself, lol.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
I truly fail to understand the idea of an “achievement hound”. These kind of people usually tend to ruin the game, tbh.
You mean they ruin the game for you. I’m pretty sure that if you took all the achievement hounds out of the game, you’d have a severely diminished population. I think that might ruin the game for you even more.
I fail to understand min/maxers and speed runners, but what you can you do.
I fail to understand min/maxers and speed runners, too, but the achievement hounds are often the reason why many guilds fall apart ( numerous threads on reddit, gw2 forums, where people said those 17k ap people didn’t want to participate in guild missions, help with dungeon runs etc. ’cos they had to do all dailies, LS and so on, and so on ).
That’s the sad truth: once you remove all those game-ruiners from the game, the community gets so tiny it’s almost impossilbe to play.
PS We should be able to do only 5 daily ap. Once we’ve done them, we can’t do the rest of the daily ap pool we choose from.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
(edited by Corpus Christi.2057)
That’s because these people fail to understand one thing: pets can be set to “passive” mode, which means they will not tank anything, just follow you wherever you go. This works perfectly fine.
Just don’t mind the idiots. Most of the gw2 community are idiots: both the people who don’t know kitten about ranger mechanics and the rangers who are too ignorant to set pets on “passive” mode.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
I truly fail to understand the idea of an “achievement hound”. These kind of people usually tend to ruin the game, tbh.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
The “reasons” for ending the Queensdale Champ Train are so bad I don’t even know what to say here… lol
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Well, I guess you are right, but I think it’s a nice beginning. Finally, a good update!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
It’s nice to know that we can still gather tons of people to kill this epic boss. Maybe this is the direction that ANet should take: give us some tougher perma content that would demand even more coordination. Something like this could keep more and more people in the game.
Thank you, ANet, for something more demanding finally.
And congrats to Desolation – this truly is a giant among the servers. And I’m saying this as a Gandara player.
http://pl.reddit.com/r/Guildwars2/comments/1w4ve9/desolation_gets_first_wurm_kill/
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
(edited by Corpus Christi.2057)
Oh look people complaining and arguing on the internet. Well let’s hope something comes of this, something more important than some catharsis.
Oh, look, people discussing the game on the FORUMS.
n. pl. fo·rums also fo·ra (fôr??, f?r??)
1.
a. The public square or marketplace of an ancient Roman city that was the assembly place for judicial activity and public business.
b. A public meeting place for open discussion.
c. A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas, such as a newspaper, a radio or television program, or a website.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Guys, calm down. 3 Months left. 3 final months for ANet to make their statement: we’re keeping the ramainder of the playerbase or letting them go to the incoming MMOs.
Patience is a virtue.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Gandara is one of the biggest European servers. The reason some of the areas may feel as if they were deserted is because… people quit playing this game. I’ve noticed that at many servers, tbh.
No wonder why, though…
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Desolation has the biggest pve population in EU more or less.
Baruch’s was the first EU server to reach the “very high” population. There’s no other data whatsoever that would state that this has been changed now in favour of Deso, tbh. But if you find it, let me know!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Not to cut down your spirits, but TTS did manage to kill the wurm. However the wurm glitched and crimson was stuck at 0%. The wurm was still up after the event ended as well. Luckily we were able to get a dev into the instance to inspect the glitch.
Not to cut your spirits, but the glitch means it hasn’t been done. But I get your anger – I would have been kittened, too.
Tequtal was done first in EU. Let’s do the same with the Wurm since it’s been patched after TTS’s failure!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Dude, 3 hours after the patch entered, servers like Desolation, FSP, Gandara were succesful.
Get ready for the Wurm! That’s something!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Desolation? Lol, try getting onto Baruch’s or Visunah ( servers with bigger pop and more guesters than any other server in EU )…
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Slain but not slain? ROFL. You people should stop posting this bullkitten until you do slay it, for real.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
The fact that most of these items ever existed is just blatantly a bug.
The existence of the LS may have been a bug, too.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Don’t worry, mate. Happily, this LS bullkitten is getting some cut pretty soon.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
No. And there can be no other answer.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
I’m waiting… for april.
And in April you will be waiting for May and in May you will be waiting for June and in June you will be waiting for July and the list goes on an on.
I’m still waiting for all those promises in 2013 that never came to pass.
The problem is GW2 is that’s pretty much all we do these days – wait for things that never come and keep buying into every lie that Anet feeds us.
Quite frankly I’m of the opinion – I may be done waiting VERY soon. The game simply isn’t delivering on anything it promised and there are a lot of other viable options for gaming these days and coming out in the near future.
I don’t think any person of sound reason would wait over 2 years for anything to happen in GW2 that would change the end-game content of this game. There are plenty of games on the horizon that will take even more people from GW2 unless there’s de facto something expansion-quality-wise coming out in April.
We shall see soon enough.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Well they did add in Php gear and some other things. Balance updates take a very long time to come out though i must say it was confusing what was coming out this update but its best for them to take time for these major updates.
Sure, like… 1.5 year? This game looks like beta phase with it’s horrible balancing…
The had one a few months ago….
Yes, and it ruined more than it fixed, so I think!
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Well they did add in Php gear and some other things. Balance updates take a very long time to come out though i must say it was confusing what was coming out this update but its best for them to take time for these major updates.
Sure, like… 1.5 year? This game looks like beta phase with it’s horrible balancing…
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Ranger. Got 4 of them – what an amazing, however bugged, class.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
There ought to be a statistic present in all other games, i.e. “life steal”. With any dmg you deal, you gain life points.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Zerker is being reworked. It will mostly like change pretty soon.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
I am amused by the constant comparisons to just one game, GW1, and the attempts to justify the glacial pace of actual new expansion content by pointing out all the things GW2 has to do that GW1 didn’t.
Compare it to a real MMO. Everquest 2 launched in 2005. It had underwater content, combat. Quite a lot of it actually. It had jumping and content that required it. 24 classes. Far more races. More dungeons, more quests, more overland area. Housing. Raids. Open instances. Open world bosses. Actual in-depth crafting. More graphics options. Flexible UI. Far more guild management tools. Mounts. World events. Seasonal Events. And with all of that, SOE has managed to release full boxed expansions on an average of once a year, and has expanded the “features” of that game with every single one of them.
That is what GW2 is going to have to do to have the longevity, in this genre, as the Everquest franchise has had, and continues to have. GW2 needs to step up to the plate to play in the big leagues.
In so many ways ANET has the potential to be a force in the MMO world for many years.. IF they take the changes they have made mechanics wise and then adapt and adopt what has been very successful for the industry as a whole as well.
Living World isn’t going to cut it. Not in the long run. It’s not new, only the pace is. I’ve done temporary “World Events” in Everquest 2 since it launched.. it is their name for it. It is something to do.. between new expansion content. Temporary content is no replacement for an expansions worth of permanent content, not there, and not here.
+1. At least, we can see that the devs realised the bi-weekly, poor quality-wise updates are not the way to go. So, I do still have some hope for this game. Otherwise, plenty of other games coming out in 2014-15 ( among them, EQ:N ).
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
Lol at people who think ascended is elite. Just lol
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
What’s the purpose of this thread?
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
It is sad to see how easily satsified the masses are. Truly.
This is a truly judgmental comment. What you’re saying is you’re better than the masses somehow, because you like something and other people like something else.
Indeed.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.
It is sad to see how easily satsified the masses are. Truly.
Three 80-lvl Rangers. Why? ‘Cos they’re that cool.