I’d figured Dragon Hunter came from Braham working more closely with his Ranger mother. She started teaching him how to use a bow and literally hunt thing, specifically the draconic quarry he’s oath-sworn to help you destroy. So Braham learned to hunt dragons for his crusader-like dedication to actively protect people and your character can be similarly focused.
My guardian is the daughter of a fisherman and he died killed by a quaggan.
He started teaching me how to use a fishing rod and literally fish thing, specifically the quaggan quarry my whole guild’s oath-sworn to help me destroy.
So my character’s learned to fish quaggan for her crusader-like dedication to actively protect fishermen and your character can be similarly focused.Quagganfisher were born.
Troll appart, naming a specialization from very specific storyline isn’t a good thing.
The braham’s story line doesn’t define my character, it define braham’s one.
If he wants to found the dragonhunter order/faction, I’ll help him to do so like I’ve helped Trahearn with the Pact but I’m not ok if it impacts my character’s so heavily.What annoys me the most for the dragonhunter name is the explaination from Jon Peters:
A couple notes on Dragonhunter. We went with this name because we felt it was evocative of the medieval witch hunters. Guardians consider themselves protectors of the innocent. Followers of their faith be it in honor, valor, etc. The origin of the dragonhunter is a more subtle nuanced version of this. Guardians fight for justice and the dragonhunter faction believes justice is the eradication of dragons and their minions. I understand this is a lot more high concept than Mesmer but at the end of the day we felt like we wanted to try and push a more mature theme here. I hope this helps explain our thinking. We had other generic names in mind but felt like it was important to have a mix of spec names that are generic fantasy, more Tyrian fantasy, and more high concept. This one falls more in the third category.
Thanks,
Jon
I’m ok if “Guardians fight for justice”, I’m not if that made me join the “dragonhunter faction (who) believes justice is the eradication of dragons and their minions”.
I want to fight for justice but dear Mr. Peters, you went too far when you set in stone why I am fighting.
It should be up to the player to chose which way his character follow.If I chose to follow the dragonhunter path, that should be my personal choice like when I chose to be a noble looking for my sister’s body.
I had to chose one of the different symbol of my dedication and I didn’t chose the one which fits to the fanatics’ approach of dragonhunter.This roleplay story I chose during my character’s creation didn’t affect my gameplay.
Choose whether I want to be a part of the dragonhunter’s faction or not shouldn’t affect my gameplay.
if you invent and popularize a style of fighting, you basically get to name it, and people who use it after you will have to call it whatever you decided it was
if you invent quagganfisher fighting, everyone who uses it after you, even if they do not fish quaggans will have to call it that
it happens in the real world like
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bak_Mei white eyebrow martial art, because the guy who started it was old. Does that mean every practioner of it is old now?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fut_Gar budda family, only buddists can use this martial art now?
fencing comes from the word defense, does that mean it can never be used offensively? is every body who fences now a defender?
assassins comes from hashish, a group of people who murdered enemies after getting high on cannabis.
so yeah, many martial arts/proffesions, etc are named whatever they are named, and people who follow it later use the same name regardless of what they use it for.
Somebody decided to name the style of fighting dragonhunter, and now IF you want to use it, you have to use the name they made up for it.