HoT Price Feedback + Base game included [merged]
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: eisberg.2379
so let me get this straight:
- you can’t compare it to WoW expansions, because WoW is P2P
- you can’t compare it to GW1 because those were standalone games.
- you can compare it to EOTN because that was an add on (?)
- you can’t compare it to Rift, because “nobody cares about Rift or plays it”while at the same time saying “what game kept the same population for 3 years, population slump is normal!”
This guy gets it. Some of the people here are just irrational. If you want to buy the game, I don’t think anyone is judging, just don’t argue that its worth the asking price based on what we know about it. If we are jousting with words, GW1 considers EotN to be an expansion and its utterly impossible to claim that HoT has more content than that. (Again all based on what we know so far)
cut this out because I didn’t want to inflate post size
For some reason it won’t show post name, this is a reply to Phoebe Ascension
Those professions from GW1 are by far more intricate. Lets be honest, traits/specs don’t make up for the fact that in GW1 handed you a ton of choices by skills. You had depth to the build system without having to be locked to an armor set by stats. (too much, yeah yeah I know insigs :P) The revenant is not a huge deal but it is at least good to have another profession. Furthermore, the mere addition of an extra elite spec in no way compares to how many additional skills were added in the GW1 expansions, including EotN with their PvE skills. (lets not forget that in 2, pve skills were trash while in EotN they were fun added bonus to play around with)
Also you are making the mistake of excusing the expansion for content that was added to the core of GW2. I hope I don’t need to repeat myself on how silly that sounds. You are buying the expansion, not giving Anet a donation for a job well done (if it even is that…). Others have the right to question the issue. The concept of Guild Wars has always been sub free. I probably would even be here if it was a sub so just because they didn’t require a sub does not mean Anet gets a pass on lack of content. The business model was defined clearly at the start. An expansion of equal price to the base game ideally should have equal content. This is not only reasonable to assume based on logic but historically the case given GW1. Even if you consider everything in HoT 100% (and honestly I can’t think of something I dislike to the point where I would discount it in value) it is lacking. You mention how a player should not devalue content they dislike. The reverse is also true. A player should also not put on a pedestal content they like. You really need to take a step back and look at it objectively.
I just want to highlight this again:
Anet have a gem store and a stream of revenue. Its probably not Riot Games level of profitability but the added content to the game is it is comes from that. HoT should be judged on its own, not based on some notion that we the player “owes” Anet for patching the game or making it sub free. If GW2 is your passion and you want it, by all means go for it. Anet still has me on good will they built up from GW1 but we should all be able to take a step back and look at it for what it is.
You cannot compare GW1’s games and the 1 expansion to GW2 because those games were not even MMOs to begin with, they were never even marketed as an MMO. GW1 was more like the Diablo series but with a graphical lobby, and nobody ever considers Diablo series as an MMO.
Also it is far from lacking in content, it is jammed packed with content, perhaps if you actually played the beta you might know this. Plus more content is going to be added to HoT over time.