No good player dies to the Ranger. I still havn’t lost a fight to one. Not even when I am playing my Ranger.
Quality troll sir. Go play tPvP.
sPvP is for the people who can’t be bothered to level, or can’t handle the full damage of WvW. There is nothing like fighting harder hitting players under the damage of siege, and still surviving.
If I can survive a Thieves burst in Glass Canon build, that does easily 50% more than they do in sPvP, while dodging cat shots, and treb shots, what makes you think a Ranger could ever kill me in sPvP?
I’ve never lost a single fight with a Ranger, nor an Engineer. I’ve only lost three fights against Necromancers. You see, I attend fight clubs virtually every other day, and spend hours at fight clubs on weekends.
Sir, may i remind you that in WvW, most glass cannon rangers are half dead when you encounter them?! Not to mention the fact that most rangers are actually playing the class quite horribly. Only recently, has the ranger community itself started to re-vitalize by refining gears and sharing tactics. With time, we will grow into a mighty foe.
As for your “uberness”, claiming to be pro, without evidence, is like claiming to own a ferrari without showing it to anyone. Post vid, then claim to be pro. If not, your skill is subject to your own ego. And most people aren’t sincere enough to say that they are about average.
I couldn’t agree more. Thanks for actually seeing the light. I’m an aggressive writer and people here tend to think I’m a troll but the fact is that you’re closer to the truth than they are.
I think it’s funny that people make all these claims about ranger but never show any proof. But the moment I try to apply logic and math to this profession, I get shot down.
And for everyone else: we’re not claiming all of the professions are exactly balanced equally such that every possible build has a chance versus every other build when played optimally. That’s just not true! Of course some professions have more potential for DPS than others given a set of boundary conditions. This much is obvious.
Rather, what I’m saying, and I don’t want to put words in anyone’s mouth, but I really believe that the DIFFERENCE between professions is smaller than mainstream thought as of March 13, 2013, makes it out to be.
I know for a fact there is more of a skill gap between average players and good players of ANY profession than there is from the POTENTIAL for damage from ranger when compared to, say, warrior.
The fact is, you’re more likely to notice less DPS coming out of a newer/mediocre player than the difference in DPS between a skilled warrior and a skilled ranger.
That’s just it, Xsorus has proven to be good with the Ranger, with videos. He then jumped on a Thief, and showed he could do ten times better on another class, and you guys laugh it off, and make excuses.
So why bother?
Please explain the math behind your “10x” better quote?
In his videos he struggles fighting three players with his Ranger, but in his Thief video he fights zergs with 20+ players in it, and living, while downing people. But even though he has videos of this, you guys make excuses because the proof isn’t enough.
I mean seriously.
I gave a video of a four man group, through the eyes of a Warrior killing 20-30 people, and you guys said, but, but, but, but……. I mean come on. You don’t want the truth, you want to BS.
You have never provided counter videos to the ones I’ve posted, ever.
Okay…anecdotal evidence doesn’t fly in the court of law, friend. Let me try to explain why.
A lot of thieves have it super easy in a large zerg because they can stealth and run away if they have to or just stealth to lose targets. No one, in a big battle, is going to explicitly target the assassin coming into and out of existence. That’s just a waste of time—and that’s the best thing thieves do for the team. They waste the opponent’s time.
Every profession has a role. You should open your eyes to things ranger can do well…I mean, by your logic, every profession needs to be able to kill 20+ players at once to be “balanced”. That doesn’t sound like a fun game to me, bro.
More excuses. Provide proof that the Ranger is fine in WvW. We’ve provided proof that the other classes are much better, with the exception of Engineer, and Necromancer.
The ball is in your court. You say others don’t provide proof, YET THEY DO, without ever providing proof yourself.
All the other classes provide much more to a WvW group than a Ranger, so what role does the Ranger serve, other classes in WvW do not do better?
80 Thief – 80 Warrior – 80 Guardian – 80 Ranger
80 Mesmer – 80 Necromancer