As the title says. I just killed the boss in “Into the Labyrinth” and all I have to do is speaking to Rox. But after the cut scene it teleports me right into the wall and I cant talk to Rox anymore.
Send Gm please or make unstuck command
Attachments:
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
Ppl suggesting not to play wvw to protest are wrong. You would play into Anets’ hands since they don’t want you to play WvW. They want to remove this because there is no profit and waste of money since they are to dumb to implement what the WvW community wants. kittenmit Anet hire a full time WvW dev already and not a part time staff which is mostly interested in pve
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
As in the title will there be a mastery reset?
Many of the WvW community thought the Pact Commander perk “Advanced Logistics” would also work in WvW. Actually it doesnt (as intended).
As a pure WvW player I dont have many available points for Central Tyria (13 to be precise) and feel like having my points wasted in Pact Commander.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
Since the last Guild Chat stream we know the new arena will be 75% the size of the OS arena. It is sure that this won’t be enough for the standard format of 20vs20 GvGs because “it feels pretty full” according to the game designer.
One thing I dont get is this quote from Collin
“We are looking into adding a bigger arena in the future outside guild halls in support of bigger battles.”
It is honourable that the devs are having the GvG community in mind but it’s still disappointing. Couldn’t you just make it like 50% bigger since one of the arenas is up in the air with plenty of space? This would prolly solve all the problems the GvG has atm and you wouldnt have to burden yourself with an extra arena.
Last concern is when do we actually get the new arena and will we get it with the same features of the arena which seem to be literally EVERYTHING the GvG community needs.
Not trying to blame anyone but we know that Anet likes to take their time to make features perfect but there are guilds and many WvW players which have a limit of waiting and with HoT and all the people who will come back it seems to be perfect to have everything done on HoT releaese and not MONTHS later.
I feel stupid at this point to still care so muchto write a thread about that after years of “hope”.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
you guys surprised? lol
If you watched their PAX interviews then you would know that Anet can’t even differentiate between WvW players and PvE/sPvP players because “the playerbase is enjoying every mode and there are no WvW-Only players”.
So how the kitten you expected Anet to determine what a hardcore/experienced WvW player is?
And since more and more HC players lose more and more faith or even lost it already there won’t be an uproar big enough to get Anets attention.
EAT IT. Take what you get. Expect less than nothing. That’s how you get through GW2without disappointment
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
“I was never a big PvPer”. Well… that is your whole problem I guess? If you can’t invest enough time into sPvP many strong classes can seem “OP”. Sure Mesmer got a bit strong but burning and necro? Nothing to quit the game for since burn builds are not really common.
And about the amulete part. Look above. You apparently dont invest enough time to understand the system around it.
The new system even gives more diversity because you dont have to pick a trait line because of the stats. You just chose the trait line now for the traits/utilities it brings.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
Just a random thought but have you ever considered the stability change as a part of the problem? Since stability never caused real big calculations in the past it is now working with stacks. So more calculations have to be made by the server.
Just would like to know you opinion about that because in large scale fights it can make a huge difference.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
btw. for the blob comment, more number’s of equally geared and leveled players should always have a high probability of winning an engagement. Again, its the reality of the situation.
You have clearly never played in an organized group.
I would agree with you if you talked about equal skilled players but
an equal geared blob should lose against a much better organized/“skilled” guild group.
Same goes for the small scale guild. Where is the point in running with 2 friends in ts if the system doesnt allow you to win against 3 pugs?
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
No. but the so called “pirate ship meta” will find more popularity. zergs/guilds will just range dmg each other and wont engage at all because its too easy now to strip stability.
The whiner/haters among us will shout “yea no more braindead melee train meta” but they actually haven’t understood how large scale fighting works at all.
Looks like gw2 large scale fights are getting less dynamic and more stale with a ridiculous amount of range pressure.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
I never thought what we were doing was balanced. a guild of 20 shouldn’t be able to steamroll a disorganized group of 60. it’s gratifying, and fun, but imbalanced. it should be more challenging. get off your high horse.
Where is the point of losing against pugs which have no organization and randomly pressing skills. This would kill the whole philosophy behind a guild/teamspeak raid.
Every organized guild should be able to shut down an disorganized group of 60 players.
Every organized guild should lose to an equal organized group of 60 players.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
This “zerg” gameplay is the reason why Gw2 is fun. If I wanted roamer fights I’d go play PvP. It’s a 80 man cap per side for a reason.
Outnumbered fights are possible! It’s just bad players that cannot adapt to their circumstances that qq about “the sea of red” (Was not referring to you as a bad player, Phantom). This is a change that bad players will profit from.
You guys do realize they’re making guardians useless compared to warriors?
Anet ruins another game mode that the GvG community have worked their kitten off to get where they are.
They’re throwing away the money, time and dedication the GvG community gave to their gamemode.
With. One. Change.
GvG is not a supported gamemode so considering it for balance is stupid.
Guild wars 2 is not built for the less than 100 people who want to GvG. Personally, if this completely kills GvG, all I can say is good. The new stability benefits skilled players and punishes bad players which given your complaints would be a lot of the so called GvG players.
I want to see a video of you beating blobs after that. With that change the fights will depend more on numbers than it was ever before. A blob will just rip off a guilds stability in a sec by the fact that they have just more CC.
Your comment just concentrates on hating the GvG community for a stupid reason. Prolly because you were a “true” GvG player back then in GW1.
You can’t deny the fact that the fluent game mechanics which most WvW players are enjoying are a courtesy of the mechanic behind stability.
So either the guardian will be dead in zerg fights because you can’t keep enough stability up against the massive amount of CC in a blob
OR
You will just see full guardians trains which are concentrating on keeping 25 stacks of stability to net get CC and steam roll everything.
Wouldn’t a party full of guardians be pointless since nobody is going to carrying CC?
Also Stability has always been a cheap powerful skill that benefited from very little counterplay.
1. Depends on how much stacks Stand Your Ground gives. I hope for Anet it’s 25 stacks.
2. It’s powerful but GW2 WvW benefits so much from it because it allows a fluent combat mechanic which most WvW players are enjoying. You and prolly most of the roamers not but still…
And you are talking about little counterplay? You just need 2 necros with corrupt boon and you can shut down every melee in a zerg fight. Do it against a Pug Commander and you shutdown a whole blob.
With the stab change you wont even be able to use corrupt boon because your stab stacks are getting ripped off in a sec by the huge amount of CC a blob has.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
This “zerg” gameplay is the reason why Gw2 is fun. If I wanted roamer fights I’d go play PvP. It’s a 80 man cap per side for a reason.
Outnumbered fights are possible! It’s just bad players that cannot adapt to their circumstances that qq about “the sea of red” (Was not referring to you as a bad player, Phantom). This is a change that bad players will profit from.
You guys do realize they’re making guardians useless compared to warriors?
Anet ruins another game mode that the GvG community have worked their kitten off to get where they are.
They’re throwing away the money, time and dedication the GvG community gave to their gamemode.
With. One. Change.
GvG is not a supported gamemode so considering it for balance is stupid.
Guild wars 2 is not built for the less than 100 people who want to GvG. Personally, if this completely kills GvG, all I can say is good. The new stability benefits skilled players and punishes bad players which given your complaints would be a lot of the so called GvG players.
I want to see a video of you beating blobs after that. With that change the fights will depend more on numbers than it was ever before. A blob will just rip off a guilds stability in a sec by the fact that they have just more CC.
Your comment just concentrates on hating the GvG community for a stupid reason. Prolly because you were a “true” GvG player back then in GW1.
You can’t deny the fact that the fluent game mechanics which most WvW players are enjoying are a courtesy of the mechanic behind stability.
So either the guardian will be dead in zerg fights because you can’t keep enough stability up against the massive amount of CC in a blob
OR
You will just see full guardians trains which are concentrating on keeping 25 stacks of stability to net get CC and steam roll everything.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
Try to look at it from the eyes of a beginner guys.
The NPCs award points, and give you a buff. Who wouldn’t want that?
It takes a higher level of understanding of the both the map and conquest mechanics to get that securing mid is important.
How would you guys suggest we go about teaching this to players?
That is the reason so many thing fail in gw2 if you want to go competetive/“hardcore” .
The devs always have to/want to consider new players in every aspect of the game. But we are talking about ranked. “RANKED” You shouldnt do ranked queues if you are a noob
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
kitten YES. kitten the siege wars, kitten you ppt blobs who are too scared of fighting. kittening come at me brah. let the kittening karma train with fully upgraded keeps begin! >:)
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
why do you want a real armor piece with stats? Doesn’t make sense at all since it’s a pvp skin which just can be obtained in pvp where armor stats are irrelevant.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
Used to farm many EU T1 pug blobs with my former guild which drop a kittenton of heavy loot bags. Additionally you get a few rares and if you are lucky 1-2 exotic pieces. So we made like 10g-15g with ease.
Playing now for another guild and I make at the very most 5g a day because we’re fighting mostly guilds in silver league.
So yea it depends on your play style (roaming,zerg busting with guild, playing in pugzerg, etc.) AND ON YOUR PROFESSION! playing guardian. 111111111
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
If you think there’s some kind of a gentleman’s pact going on in WvW then you are in for a disappointment.
Today on the Gunnars map it has been proved that there is at least some kind of gentleman’s agreement. Guilds like TUP and HoB haven’t interfered any guild fight and respected the joy of a challenging fight.
Thanks HoB and TUP for the fights and guilds like VcY, oO, Mya for not interfering.
Best regards.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
You better stop playing David and Goliath and just run away when you see us instead
of harassing us while we usually try to ignore small scale roamer like you.
You deserved it. Though I have to say gj. You got our attention.
Ty for the fight Gd, even if we had more, i hope you had fun too!
Numbers doesn’t matter as long as both sides stand an equal chance of winning and have fun. Fights were intenseand last for many minutes. Think that is what we all are looking for.
Have fun in silver league. gl/hf etc
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
This are great news for the GvG-Community! Imo we slowly but surely go through a second adolescence.
One thing that worrying me is that there will be “just” one arena. Is the arena designed for 2 guilds fighting each other or for more guilds? Problem I see is coming that there are often multiple GvGs on one day even with the best organization.
Would be nice if you implement ~3 arenas so we can really replace the old GvG spots in all 3 bl with the upcoming jp arena.
Everything else like ratings/organization/etc can be/already has been made by the community. So the only thing which the GvG-community is lacking is “just” a proper place.
Thank you again for the nice news. Really much appreciate it!
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
I say we disable PvE for a day and see how that community responds…
LOVE this idea….wanna see real rage?? Take PvE down for 8 hours…see how mad those guys get….
That is why they are obviously neglecting the WvW community and just accept our rage.
Just reminds me of the PaX interview. “Will armor sets be adjusted for charrs?” Response “No. There is a priority for other classes because Charr are played by lesssr people… soo…GTFO”
It’s the same with WvW and PvE. They are thinking in terms of a money making company and just hazard the consequences.
Have you ever seen the 120+ Zerg at the invasions and Tequila Dragon? trust me they don’t want to mess with them.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
One thing I forgot to say. At least they are really fast at fixing their sloppy work. It just takes Anet approximately 9 hours to fix the messed up matchup.
Tequatle patch = WvW lagged 1 day before the patch till 1 day after the patch.
Last WvW patch = you didn’t test the ram mastery properly so Iron Hide was abusable for a whole night.
Big Twilight (PvE) and minor WvW patch = WvW matchups are messed up completely and is still under maintenance. How’s that possible?
I feel like you are taking all the capacity/recources from the servers and from the WvW team to put it all into the PvE content.
What do we have to expect next time when you implement the next big balance patch? (when will it be btw? maybe im uninformed but I expected it today)
Why can’t you (for at least one time) ensure a professional made patch carried out with the minimum of inconvenience. I would be glad about hat.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
I’d just like to make a note of one thing that I think people aren’t considering when they transfer to stacked worlds. You will not, repeat will not, be able to receive the reward based on overall world place in the league, unless you achieve the meta achievement for the season. If you aren’t able to get into WvW much, you won’t get the rewards. So it is absolutely taking a risk to transfer to a world that has a large WvW population.
If you hint at massive queues due stacking on one tier you are so horribly wrong.
I’ve played on t1 servers in EU and NA. And the queue is not that long like it is used to be at the release of GW2. Back in the days I would agree with you (2-4 hours queue partially) but nowadays I doubt the queue will stop anyone to get the achievements.
Nevertheless your achievement is so cheap. Everyone who has kept one single eye at the development of GW2 knows that you build up the game mainly for the casually playing people.
So I guess the wvw meta achievement will be an advanced version of the normal daily achievements to lure the more pve people into WvW.
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
can SOR and BG stack more people for EU-time, we need more fights, kills and baggys. so 100-200 guys more would be great.
Yeah im sure BG and SOR will get right on that. I mean rumor has it BG is getting Scnd and VII for EU. I’m sure GD would love to meet Scnd once again lol
Second Law has no intentions to move to NA, especially not as coverage monkeys for the PPT game.
If we ever move to NA, it will be to fight some specific guilds.
Please let this rumour die.
What? We are not converage monkeys QQ
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
The thought was good but firstly the buff is to strong. Just give us for every orb buff mf/gf/etc. That is something people would really like to fight for.
I don’t want to fight for something so the opponent server don’t have it. I want to fight for a really exclusive reward.
2nd the camps/circles or what ever are way too close. I hoped that I could roam there but unfortunately it escalated in mindless zerging. I wasn’t able to fight there with a group of 5+ people. Maybe it’s a problem of the tier I am.
I wish the camps would be really wide spread so it’s hard for every server to hold 3 camps.
3rd thing. imho it’s completely fail that you don’t have to hold a camp to keep the bloodlust buff. Once you got it it will just dissapear if another server got the buff. It should dissapear instantly when you have less than 3 camps. Same goes for 5 neutralized camps. 5 neutralized camps = 0 bloodlust buffs for any server.
Sry for sometimes not using the right terms and for things which already have been addressed. Wasn’t able to read through the whole pages. :P
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
Just ignore the BUKA guy. He is one of the many self-appointed PvP pro’s who feel superior when they hunt upscaled/player with zerg builds from the tail of a zerg while they are using cookie cutter builds (stunlock warriors/prismatic understanding mesmer/Perplexity engis/ etc.).
b2t it’s like a smash in the face for the…. well… let’s call it “the community which is organizing ingame wvw events”.
We have built up a very strong, pretty big and growing community with a huge potencial. We created on ourown new incentives and long term goals for specific guilds which Anet haven’t been able to do for us for like a year.
I would be careful with the statement that we will be losing all the guilds from
“the community which is organizing ingame wvw events” up to now.
I’m sure the “ingame wvw events” will continue because of the hell of a fun.
But they will never be as competetive as they use to be because there will be always a bad aftertaste when you see you won with a +50/100/150 all stat buff. Not just because of the buff but well…it’s actually a combat changing advantage.
Lastly, I would like to personally thank MartyPartys and Ogre who get this all going.
Let’s see how it developes.
oh man…it’s so stupid to avoid one single and simple word. Don’t even know why I did that.
P.S. I bet this thread will be getting moved to Community Corner > Linksville. Seeya there. :P
Clint B E Eastwood – Guardian
Callous Philosophy [LaG]
† Good Old Days [GD]
