~Sincerely, Scissors
~Sincerely, Scissors
"No Subscription" is not a FAVOR
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
Having a sub fee is no guarantee all gemstore services will become free.
Just look at wow. You pay for the base game, the expansion AND a sub fee.
And you still have to pay real cash for certain services and cosmetics in their battle.net shop.
Pets – 10$
mounts – 20-25$
Helmets – 12$
lvl 90 boost – 50$
faction change – 25$
Appearance change – 15$
character transfer – 20$
race change – 20$
name change – 8$
Those prices are absolutely absurd considering how much money it costs just to be able play the game at all. I’d rather have the Guild Wars 2 model. Paying for some extra services but no sub fee.
~Sincerely, Scissors
I think I will leave this clip of Shiro in action. The Guild Wars Factions opening cinematic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtP5AkrCNUIHe looks like some anime stereotype – angry long haired dude in trenchcoat with swords and crazy powers.
I’m glad that GW2 moved away from asian style.
And it was awesome.
~Sincerely, Scissors
To everyone else that’s commenting as such in this thread, “sexy” is subjective. One person may find super long hair attractive while another person may not, so to definitively say female human & norn toons don’t have bald options because “it’s not sexy” is fairly sexist, but I digress.
The point isn’t that it’s subjective. Subjectivity is irrelevant in that that Anet as power over what gets added in the game and the vast majority of males(and probably females players too) would likely play with female characters with hair, regardless of the length. The aversion for baldness being “sexist” is also presumptive, irrelevant, and insulting to males or females, given that character gender is not tied to a player’s gender IRL and/or social standing.
^this
~Sincerely, Scissors
Those facebook ads to it all the time. Stealing images from other games.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Well the Ventari healer, and the fact healers might be more required in HoT does indeed sound good. I remain skeptical about it though, we will see how it turns out.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Until the game gets dedicated healers and tanks, and actually makes playing them worth while, that comment from the POI has no meaning.
Not true at all.
Ok so playing as a healer or tank is viable then?
Not going to discuss this with you until you watch the video, which you obviously haven’t.
I did watch it. They say they blended everything together so you are not locked into a role, and are free to swap roles as you choose.
What ‘roles’? There is only one role: DPS.
The only other roles are Support and Control, which aren’t really indepedent roles. It’s just something a DPS does on the side. A guardian can focus almost completely on damage, and still pump out dozens of boons to everyone around them. Several classes can focus almost completely on damage while still having access to great crowd control.That’s what I’m getting at. I totally get anet not wanting us locked into dedicated roles, but that doesn’t mean multiple roles shouldn’t exist. Which they don’t atm.
You may have watched the video, but you sure didn’t hear what they were saying.
Start at the 5 minute mark and listen carefully.
Yeah I’m going to stop here.
If you just keep dismissing everything I say and keep claiming I just didn’t watch the video or actually listen to it, this isn’t going anywhere.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Until the game gets dedicated healers and tanks, and actually makes playing them worth while, that comment from the POI has no meaning.
Not true at all.
Ok so playing as a healer or tank is viable then?
Not going to discuss this with you until you watch the video, which you obviously haven’t.
I did watch it. They say they blended everything together so you are not locked into a role, and are free to swap roles as you choose.
What ‘roles’? There is only one role: DPS.
The only other roles are Support and Control, which aren’t really indepedent roles. It’s just something a DPS does on the side. A guardian can focus almost completely on damage, and still pump out dozens of boons to everyone around them. Several classes can focus almost completely on damage while still having access to great crowd control.
That’s what I’m getting at. I totally get anet not wanting us locked into dedicated roles, but that doesn’t mean multiple roles shouldn’t exist. Which they don’t atm.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Until the game gets dedicated healers and tanks, and actually makes playing them worth while, that comment from the POI has no meaning.
Not true at all.
Ok so playing as a healer or tank is viable then?
~Sincerely, Scissors
Until the game gets dedicated healers and tanks, and actually makes playing them worth while, that comment from the POI has no meaning.
~Sincerely, Scissors
I find it interesting that many of the folks here apparently siding with the OP are condoning and encouraging the very same behavior they claim to be reporting.
There is a difference between being a kitten to an innocent player who just wanted to play an event, and being a kitten to a kitten.
If he just asked normally I would back away. I wouldn’t have a problem with someone wanting me to back off so he can do things his way, I have a problem with people insulting me for no reason, and if I can strike back at them without risking a ban I will.
~Sincerely, Scissors
thats what a LIVING world is, i didnt get to experience the fall of rome in real life but the italian government has repeatedly ignored my letters suggesting that they invade europe
lol
~Sincerely, Scissors
“oh you want the event to fail and be belligerent about it … no problem”
/guild hey gang! those of you with tags wp to [waypoint] and turn them on
“Sorry but everytime you shout at me all I hear is: “complete the event!”."
~Sincerely, Scissors
When failing content is more rewarding than completing it. There is a design problem.
That being said, if I’m just playing the game normally and someone tells me to F off. I will just report/block him, and complete the event for good measure.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Because it’s not sexy
~Sincerely, Scissors
So.. gw2 is getting the trinity?
~Sincerely, Scissors
Asgeir Dragonrender.
Fights a dragon possibly the size of a small mountain, but no kittens given. Punches out a tooth the size of a truck anyway. Now that’s a bada§§
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
I don’t really like it either but whatever. You only spend a few seconds in the select screen anyway. It’s hardly a big deal.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Agreed. Norn women are much, much better looking than humans for sure.
Depends on what you are into.
I’m not really into body builder woman almost twice my size with a heavy voice lol.
For me humans are far superior in every way.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Everything is too weak at this point. It’s like hitting enemies with a wet towel.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
The Engineer’s rifle is neither good nor a rifle. It uses the rifle skin, but it’s a horrible mishmash of junk that has no idea what it wants to be or do. Three of five Engineer Rifle skills are gap-openers/control skills to help the thing keep its distance…then the autoattack is a weak Power attack and its big-damage skill is a point-blank Condition attack?
What. The. Actual. Gahkitten . Hell.
It’s a complete disgrace, and it’s also not a rifle. Now, it’s cool if the PvP guys have made the weapon class work on the character, but the Engineer rifle honestly feels, to me, like it’s more akin to what staff is for most everyone who uses staff – a collection of loosely related gimmicks tied together into a weapon which is described as “produces whatever we feel like because magic”, except in this case it’s not magic, it’s gadgets. That’s great for Engineers, which are a gadgety class, and I understand why the Engineer’s rifle is a whacky gadget-stick instead of a proper rifle…
But that doesn’t make it a rifle. Or good. Not when the big-punch skill on the gahkitten thing is completely 100% counter to every non-AA skill the thing has.
~Sincerely, Scissors
So much is account wide (currencies, masteries, WvW rank, skins, achievements, guilds, titles and more). Very alt-friendly.
As opposed to WoW where almost everything, even your darn friendlist (I mean seriously??) is character bound.
I keep this particular opinion to myself since I’m in a minority but all this account binding kittens me to tears. I like to play my characters and I find there’s not really a lot in the way of individual character progression. Besides leveling, of course. I’m not going to go through the list because there are shades in each feature but I don’t want to see to much more.
Progressing everything seperately for every character might be fun 2, 3 or 4 times. But not 20+ times.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Here you go
Wow! What did you stand in front of in order to be able to cut them out so well? Is there a makeshift green-screen somewhere? :P
Back then I used a trick in the HoM to get the camera really close. But nowadays I just lower the FOV slider to get the camera close enough.
~Sincerely, Scissors
As an altoholic, I love this game.
So much is account wide (currencies, masteries, WvW rank, skins, achievements, guilds, titles and more). Very alt-friendly.
As opposed to WoW where almost everything, even your darn friendlist (I mean seriously??) is character bound.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
Can’t play until I get home from work, but the way I’ve heard it the Rev staff is incredibly weak. Absolutely pitiful damage and somewhat unimpressive healing, which is a shame for the game’s first ‘heal your friends with this!’ weapon.
That’s what beta’s are for….
The current performance of the revenant doesn’t mean a thing.
~Sincerely, Scissors
tragic comedy at it’s finest
as i said wait till monday/tuesday. The real comedy will Start there <3
“where teh hell is mah stuf omg game broke!1!”
~Sincerely, Scissors
Can’t you mail it to a friend, then let him/her mail it back to you on your main?
Probably won’t work but you can at least try :PMail is disabled on beta characters.
shame, oh well :P
~Sincerely, Scissors
Can’t you mail it to a friend, then let him/her mail it back to you on your main?
Probably won’t work but you can at least try :P
~Sincerely, Scissors
He is just one of those pirates wearing an eye patch to look cool. Not because he actually needs it.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Only human beta characters today?
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
Because human master race.
Jk. As Jaxom already stated: In this beta you aren’t testing how the Revenant looks, but how it plays.
~Sincerely, Scissors
No thanks, I like my longbow the way it is tank you.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
killing the dream~
also if thief does get rifle, expect it to lose its stealth skills (to be replaced by the elite mastery’s skills)
Interesting, was that datamined as well?
~Sincerely, Scissors
If people are otherwise carelessly throwing out or destroying items from inventory, it’s their own fault.
If something so insignificant bothers you so much, that’s your own problem.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
It’s like playing paintball. You are shooting but bullets are with pain only. The same goes with fighting in gw2. You swing weapons but not hitting really, at the end wins the one who makes his opponent exhausted to defeat.
Some mobs have downed state and some mobs don’t, it doesn’t mean they are dead. They respawn in the same spots after some time, just like respawns in pvp.
Attachments:
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
that would require new animations (as far as melee staff is concerned ) new mechanics
lots of workFor a 50 dollar expansion I expect nothing less.
I think it’s not my quote
fixed
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
that would require new animations (as far as melee staff is concerned ) new mechanics
lots of work
For a 50 dollar expansion I expect nothing less.
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
Always been there.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
‘Not my cup of tea’ is different from ‘not even tangentially related to the base class’.
threadbare hopes
That description better fits a crowd seeing a rifle in what is obviously a stick and goes to incredible mental gymnastics in an attempt to justify why a thief can’t wear a melee staff and why no one wants it.
It has nothing to do with Thievery
90% a thief does has nothing to do with thievery. Except for the profession name and the Steal mechanic, it’s does everything an assassin does. Thief seems far more profficient in killing than it is in stealing.
Melee staff isn’t even cool
Subjective.
I don’t mind wether it’s a staff or rifle. I like both.
I just think it’s a staff because we clearly see a thief with a staff skin that is already in the game files.
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
In the image the rifle clearly has all of those; stock, barrel, trigger and muzzle. Its even got a strap.
The Barrel is obvious. The muzzle is partially off the image. The stock and trigger are hard to see just due to the blurring effect in the lower left of the image.
I’ve included an annotated image for those who don’t see it.
Thief isn’t getting rifle because the Revenant is getting it.
Genius!
~Sincerely, Scissors
I noticed that too.
And not only that, but the lighting seems to be different as well.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Female chars need heavy armors like from Dragon Age, no skimpy & awesome as kitten.
While some armors in Dragon Age are good, there are a lot of kittenty ones as well.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
Class colors are used in the background are reminiscent of theifs current trait lines backgrounds
and yet a blugeoning weapon matches a stealth class?
Yes it does. Ninja’s used bo staffs (among other weapons). And they practically invented stealth.
the bo staff was a weapon of training, not really used much by successful ninjas in the field.
It was used as a weapon as well.
(or in the case of the katana, something that 80% of japan carried around. it was still a weapon that could kill in a single hit though, unlike bo staff)
There are martial artists who can disable or even kill you with their bare hands in many different ways. I’m sure a ninja can do quite some damage with a long stick. A true martial artist can turn everything into a deadly weapon, wether it’s a razor sharp sword or a paper clip.
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
Seems fine to me
Those are awesome, how did you make them/have them made?
The pictures, not the armors. I can easily tell the armors lol.
Thanks! I Made them myself.
Got lots of them on my deviantart page.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
Class colors are used in the background are reminiscent of theifs current trait lines backgrounds
and yet a blugeoning weapon matches a stealth class?
Yes it does. Ninja’s used bo staffs (among other weapons). And they practically invented stealth.
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
How do you know the character in picture is not a staff wielding druid? Is the medium armor not druidic enough or the quiver? Please quote the source of your finding.
What class the character in the picture is, is completely irrelevant (assuming you are talking about the screenshot). The skin in that picture is still the same as the skin in that painting. And the character in that painting is a thief.
Ergo thief gets staff.
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
In the image the rifle clearly has all of those; stock, barrel, trigger and muzzle. Its even got a strap.
The Barrel is obvious. The muzzle is partially off the image. The stock and trigger are hard to see just due to the blurring effect in the lower left of the image.
I’ve included an annotated image for those who don’t see it.
I really don’t see it sorry. The muzzle is just some ornamentation on the staff. The strap is just a painting effect, this painting is filled with similair swirls and lines.
That being said, I would still be happy if thief got a rifle after all. But if that thing in the painting is a rifle then I’m the president of the united states.
EDIT: Besides, the skin is already in the game files anyway. You can preview it, and it’s a staff. It’s the EXACT same skin, look at the ornamentations, rings and markings on it. It also has the metal caps at the end which you think are muzzles. It even has some small ribbons hanging from it which could be the strap you are seeing.
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)
What armor is the middle one, Windu?
Phalanx armor with Human T3 shoulders and gloves.
~Sincerely, Scissors
Ranger gets staff, thief gets rifle
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: Windu The Forbidden One.6045
That looks to me like a Rifle.
Ok to settle this once and for all, look at those 2 pictures, if you still see a rifle, a spear or wathever else than a staff, you’re blind and I feel sorry for you.
Or you’re just a troll.
And the preview show the staff in game.
Yeah I don’t get how people can possibly see a rifle in what is quite obviously just a stick.
There is no stock, barrel, muzzle, trigger or any sort of mechanism on that entire stick. How could it possibly be a rifle.
~Sincerely, Scissors
In terms if military strength:
1 – Charr.
-Huge numbers
-Tanks
-Helicopters
-Airships
-Artillery
2 – Asura.
-Golems (lots of em)
-many magic users
-Lazorz!
-lots of other powerful technology (force fields, teleporters, etc)
3 – Humans.
-Numbers (not as much as the charr but still quite a lot).
-Many magic users
-Clockwork robots
4 – Sylvari
-Many magic users (even non magic sylvari seem to have some magical abilities, such as racials)
5 – Norn
Last place since they basically have no army.
Just my 2 cents
~Sincerely, Scissors
(edited by Windu The Forbidden One.6045)