Showing Highly Rated Posts By Dayra.7405:

After 20 months of WvWing, What did you learn

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

1. coverage wins —--> blackgate
2. “we don’t ppt” attitude doom a server —- > sor

Yes, and there are further examples as well.
Furthermore:

3. repeatedly loosing due to coverage leads to an “we don’t ppt” attitude.

As a consequence of these 3: 24/7 coverage wars destroys WvW-servers one after the other.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Why can't ArenaNet do this!

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

@Ascii Looks like you did not understood the strength of this API release.
This API the BEST ANet was able to do for the community and they did it!
Millenium.org (and others) can show it’s creativity, and I guess they earn money with this page. The millions of clicks the GW WvWler give them, earns them advertisement money. This way they are happy to be the best WvW site,

And the advatage for ANet is: they do not have to waste developer time in it to make it nicer. They can focus on the core.

If I understood the API correctly also “The Dragon Timer” http://guildwarstemple.com/dragontimer/events.php?serverKey=404&langKey=de and others can now use tha API to update their game infos for us.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

New matchup system (official info)

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

“If at that point our simulation is still generating bad match-ups we can absolutely look at lowering the range.”

So if the server come closer in rating, this can and likely will be countered lowering the range.

When Glicko-2 will actually work after a while the current artificial distances between ratings based on the tier boundaries will be replaced by a distance that is based on performance in the matches. An adequate range should therefore have it easier than currently to avoid blow-outs.

Currently they cannot use a reduced range, the range MUST go over match boundaries to recover from the current situation. (After 9 month of moving up rating points from bottom to the top, all match boundaries are nearly impassable far away.)

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

EOTM - the Death bringer

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

@romek: we all know now, that something happens in WvW that let you hate it now.
But your description fits whole gw2, it’s designed to feel pro for hitting 1, and every added boss event increases this. Second why do you have Elona in your signature? Servers like Elona do not exist outside WvW anymore and you stopped playing WvW. What let you keep the name of a WvW team in your signature, if you hate wvw? Elona doesn’t exist in PvE, EotM nor in sPvP.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

We need more gold rewards in WVW

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

I keep asking myself: “Why do upgrades even cost silver/gold?”

Gold Sinks.

To let trolls think about the costs of trolling or do you want merchants in every wood-keep or hired in the middle of a siege as someone needs to repair his armor?

No costs are bad. Only costs isn’t very good. Costs as investment for possible later rewards would be best.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

EotM is awesome

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

If the WvW players like what they did they tell them, if they do not they tell them and they remove those elements from the testing grounds.

Hm. If you ask 10 WvW-player what they want you get 15 incompatible opinions, including such stupid – but very popular 3 years ago – requests like new BLs with longer walk-ways. If you use EotM as the test-ground for 4hour matches with dynamic number of maps, then it’s time that this makes it into WvW. The voting is quite clear: EotM is played, WvW is dead.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

This game is pay to win, Slightly.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

And the fact is that i could spend $100 and completely skip my grind for ascended.

Yes, you can spend money to shorten your play.time, but is this a win for you?
If you say yes, then I wonder why you waste time with gaming at all
SImply don’t play MMO’s that costs neither money. nor time, a double win for you.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

To Those Who Think They Want A Megaserver

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Megaservers for WvW will do nothing to fix the actual problems plagueing WvW.

I do NOT agree. Especially for coverage, emptiness and imbalance mega-server-technology (or more precise: demand driven map-capacity and grouping of alliances into sides) can do a lot.

  • demand driven map-capacity: The coverage problem is mainly one of to much map (and therefore objectives and score) for to few players. In a typical off-time situation there is e.g. 50vs20 or 25vs10 or 20vs5 … (ignoring the 3rd side for simplicity) on 4 maps results in scores of 500+:200- i.e. a score-difference of 300+ per tick. But even 50vs20 can easily fit on 1 map, e.g. EB which limits the available score to 260 and the score-difference will be even smaller. This of course also helps vs emptiness, instead of jumping around on 4 maps, they can fight on 1. So a simple freeze and shut-down of all borderlands outside prime-time (2-4 hours day, maybe 8 on weekends) would already help a lot.
  • grouping of alliances into sides Imbalance of EotM is true, but only shows how bad ANet’s current grouping strategy is. This could be done much better, especially when active population over the last rounds is counted (as it is done now for the WvW population calculation). In fact it’s a variant of a well known optimization problem for which many good approximations exist.

If both methods are combined intelligently, coverage, imbalance and emptiness would not be noticable any longer.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Season 2 Idea For Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

BG wasn’t always the #1 server…

We came together as a community in order to get to where we are at right now. Everyone has the chance to do the same thing, it’s all a matter of how bad your server wants it.

#Believegate2013

I think, it doesn’t matter who is No 1, if No 1 only means: now – native or transfered – at the server with the largest force in off-time.

Fight for a more meaningful system and get No 1 there!

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Viznuah Square vs Elona Reach vs SFR

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Points, yeah you need some more of them, right?
We should invent T0 for Vizu alone,
(or add you blacktide and arbor for point gathering)
the Deso SFR and Elona can have a nice match in T1

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Server transfer costs don't make sense

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

But it doesnt really matter, of course Anet will keep the transfer cost. Only WvWers suffer it so its free money for little to no effort for Anet. I cant imagine any sane Anet boss would ever agree to remove it or reduce costs.

I am not so sure of that.

  • ANet was very lazy about introducing transfer costs at the beginning, their development was speed-up by massive player-wish in the forum, after we had some cases (e.g. Blacktide in EU) of massive movement of people to a low-rank server, crushing it’s slow way up, crashing after some weeks at the top, being crushed on it’s slow way down.
  • massive player protest against free transfers to specific servers before season 2. (In EU these transfers turned Gandara from a bad silver-league server into a dominant silver-league winner, that’s still middle-gold due to that free-transfers.)

Of course, both where problematic at that time, as we had some balance that got disturbed.

But now transfer costs only preserve imbalance, still a lot of people here want this preservation of imbalance. Do they want to keep the few that still follow them and fear that they will loose them as well? Do they fear they loose their dominant position? I don’t know.

I think transfer-costs were good when we had some balance. But currently, where we don’t have any balance, a total mixup by free transfer would be better.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Solution to fix the population imbalance

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Suggested Gold League:
BG+IOJ vs. JQ+DR vs. TC+SI
SOS+DB vs. FA+CD vs. YB+MAG

Lol T1 does not need a merge, T1 need a fence
Suggested Gold League:
BG vs. JQ vs. TC

Everything else into 6 (unlikly 9) server of Silver with mergers for man-power balance (only ANet can get the numbers for a good grouping)

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Matchmaking Post-Season 1?

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

There will not be another season this calendar year. The matchmaking post-season will be back to the system before, with some possible tweaks, but it will be essentially the same system.

Hopefully you tweak the random system!
- The dice should not be uniform distributed! (Normal to fit Glicko, or Gaussian, because it is simple), matches far away from your current position should be possible but definitely not as likely as matches at your position.
- The max-range of servers that could meet was much to large the last time (around 4 times the deviation+c in the worst case), I think no server should be able to roll up/down beyond the ranking of a server more than 2 places away would be a better restriction, than a deviation based.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

World Linking 8/26/2016

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

There is and will never be balance with server anymore. Much to many people have accounts distributed over multiple server or pay 500 gems transfer with left and play where the grass is greenest due to heavy bag rain.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

WvW achievements without Season

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

What else weapon skins?

Or why did so many people do the season achievements such that ANet is believing that it was a success?

Competitive achievements are a different story than check-mark achievements as well and last but not least, some rewards for doing the unwanted WvW-jobs like dolly escort, siege refresh, scouting aren’t a bad thing as well.

And of course achievements you aren’t interested in are easier to ignore than the massive balance destroying player moves due to seasons.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Spring tournament

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

If you are in a league where the first will always win and the last will always loose (most league seem to be like that, only 2:1 may be a way out) score and matches in every week n will be:

1) winner T1 5*n points
2-3) second T1 3n+2 points
2-3) winner T2 3n+2 points

4-6) looser T1 3n points
4-6) Second T2 3n points
4-6) Winner T3 3n points

7-8) Looser T2 3n-2 points
7-8) Second T3 3n-2 points
9) Looser T3 n points

So 2.) and 8.) are 4 points apart, the 8 can catches up by 2 wins in the last two rounds. As the 2.) will mostly get 3 points per round vs the 1.)
And if you are 2.) and loose the last 2 rounds you end as 8.)

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Mounts [merged]

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

^^ You have mounts

The main-mounts are called glider in GW2.

And there are some other in the gem-shop from time to time:
- broom-stick
- flying carpet
- …

But I must say that I am not a fan of wasting developer resources in riding-animations of different animals.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Only a WvW player...

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Only a WvW player knows why he is red/blue/green this week.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Please merge the servers

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Compress yes.

WvW as it currently is, is 24/7 on 4 maps.

But today 80-90% of the time, capacity of the 4 maps is used to less than 10% on 95% of the servers.

It’s to empty to be fun anymore outside 3-4 hours primetime, which additionally are the least important time for match outcome.

I want that changed to get fights and competition again and not only PvD by a handful map-jumpers all night and day long deciding the matches.

But compression is not the only way out. Drop the availability of 4 maps during all 24 hours and or shorter matches e.g. 4h are other possibilities, e.g. https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/wuv/wuv/Proposal-combine-the-best-of-WvW-and-EotM/4181942

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Tyria mastery-a grinding nightmare

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

You cannot get mastery points by grinding!

All Tyria-mastery points are Achievements and you can get Achievements only once per account, and nothing is rewarded for repetition.

That you miss points means: you did not played some parts of the game so far. So something new to do, not some grind of what you already did.

Should you do not know where you have open mastery points: go to the achievement tab, all achievements with open mastery points have a flag (and the groups with open MP-achievements as well). Another tip: if you do not own LS2, you missed a lot MPs.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Any Lower Rank Servers winning?

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

If you improve your rank in the ranking as the result of a match did you lost that match?

If you fail to keep your rank in the ranking as the result of a match did you won that match?

What is wining a match?

Some intermediate sum needed to compute your new ranking and that will never be looked on again? Or the permanent improvement or reduction of your position in the ranking?

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

World linking and names [Merged]

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Every Server has a (community invented) 2-4 letter Tag, e.g. JQ, BG, SFR, Deso, ER, …

How about showing enemy player-names as follows:

[Color] [Rank Title] [Server – Guild Tag]

For example:

Blue Gold-Invador [ER – iN]

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

No more 24/7 WvW

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

You may remember Devon Carver blog at june 5, on the Future of WvW:

“Right now our game rewards you for holding an objective, not necessarily for taking it, and overwhelmingly favors the last server to log out for the day. We have some ideas in the pipeline to try to increase scoring when people are playing the game and to make it much more difficult to keep your territory without actively guarding it.”
https://www.guildwars2.com/en/news/devon-carver-on-the-future-of-world-vs-world/

A pity that it was just another unaccomplished promisse.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Please remove JP from WvW

in Suggestions

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Leave the EB-JP as it is, but put it on a separate map with separate player-limit and queue from EB.

Edit: Separate Maps have separate chat channels as well

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

PPT scoring: Weight by no. of people in wvw

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Yeah, it’s a problem recognized by the players since the 1 week matches were started and not accepted as a problem by ANet since them.
See the thread in my signature for a discussion of it from last winter.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

New WXP booster is a(nother) slap in the face

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Soulbound. Ok. But what’s really annoying me, is that this was a mail exclusive for the first char that logged in and not to the account. That this was my PvE-only-chars (wvw rank 0) means this is just an item for the trash.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

This weeks match ups are a joke...

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Never seeing an enemy can be quite boring.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Latest Balance Patch Killed WvW

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Did not read anything beside the title, but if you would scan the forum for all threads with titles of XZY killed WvW, you probably noticed that it already got killed several hundred times

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Solution to fix the population imbalance

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Yes, zerg gets bigger but main problem is hard-resing during fight.

No the problem is resing of the winner after the fight. That way the zerg keeps size and never has looses due to several small group that are only able to produce causalities, but aren’t able to win.

If instead every complete dead would be send to spawn, the zerg shrinks as a result of every fight. A group of 10 (with a short way) that can force a 40 zerg (with a long way) to fail by repeated attacks: 5 kills on 1st try leaving 35 left, on 2nd attack they have better odds 35:10 and they are able to kill 8, leaving 27, 3rd attack odds are 27:10 they kill 12, leaving 15, …

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

No WEXP from Daily Chests?

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

I remember that I read that the bottles are replaced by immediate WEXP, but today I watched my WEXP while opening the chest, and I did not got anything, neither a bottle nor immediate WEXP.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Killing WVW For low Pop Servers

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Let’s face it: WvWler cry loud but they are a totaly unimportant minority for ANet.
4mio sold GW2 on 51 worlds means an average population of over 70’000 people per world. How many go to WvW? 5000 on a top ranked world 500 on a low ranked world?

We aren’t the business for ANet we are the hobby. As hobby we still get something from time to time, but business has priority. It even has to be that way, without business, there is no money for the hobby.

The main priority for transfer costs is and will be always: Get enough people to the worlds to keep the PvE events working. Do you really think if there are 500 WvWler more or less on a world will affect how PvE will work?

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Reduce the impact of night capping?

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

How off and antisocial does that idea of “prime time” sound?

Hm Jade Quary, you have coverage, and you want to keep your advantage based on this coverage, how antisocial is this?

Concerning shut-down of maps: I think play would be more fun, if people that fit one map are forced to play on one map and aren’t allowed to spread out on 4 or even worser jump around on 4 to play hide-and-seek. They have to fight people instead of fighting doors and playing hide-and-seek.

And if you would read proposals carefully and not only would make propaganda to defend your advantage, you would notice, that most people do not propose to shutdown all maps in off-time, but to scale map-capacity/objective-amounts to the number of players that do play at that time.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

World Linking Beta

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Haha no I wasn’t the one who diggred it out just the post I cited doesn’t exist anymore

And no, it wasn’t meant as lame joke, people are gone now, it would need a mayor release to get more than a handful back.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Shall I use the lvl 80 boost now?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Rather sooner than later you swim in Tome’s of Knowledge (and Birthday lvlup 20-40 lvl so far), allowing you to be 80 with as many chars you are willing to buy slots for. So use your lvl-80-boost now, before you don’t need it anymore.

PS: And nothing hinders you to explore the world and story with a lvl 80. I even like that more, as I don’t like that during lvling I need new clothes and weapons every half an hour

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

EotM : Green is King

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

In the meantime superiority of green is just an psychological effect.

People already assume green is winning, resulting green people go there more often, than red and blue, that do not want to get farmed.

As all believe it, it happens as believed.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

lfg in wvw

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Mapchat/Teamchat can get the same results, no? Just enter a BL and mention on map “Looking for people to go cap us some towers/camps”. Depending on your server rep you’ll get some people from that map to join up..

If you are alone on an empty borderland or outnumbered defending the WP-keep at EB or …, it would be nice, if the lfg-tool could be used to to grab people from PvE!

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Tequatl the Lootless

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

You should go to Teq to save the world!

How can you expect something valuable in his undead rotten body?

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Only a WvW player...

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Only a WvW Player wonders what a competitive match could be.
Only a WvW player wonders why it needs a league to rofl-stomp his server.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Server Survival Competition

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

We have definitely to many server for the current state of WvW and with the WvW rework to be expected late this year it is likely to late for a restart.

On the otherside no server likes to be resolved or merged, so *Fight for the survival of your Server"

So make a survival competition:
- no transfers
- 4 rounds Swiss-System (as in the seasons), but without Gold/Silver/Bronze Separation
. each week the 3 server with the lowest score will be deleted.
- people of deleted server have to find a new home free of charge.

To make an example, if this week would be part of the competition and the current scores would be the final ones, then in EU Ruins of Surmia, Fissure of Woe and Vizunah Square and in NA Kaineng, Crystal Desert and Eredon Terrace would be deleted.

Afterwards we would have 12 server less in EU as well as in NA and WvW would probably be more populated.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

I can buy more storage expanders?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

No idea when it happend, but

Thanks ANet for the 2 new bank-tabs

Check this: March 22 Release Notes

Uh, how could I have missed noticing the most important update since HoT for so long

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Night protection

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Anyhow, as soon as EOTM comes out the cries for Night protection will be over.

All that currently play WvW for the fights and not for “PvD for the glory of your server” will go directly to EOTM (as they resigned long ago to let their server look good against PvD) and only the PvD-fans will be left alone in WvW.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Proposal: Transfer Costs by Rank

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Problem: The linked worlds have to low transfer costs, such that now a hord of bandwaggoners move around between them based on the rank they are linked to..

Solution: Base Transfer-Costs on the rank a world/set of linked worlds currently have, e.g.

Tier 1 (rank 1-3): 3000gems
Tier 2 (rank 4-6): 2500gems
Tier 3 (rank 7-9): 2000gems
Tier 4 (rank 10-12): 1500gems
Tier 1 (rank 13-15): 1000gems
Tier 1 (rank 16-18): 500gems

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

People logging out mid fight

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

I think you have to be aware that you observe 2 completely different situations in an identifcal way:

fairly sure if someone logs out or alt + f4 while downed then you get the kill and the loot

This should be the case if someone logs out, alt-F4’s or (unfortunately not so rare) crashes/DCs..

No loot dropped when they do this and no kill. Always been like this.

I think this happens, if someone is in queue for another WvW-map and gets and accepts the transfer opportunity while in combat.

And I think this is adequat as the player cannot decide when exactly he gets the offer, and it’s not really nice to fight with such a dialog in the middle of the screen.

Then there is also a third thing. The exit button in the WvW-Dialog. This seems to be a bug to me. While the map-buttons are dimmed and are not usable during combat the exit button remains usable. I think it should be dimmed and unusable during combat like the map-switch buttons.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Remove Lion's Arch from the Megaservers.

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Add a server chat would do even better, unfortunately for spambot a as well

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

I'm Confused

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Isn’t that a skill point challenge?

Are skillpoint challenges now disabled at level 7?

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Remove Waterbreathers

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Problem is you currently do NOT wear your helmet underwater, so you wear only 5 runes and the 6th effect doesn’t work, except if you put the same rune into your waterbreather.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Kills & Deaths by Map

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

are there any of these type of stats available for EU?

The API doesn’t deliver them for EU.
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/community/api/WvWvW-API/first#post5947134

I am in doubt that these numbers are correct for NA.
Deaths can only be larger than Kills, if the system also counts suicides (falling to death, dc while in combat without being hit) as deads without killer (Kills can be larger than Deads as a single kill can be credited to both other server).

Any 0 as kills or deaths is very unlikely to be true, also that T4 has 0 kills/deaths over all maps is very, very unlikely.

So if the API is that buggy, it’s impossible to draw conclusions from the numbers it delivers.

Edge of the Mists numbers?

Unfortunately no API for EotM. You wouldn’t know which map anyway.
EDIT: See http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/API:Main for all available API services.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

(edited by Dayra.7405)

Spawn camping with seige - your opinion?

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Useless tactic.

And that you complain in forum instead of ignoring it by using different exits/maps only shows that you are as unorganized and inexperienced as the people that placed/manned the siege.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Alt Abuse in BL

in WvW

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

Why are they sitting at spawn when they could be depleting supplies by building random trebs, catas, and rams inside the enemy keeps, à la Far Hackerpeaks?

  1. Hard to play two avatars at the same time.
  2. harder to prove grief play
  3. completely sufficient to keep the enemy away from the map
Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!

Please No Profession Loot

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dayra.7405

Dayra.7405

A lot is going to depend on how this is actually implemented. Unless they actually come in here and clarify, I think the best we can do is really just wait and see. I don’t think it’s fair to say its going to be an issue, when we simply don’t know. It does possess the potential to be an issue, that is definitely true.

The best think is what we are doing: Pointing to an issue that may got overlooked. Still 2 weeks for minor repairs, like changing some numbers in some tables.

Ceterum censeo SFR esse delendam!